SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy / 2012 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Miracle and causality in David Hume

David Hume'da mucize ve nedensellik

MUSTAFA ÇEVİK
Pages
1–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Here we discussed particularly the “law” and the “violation of law”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper it has been discussed the problems arise from the definition of miracle which take place in some religious and philosophical texts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The definitions particularly quoted from David Hume’s texts and Islamic resources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Here we discussed particularly the “law” and the “violation of law”.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper it has been discussed the problems arise from the definition of miracle which take place in some religious and philosophical texts. The definitions particularly quoted from David Hume’s texts and Islamic resources. The problems discussed in two titles. First problem is the possibility of miracle as a historical event. The other is the possibility of miracle as “the law of nature”. Here we discussed particularly the “law” and the “violation of law”.

Özet

Bu yazıda kimi felsefi ve dini metinlerde yer alan mucize tanımının içerdiği sorunlar tartışılmaktadır. Tanımlamalar konusunda daha çok David Hume ve İslami kaynaklardan yararlanılmıştır. Mucizenin doğurduğu felsefi problemler iki başlık altında ele alınmıştır. Bunlardan birincisi tarihsel bir olay olarak mucizenin imkânı, diğeri ise “doğa yasası” olarak mucizenin imkânıdır. Burada özellikle “yasa” ve “yasanın ihlali” terimleri üzerinde durulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEVİK, M. (2012). Miracle and causality in David Hume. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/353117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbulut, A. (1992). Nübüvvet Meselesi Üzerine. Ankara:
  2. Birleşik Dağıtım. Çevik, M. (2005). David Hume’un Bilgi Kuramı. Ankara:
  3. İlahiyat Yayınları.
  4. Earman, J. (2000). Hume’s Object Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. Oxford: Oxford University. Ebu Hanife (1984). Fıkh-ı Ekber. İstanbul: Kültür Basın Yayın Birliği. Ebu’l-İzz (1988). Şerhu’t-Tahâviyye fi’l-Akîdeti’s-Selefiyye. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikri’l-Lubnânî. Gaskin, J.C.A. (1988). Hume’s Philosphy of Religion. New Jersey: Humanities Press Int. Hick, J. (1963). Philosophy of Religion. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. Hume, D. (1947). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (ed. N.K. Smith). Lon- don: Thomas Nelson & Sons. Hume, D. (1975). Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  5. Hume, D. (1964).
  6. Essays Moral, Political and Literary (eds. T.H. Green & T.H. Grose). London. Hume, D. (1978). Treatise of Human Nature (ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge). Oxford: Clar- endon Press.
  7. Hunt, J. (1996). David Hume. Hume on Natural Religion. (ed. S. Tweyman). Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
  8. Huxley, T. (1879). Hume. New York: Harper & Brothers. Îcî, A. (1989). El-Mevâkıf fî İlmi’l-Kelâm. Beyrut: Âlemu’l-Kutub. Kılıç, R. (2000). Modern Batı Düşüncesinde Vahiy. Ankara:
  9. A.Ü.İ.F. Yayınları.
  10. Mavrodes, G.I. (1985). Miracles and the Laws of Nature. Faith and Philosophy, 2(4). Orr, J. (1990). David Hume and His Influence on Philosophy and Theology. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
  11. Pailin, D. (1989). Groundwork of Philosophy of Religion. London: Epworth Press.
  12. Voltaire (1972). Philosophical Dictionary (ed. T. Besterman). London: Penguin Books.