Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of contact surface areas of metatarsal diaphyseal osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus: Experimental study

Pages
430–437
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study reaffirms the considerable potential of this new Baran–Unalmodification to confer outstanding contact surface area values, even with the operative correction of hallux valgus deformity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to determine, pre-correction, the potential change in the osteotomy-site bony contact surface areathat would occur during standard metatarsal diaphyseal procedures with the Baran-Unal modification of Mau osteotomy andthen to compare it, post-correction, with the actual osteotomy-site bony contact surface area changes for a standard degree ofdeformity correction.Methods: A total of 30 standard, same sized, biomechanically equivalent, left first metatarsal sawbones were included in this experimental study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Computerized tomography scans and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction imaging were performed for objective and accurate measurements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study reaffirms the considerable potential of this new Baran–Unalmodification to confer outstanding contact surface area values, even with the operative correction of hallux valgus deformity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to determine, pre-correction, the potential change in the osteotomy-site bony contact surface areathat would occur during standard metatarsal diaphyseal procedures with the Baran-Unal modification of Mau osteotomy andthen to compare it, post-correction, with the actual osteotomy-site bony contact surface area changes for a standard degree ofdeformity correction.Methods: A total of 30 standard, same sized, biomechanically equivalent, left first metatarsal sawbones were included in this experimental study. They were divided equally into five groups for each of the planned osteotomy techniques: Myerson’s modification of Ludloff, Mau, scarf, Offset V, and Baran–Unal modification of Mau osteotomy. The normal osteotomy for each samplewas considered as the control, while the corrective osteotomy was the test. Computerized tomography scans and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction imaging were performed for objective and accurate measurements. The techniques of the osteotomyand post-corrective osteotomy bony contact surface areas were investigated by the two independent research assistants.Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the contact surface area changes of all pre- and post-correctiveosteotomy groups (P<0.05). When the pre- and post-correction contact surface areas of any one group were compared with theother groups, the differences were or were not statistically significant. Mean differences between pre-correction and post-correction areas for Ludloff, Mau, scarf, Offset V, and Baran-Unal osteotomies were 180.7, 122.3, 226.2, 191.9, and 68.9 mm2, andthe percentages of area loss were 22.9%, 15.5%, 28.6%, 24.3%, and 8.7%, respectively. The most bony contact area was foundin the scarf osteotomy group (mean pre-correction area: 490.5 mm2 and mean post-correction area: 264.3 mm2), but the Baran–Unal modification group has significantly the highest post-correction bony contact area among the all other groups (meanpre-correction area: 413.3 mm2 and mean post-correction area: 344.4 mm2).Conclusion: Metatarsal diaphyseal osteotomies for hallux valgus deformity have the potential not only for deformity correction, but also for contact surface area preservation. This study reaffirms the considerable potential of this new Baran–Unalmodification to confer outstanding contact surface area values, even with the operative correction of hallux valgus deformity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, A. M., BUDEYRİ, A., BAYKAL, B. (2020). Comparison of contact surface areas of metatarsal diaphyseal osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus: Experimental study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 430–437. https://ajindex.com/articles/353447

References (16)

  1. Johnson AE, Georgopoulos G, Erickson MA, Eilert R. Treatment of adolescent hallux valgus with the first metatarsal double osteotomy: The Denver experience. J Pediatr Orthop 2004
  2. [Crossref] 2. Peterson HA, Newman SR. Adolescent bunion deformity treated with double osteotomy and longitudinal pin fixation of the first ray. J Pediatr Orthop 1993
  3. [Crossref] 3. Robinson AH, Limbers JP. Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005
  4. [Crossref] 4. Rockett MS, Goss LR. Midshaft first-ray osteotomies for hallux valgus. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2005
  5. [Crossref] 5. Ludloff K. Die beseitigung des hallux valgus durch die schrage planta-dorsale osteotomie des metatarsus. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir 1918
  6. Mau C, Lauber H. Die operative Behandlung des hallux Valgus. Deutsche Zeit Orthop 1926
  7. [Crossref] 7. Coetzee JC, Rippstein P. Surgical strategies: scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 2007
  8. [Crossref] 8. Vogler HW. The “off-set V” osteotomy in hallux valgus reduction. In: Six schools of surgical thought (syllabus). Cleveland: Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine, 1985. 9. Bae SY, Schon LC. Surgical strategies: Ludloff first metatarsal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 2007
  9. [Crossref] 10. Coetzee JC. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus repair: the dark side. Foot Ankle Int 2003
  10. [Crossref] 11. Sammarco VJ. Surgical strategies: Mau osteotomy for correction of moderate and severe hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int 2007
  11. [Crossref] 12. Sanhudo JA. Correction of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity by a modified chevron shaft osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 2006
  12. [Crossref] 13. Sanhudo JA. Extending the indications for distal chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 2000
  13. [Crossref] 14. Unal AM, Baran O, Uzun B, Turan AC. Comparison of screw-fixation stabilities of first metatarsal shaft osteotomies: A biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010
  14. [Crossref] 15. Easley ME, Trnka HJ. Current concepts review: hallux valgus part 1: Pathomechanics, clinical assessment, and nonoperative management. Foot Ankle Int 2007
  15. [Crossref] 16. Favre P, Farine M, Snedeker JG, Maquieira GJ, Espinosa N. Biomechanical consequences of first metatarsal osteotomy in treating hallux valgus. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010
  16. [Crossref] 17. Vienne P, Favre P, Meyer D,