Journals / Acta Veterinaria Eurasia / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Acute Phase Response in Viral Interference between Live Vaccine Virus and a Virulent Newcastle Disease Virus

Pages
64–75
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showedthat the challenge with NDV led to a significant increase in inflammatoryfactors and acute phase response, whereas vaccinationcaused a mild increase in these parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Newcastle disease (ND) is one of the most important viral diseasesin the world that causes considerable damages to thepoultry industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 250 day-old Cobb-500 commercialbroiler chickens were divided randomly into 5 equalgroups (n = 50), and the chicks in each group were treated asfollows: Group 1 received live vaccine at 22 days of age.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showedthat the challenge with NDV led to a significant increase in inflammatoryfactors and acute phase response, whereas vaccinationcaused a mild increase in these parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Newcastle disease (ND) is one of the most important viral diseasesin the world that causes considerable damages to thepoultry industry. This study aimed to investigate the acute phaseresponse in homologous interference between Newcastledisease vaccine virus and a virulent Newcastle disease virus(NDV) in chickens. The experimental chicks received live vaccinevirus either before or after challenge with virulent NDV todetermine the stronger immune system stimulation and higheracute phase response. A total of 250 day-old Cobb-500 commercialbroiler chickens were divided randomly into 5 equalgroups (n = 50), and the chicks in each group were treated asfollows: Group 1 received live vaccine at 22 days of age. Group2 was vaccinated 24 hours prior to the challenge with NDV at23 days of age. Group 3 was challenged with NDV at 23 days ofage and received live vaccine 24 hours later. Group 4 was thenegative control. Group 5 was challenged with NDV at 23 daysof age. Blood samples were collected at intervals of 3, 6, 12, 18,24, 48, 72 hours, and on days 6 and 9 after first inoculation in allthe groups; and measurements of haptoglobin, serum amyloidA, ovotransferrin, adenosine deaminase, serum proteins (totalprotein, albumin, globulins), and gangliosides (total sialic acid,lipid-bound sialic acid, and protein-bound sialic acid) were carriedout according to standard procedures. The results showedthat the challenge with NDV led to a significant increase in inflammatoryfactors and acute phase response, whereas vaccinationcaused a mild increase in these parameters. At 24 hours,group 3 (post-challenge vaccinated chicks) showed a strongerimmune system stimulation and higher acute phase responsethan group 2 (pre-challenge vaccinated chicks). To summarize,the results of this study indicated that challenge with NDVcould lead to a significant increase in the inflammatory factorsand acute phase response, whereas vaccination alone couldcause a mild increase in these parameters. The challenge withNDV followed by vaccination resulted in a stronger immunesystem stimulation and higher acute phase response than vaccinationfollowed by the challenge with NDV. According to thesefindings, vaccination of the chicks with a live vaccine soonafter natural infection with virulent NDV may help the chicks toovercome the sequelae of the disease.

🔖

Cite This Article

GHAEMMAGHAM, M., DADRAS, H., NAZIFI, S. (2021). Evaluation of Acute Phase Response in Viral Interference between Live Vaccine Virus and a Virulent Newcastle Disease Virus. Acta Veterinaria Eurasia, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 64–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/353188

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adler, K. L., Peng, P. H., Peng, R. K., & Klasing, K. C. (2001). The kinetics of hemopexin and α1-acid glycoprotein levels induced by injection of inflammatory agents in chicken’s inflammatory agents in chickens. Avian Diseases, 45(2), 289-296. [Crossref] Afsar, M., Nazifi, S., Dadras, H., Taebipour, M. J., & Ansari-Lari, M. (2018). Evaluation of antioxidant parameters in broiler chicken after vaccination and experimental challenge with Newcastle disease virus. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 38(1), 19-24. [Crossref] Alexander, D. J. (2001). Newcastle disease, the Gordon Memorial Lecture. British Poultry Science, 42(1), 5-22. [Crossref] Alexander, D. J. (2003). Newcastle disease, other avian paramyxoviruses, and pneumovirus infections. In Y.M. Saif, (Ed.), Diseases of Poultry, (11th Ed., pp. 63-100).
  2. Iowa State Press, Ames, 10, Alexander, D. J., & Senne, D. A. (2008). Newcastle disease, other avian paramyxoviruses, and pneumovirus infections. In Y.M. Saif, A. M. Fadly, J. R. Glisson, L. R. McDougald, L. K. Nolan, & D. E. Swayne, (Eds.), Diseases of Poultry, (12th Ed., pp. 75-116).
  3. Iowa State University Press,
  4. Ames, Iowa. Al-Garib, S. O., Gielkens, A. L. J., Gruys, E., Hartog, L., & Koch, G. (2003). Immunoglobulin class distribution of systemic and mucosal antibody responses to Newcastle disease in chickens. Avian Diseases, 47(1), 32-40. [Crossref] Asasi, K., Mohammadi, A., Boroomand, Z., Hosseinian, S. A., & Nazifi, S. (2013). Changes of several acute phase factors in broiler chickens in response to infectious bronchitis virus infection. Poultry Science, 92(8), 1989-1996. [Crossref] Barbe, F., Atanasova, K., & Van Reeth, K. (2011). Cytokines and acute phase proteins associated with acute swine influenza infection in pigs. The Veterinary Journal, 187(1), 48-53. [Crossref] Boiago, M. M., Baldissera, M. D., Doleski, P. H., Bottari, N. B., do Carmo, G. M., Araujo, D. N., Giuriatti, J., Baggio, V., Leal, D. B. R., Casagrande, R. A., Wisser, C. S., Stefani, L. M., & da Silva, A.S. (2016). Ectonucleotidases and adenosine deaminase activity in laying hens naturally infected by Salmonella gallinarum and their effects on the pathogenesis of the disease. Microbial Pathogenesis, 93, 180-184. [Crossref] Capua, I., Cattoli, G., & Marangon, S. (2005). DIVA-a vaccination strategy enabling the detection of field exposure to avian influenza. Developments in Biologicals, 119, 229-233.
  5. Cardoso, W. M., Aguiar Filho, J. L. C., Romão, J. M., Oliveira, W. F., Salles, R. P. R., Teixe