Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 6

Can sterility of stripped iodophor-impregnated plastic adhesive drape be maintained at the time of incision closure in total hip arthroplasty?

Pages
587–590
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Preventive measures against infection, such as minimizing stripping of the IOD or re-sterilizing bare skin after IOD stripping, should be instituted in consideration of these findings when performing THA using IOD.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the contamination rates of the skin under the iodophor-impregnated plastic adhesive drape (IOD) at the time of incision closure in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 225 patients undergoing primary THA (28 men, 197 women; mean age=65 years; age range=30-85) were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Preventive measures against infection, such as minimizing stripping of the IOD or re-sterilizing bare skin after IOD stripping, should be instituted in consideration of these findings when performing THA using IOD.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the contamination rates of the skin under the iodophor-impregnated plastic adhesive drape (IOD) at the time of incision closure in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A total of 225 patients undergoing primary THA (28 men, 197 women; mean age=65 years; age range=30-85) were included in this study. After asepsis using a solution of 1% chlorhexidine with 83% alcohol by volume, the surgical site was painted with a 10% povidone-iodine solution, and IOD was attached tautly at the start of surgery. Swabs of the surgical site were collected as follows: swab A from the skin before IOD application, swab B from the surface of the IOD at the time of incision closure, and swab C from the skin after peeling back the IOD. The obtainedsamples were promptly sent for microbiological analysis. The contamination rate was determined for swabs A, B, and C, and the contamination rate of swab C was compared with that of swabs A and B, and the bacterial species were identified.Results: Positive cultures were seen in 8 cases (3.6%) for swab A, 10 cases (4.4%) for swab B, and 22 cases (9.8%) for swab C. The contamination rate of swab C was significantly higher than that of swabs A (p=0.008) and B (p=0.028). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n=10) and Cutibacterium acnes (n=7) were the most frequently cultured microorganisms from swab C.Conclusion: In THA, the contamination rate of the skin after peeling off the IOD before incision closure was higher than that of the skin immediately after sterilization with povidone-iodine and higher than that on the IOD at the time of incision closure. The detected bacterial species were considered clinically significant pathogens. Preventive measures against infection, such as minimizing stripping of the IOD or re-sterilizing bare skin after IOD stripping, should be instituted in consideration of these findings when performing THA using IOD.

🔖

Cite This Article

TONOTSUKA, H., SUGİYAMA, H., TANAKA, D., ITO, T., AMAGAMİ, A., YONEMOTO, K., SATO, R., SAİTO, M., MARUMO, K. (2020). Can sterility of stripped iodophor-impregnated plastic adhesive drape be maintained at the time of incision closure in total hip arthroplasty?. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 6, 587–590. https://ajindex.com/articles/353461

References (12)

  1. Klouche S, Sariali E, Mamoudy P. Total hip arthroplasty revision due to infection: a cost analysis approach. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010
  2. [Crossref] 2. Rezapoor M, Tan TL, Maltenfort MG, Parvizi J. Incise draping reduces the rate of contamination of the surgical site during hip surgery: A prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2018
  3. [Crossref] 3. Kramer A, Assadian O, Frank M, Bender C, Hinz P, Working Section for Clinical Antiseptic of the German Society for Hospital Hygiene. Prevention of post-operative infections after surgical treatment of bite wounds. GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip 2010
  4. Doc12. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000155. 4. Eyberg MS, Grove G. Prospective, randomized comparison of two presurgical skin antiseptic preparations and resultant surgical incise drape adhesion to skin. The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas: 2011
  5. http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/795707O/randomized-comparison-of-two-presurgical-skin-antiseptic-prep.pdf. 5. Karapınar K, Kocatürk Cİ. The Effectiveness of sterile wound drapes in the prevention of surgical site infection in thoracic surgery. Biomed Res Int 2019
  6. doi: 10.1155/2019/1438793. eCollection 2019. [Crossref] 6. Grove GL, Eyberg CI. Comparison of two preoperative skin antiseptic preparations and resultant surgical incise drape adhesion to skin in healthy volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012
  7. [Crossref] 7. Wilson SE. Microbial sealing: A new approach to reducing contamination. J Hosp Infect 2008
  8. 70 (Suppl 2): 11-4. [Crossref] 8. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011
  9. [Crossref] 9. Falk-Brynhildsen K, Söderquist B, Friberg O, Nilsson UG. Bacterial recolonization of the skin and wound contamination during cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial of the use of plastic adhesive drape compared with bare skin. J Hosp Infect 2013
  10. [Crossref] 10. Webster J, Alghamdi A. Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013
  11. CD006353. [Crossref] 11. Milandt N, Nymark T, Kolmos HJ, Emmeluth C, Overgaard S. Iodine-impregnated incision drape and bacterial recolonization in simulated total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2016
  12. [Crossref] 12. Selwyn S, Ellis H. Skin bacteria and skin disinfection