SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bilig / Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Sayı: 49

Öğrencilerin Kopya Faktörlerine Bakış Açıları ile Akademik Başarıları Arasında Bir İlişki Var mı?

Is There a Relationship between Grade Average Point and Students' Perceptions with Regard to Cheating Factors?

AHMET TAYFUN
Pages
191–204
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A significant relation was found between being a cheater or non cheater and certain factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined the relations between the grade point average, being a cheater or non cheater and the determined cheating factor scores.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total, 493 students participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A significant relation was found between being a cheater or non cheater and certain factors.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examined the relations between the grade point average, being a cheater or non cheater and the determined cheating factor scores. In total, 493 students participated in the study. The data were collected by using questionnaires. The factor analysis, Pearson correlation test and "t" test were used to analyze student-opinion data. First, the nine factors were determined to represent 34 variables, and then nine factors were rotated to factors scores. Later the relations were examined. The significant relation couldn't be found between grade point averages and factor scores. A significant relation was found between being a cheater or non cheater and certain factors.

Özet

Bu çalışma, akademik başarı ortalaması, kopya davranışında bulunmuş olma veya olmama ile belirlenen kopya davranış faktörleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışmaya toplam 493 öğrenci katıl-mıştır. Veriler anket yardımı ile toplanmıştır. Öğrencilerin görüşlerine ilişkin veriler "t" testi, Pearson korelâsyonu ve faktör analizleri kullanı-larak analiz edilmiştir. Öncelikle 34 değişkeni temsil eden 9 faktör tespit edilmiştir. Daha sonra bu 9 faktör faktör skoruna dönüştürülmüştür. En son olarak ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Başarı ortalaması ile faktörler arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmaz iken kopya davranışı göstermiş olma ile bazıfaktörler arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAYFUN, A. (2009). Öğrencilerin Kopya Faktörlerine Bakış Açıları ile Akademik Başarıları Arasında Bir İlişki Var mı?. Bilig / Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 49, 191–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/352939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ames, Carole and Jennifer Archer (1988). "Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes". Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 260-267.
  2. Baird, John S. (1980). "Current trends in college cheating". Psychology in the Schools 17: 515-522.
  3. Calabrese, Raymond L. and John T. Cochran (1990). "The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents". Journal of Research and Development in Education 23(2): 65-72.
  4. Cochran, John K. et al. (1998). "Academic dishonesty and low self-control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime". Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal 19: 227-255.
  5. Davis, Stephen F. et al. (1992). "Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments". Teaching of Psychology 19: 16-20.
  6. Goodenow, Carol (1993). "Classroom belonging among early adolescents: Relationships to motivation and achievement". Journal of Early Adolescence 13: 21-43.
  7. Graham, Mari Ann et al. (1994). "Cheating at small colleges: An examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviours". Journal of College Student Development 35: 255-260.
  8. Haines, Valerie J. et al. (1986). "College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude". Research in Higher Education 25: 342-354.
  9. Houston, John P. (1977). "Four Components of Rotter's internal - external scale and cheating". Contemporary Educational Psychology 2: 275-283.
  10. Jensen, Lene Arnett et al. (2002). "It's wrong but everybody does it: academic dishonesty among high school and college students", Contemporary Educational Psychology 27: 209-228.
  11. Johnson, Charles D. and John Gromly (1972). "Academic Cheating: The contribution of sex, personality and situational variables". Developmental Psychology 6: 320-324.
  12. Juvonen, Jaana and Kathryn R. Wentzel (1996). Social motivation: Understanding children's school adjustment. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  13. Kelly, Jeffrey A. and Leonard Worell (1978). "Personality Characteristics, parents behaviors, and sex of subject in relation to cheating". Journal of Research in Personality 12: 179-188.
  14. Karabenick, Stuart. A. and K. Srull Tomas (1978). "Effects of Personality and Situational Variation in Locus of Control on Academic Cheating: Determinants of the 'Congruence Effect' ". Journal of Personality 46: 72-95.
  15. McCabe, Donald M., Linda Kelebe Trevino and Kenneth. D. Butterfield (2001). "Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research". Ethics & Behavior 11: 219-