Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 1

Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of acral metastases in patients with malignant disease: A retrospective study

Pages
67–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean overall survival of the entire study group was 24.9 (range,3–55) months.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical, pathological, and prognostic characteristics of acral metastases in patients withmalignant disease and to determine the impact of different types of acral metastasis treatment on patient survival.Methods: In this retrospective study, 64 acral metastatic lesions in 46 patients (17 women, 29 men; mean age, 61.5 years; age range, 35-82years) who were evaluated by the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors Council of our institute from 2015 to 2019 were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The diagnosis ofacral metastasis was confirmed by histopathological evaluation in 38 patients and clinical and radiological assessment of the lesions in 8patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean overall survival of the entire study group was 24.9 (range,3–55) months.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical, pathological, and prognostic characteristics of acral metastases in patients withmalignant disease and to determine the impact of different types of acral metastasis treatment on patient survival.Methods: In this retrospective study, 64 acral metastatic lesions in 46 patients (17 women, 29 men; mean age, 61.5 years; age range, 35-82years) who were evaluated by the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors Council of our institute from 2015 to 2019 were included. The patients’primary tumor site, tumor type, localization of acral metastases, main symptom, duration from the diagnosis of the primary tumor to thediagnosis of acral metastasis, duration from the diagnosis of acral metastasis to death, and survival data were analyzed. The diagnosis ofacral metastasis was confirmed by histopathological evaluation in 38 patients and clinical and radiological assessment of the lesions in 8patients. The treatment type for each acral metastasis was individualized by the institutional Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors Council andcategorized into 3 groups: excisional surgery (amputations and resections), palliative surgery (prophylactic fixation, intralesional curettage, and bone cement augmentation), and non-surgical treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy).Results: A total of 16 acral metastases (25%) were identified in the upper extremity and 48 (75%) in the lower extremity. The most commonprimary tumor site was the lungs (32.6%), and the most common tumor type was adenocarcinoma (43.2%). The most frequent symptomand the primary reason for admission was pain (58.7%). The mean duration between the diagnosis of primary tumor and the diagnosis ofacral metastasis was 19.1 (range, 0-124) months. No significant correlation was determined between the primary tumor types and durationfrom the diagnosis of primary tumor to the diagnosis of acral metastasis (p=0.278). Acral metastases were treated by excisional surgeryin 15 (32.6%) patients, palliative surgery combined with non-surgical treatment in 10 (21.7%) patients, and only non-surgical treatmentmodalities in 21 (45.7%) patients. No significant correlation existed between the treatment types and patient survival (p=0.058). At thefinal follow-up, 30 (65.2%) patients were dead owing to the disease. The mean overall survival of the entire study group was 24.9 (range,3–55) months. The mean duration between the diagnosis of acral metastasis and death was 7.6 (range, 3–24) months in patients who weredead owing to the disease (p=0.012).Conclusion: When the diagnosis of acral metastasis is established, it should be borne in mind that the most common primary tumor siteand type are most likely the lungs and adenocarcinoma, respectively. The treatment type for acral metastasis may have no significantimpact on patient survival, but the extensiveness of the disease may be a critical factor for survival.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Prognostic study

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTDEMİR, M., USTABAŞIOĞLU, F. E., ÇÖLBE, S. A., USTUN, F., USTA, U., ÇİÇİN, İ. (2021). Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of acral metastases in patients with malignant disease: A retrospective study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 1, 67–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/353458

References (16)

  1. Campanacci M. Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Padova: Piccin Nuova Libraria and Wien. New York: Springer; 1999
  2. Stomeo D, Tulli A, Ziranu A, Perisano C, De Santis V, Maccauro G. Acrometastasis: A literature review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015; 19: 2906-15
  3. Healey JH, Turnbull A, Miedema B, Lane J. Acrometastases. A study of twenty-nine patients with osseous involvement of the hands and feet. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 743-6
  4. Leeson MC, Makley JT, Carter JR. Metastatic skeletal disease distal to the elbow and knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 206: 94-9
  5. Machado V, San-Julian M. Prognosis and treatment of acrometastases: Observational study of 35 cases treated in a single institution. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2019; 63: 49-55
  6. Mavrogenis AF, Mimidis G, Kokkalis ZT, et al. Acrometastases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24: 279-83
  7. Muñoz-Mahamud E, Combalia A, Carreño A, Arandes JM. Five cases of acrometastasis to the hand from a carcinoma and review of the literature. Hand Surg Rehabil 2017; 36: 12-6
  8. Tani S, Morizaki Y, Uehara K, et al. Bone metastasis of limb segments: Is mesometastasis another poor prognostic factor of cancer patients? Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50: 688-92
  9. Yochum TR, Rowe LJ. Tumors and Tumor-Like Processes. In: Yochum TR, Rowe LJ, editors. Essentials of Skeletal Radiology. Philadelphia, UNITED STATES: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2004. p. 1137-372
  10. Lipton JF, Vigorita VJ. Metastatic Bone Disease. In: Vigorita VJ, editor. Orthopaedic Pathology. Philadelphia, UNITED STATES: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. p. 1033-78
  11. Khokhar N, Lee JD. Phalangeal metastasis: First clinical sign of bronchogenic carcinoma. South Med J 1983; 76: 927
  12. Morris G, Evans S, Stevenson J, et al. Bone metastases of the hand. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2017; 99: 563-7
  13. Spiteri V, Bibra A, Ashwood N, Cobb J. Managing acrometastases treatment strategy with a case illustration. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90: 8-11
  14. Ellington JK, Kneisl JS. Acrometastasis to the foot: Three case reports with primary colon cancer. Foot Ankle Spec 2009; 2: 140-5
  15. Barnes M, Tiwana MS, Kiraly A, Hutchison M, Olson RA. Incidence of distal bone metastases in patients treated for palliative radiotherapy and associations with primary tumour types. J Bone Oncol 2015; 4: 107-9
  16. Ohta M, Tokuda Y, Suzuki Y, et al. Whole body PET for the evaluation of bony metastases in patients with breast cancer: comparison with 99Tcm-MDP bone scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun 2001;