Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 1

Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of perilunate injuries treated with open reduction and internal fixation

Pages
57–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean carpal height was within the normal range.Conclusion: In the treatment of perilunate injuries, satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes can be expected from ORIF at mid-termfollow-up.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to present the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with perilunate injuries treated with openreduction and internal fixation (ORIF).Methods: Patients who underwent ORIF due to perilunate injuries from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the final follow-up, pain intensity was evaluated using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean carpal height was within the normal range.Conclusion: In the treatment of perilunate injuries, satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes can be expected from ORIF at mid-termfollow-up.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to present the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with perilunate injuries treated with openreduction and internal fixation (ORIF).Methods: Patients who underwent ORIF due to perilunate injuries from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgery was mostlyperformed using a standard dorsal approach. Each injury was graded as per Mayfield staging. At the final follow-up, pain intensity was evaluated using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Wrist and elbow range of motion, handgrip and pinch strength, Modified Mayo Wrist Scores,and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores were measured. On plain radiographic examination, the scapholunate (SL)angle, SL interval, carpal height, and continuity of Gilula arcs were evaluated. The presence of arthritis was also assessed using the Herzbergclassification.Results: In total, 26 male patients (27 wrists) who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The mean age was 40 years (range:20-58); the mean follow-up was 45 months (range: 16-96).Most of the injuries were fracture-dislocations (n=20; 71.4%). According to Mayfield staging, 7 wrists were grade 3, and 20 wrists were grade4. According to Herzberg staging, 11 (40.7%) patients were stage 2a. The mean VAS was 2.3 (range: 0-5) at rest and 3.3 (range: 0-7) duringactivity. The mean wrist flexion and extension were 50° (range: 21-80°; 73.5% of the unaffected side) and 45.1° (range: 20-74°; 70.9% of theunaffected side), respectively. The mean radial and ulnar deviation were 14.6° (range: 6-25°; 63.6% of the unaffected side) and 22.3° (range:5-40°; 64.7% of the unaffected side), respectively. Grip and pinch strength were 57.6 kg (range: 15-106; 65.5% of the unaffected side) and 18.6kg (range: 8-28; 78.2% of the unaffected side), respectively. The mean Mayo score was 63.3 (range: 20-90), and the DASH score was 24.1±25.2.The mean SL angle was 61.6° (range: 40-83). There was 1 wrist with a pathological SL interval, 11 wrists with dorsal intercalated segmentalinstability, and 3 wrists with fractures of the Gilula arcs. The mean carpal height was within the normal range.Conclusion: In the treatment of perilunate injuries, satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes can be expected from ORIF at mid-termfollow-up.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOLAK, İ., BULUT, G., BEKLER, H. İ., ÇEÇEN, G. S., GÜLABİ, D. (2021). Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of perilunate injuries treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 1, 57–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/353422

References (16)

  1. Herzberg G, Comtet JJ, Linscheid RL, Amadio PC, Cooney WP, Stalder J. Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations: A multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18: 768-79
  2. Gilula LA. Carpal injuries: Analytic approach and case exercises. Am J Roentgenol 1979; 133: 503-17
  3. Herzberg G, Forissier D. Acute dorsal trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations: medium-term results. J Hand Surg Br 2002; 27: 498-502
  4. Mayfield JK, Johnson RP, Kilcoyne RK. Carpal dislocations: Pathomechanics and progressive perilunar instability. J Hand Surg Am 1980;5: 226-41
  5. Mayfield JK. Mechanism of carpal injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; (149): 45-54
  6. Forli A, Courvoisier A, Wimsey S, Corcella D, Moutet F. Perilunate dislocations and transscaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations: a retrospective study with minimum ten-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 62-8
  7. Kremer T, Wendt M, Riedel K, Sauerbier M, Germann G, Bickert B. Open reduction for perilunate injuries clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 1599-1606
  8. Stanbury SJ, Elfar JC. Perilunate dislocation and perilunate-fracture dislocations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19: 554-62
  9. Herzberg G, Burnier M, Marc A, Merlini L, Izem Y. The role of arthroscopy for treatment of perilunate injuries. J Wrist Surg 2015; 4:101-9
  10. Lee SK. Fractures of the carpal bones. In: Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Hotchkiss RN, Kozin SH, Cohen MS (Eds): Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 7th ed. PA: Elsevier, 2017, pp. 588-653
  11. Apergis E. Fracture-Dislocations of the wrist. Springer, Italy, 2013
  12. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 1153-7
  13. Otman S, Demiral H, Sade A. Basic Assessment Principles in Treatment Movements (Tedavi Hareketleretlerinde Temel Değerlendirme Prensipleri). 3rd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Prizma Ofset 2003; 62-87
  14. McGrory B, Amadio P. Malunion of the distal radius. In: Cooney W, Linscheid R, Dobyns J (eds): The wrist: diagnosis and operative treatment. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998, pp. 365-384
  15. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29:602- 8
  16. Muller T, Hidalgo Diaz JJ, Pire E, Prunières G, Facca S, Liverneaux P. Treatment of acute perilunate dislocations: ORIF versus proximal row carpectom