SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bezmiâlem Science / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Fiziksel Engelli ve Sağlıklı Çocuklarda Solunum Parametrelerinin Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Respiratory Parameters of Physically Disabled and Healthy Children

RASMİ MUAMMER
ZAHİDE SEDA BAKTIR
Kıymet MUAMMER
Pages
8–11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In addition to the rehabilitation program for physically disabled children, a pulmonary rehabilitation program aiming to conduct respiratory training and increase the respiratory capacity would be useful.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the respiratory parameters of physically disabled and healthy children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 25 children.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In addition to the rehabilitation program for physically disabled children, a pulmonary rehabilitation program aiming to conduct respiratory training and increase the respiratory capacity would be useful.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the respiratory parameters of physically disabled and healthy children. Methods: The study included 25 children. Of these children, 13 were physically disabled and 12 were healthy children. The BTL-08 spirometry device was used for measuring the respiratory values of the children. The gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) and manual ability classification system (MACS) levels were determined. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the respiratory parameters of physically disabled and healthy children in relation to the restrictive patterns (p<0.001). The values of forced vital capacity (%FVC) were found to be better in children with GMFCS level 2 and lower than children with level 3 and above (p<0.05). Conclusion: In addition to the rehabilitation program for physically disabled children, a pulmonary rehabilitation program aiming to conduct respiratory training and increase the respiratory capacity would be useful.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı fiziksel engelli ile sağlıklı çocukların solunum parametrelerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 13 fiziksel engelli ve 12 sağlıklı olmak üzere toplam 25 çocuk dahil edildi. Çocukların solunum değerlerini ölçmede BTL-08 spirometre kullanıldı. Kaba Motor Fonksiyon Sınıflama Sistemi (GMFCS) ve El Becerileri Sınıflandırma Sistemi (MACS) seviyeleri belirlendi. Bulgular: Fiziksel engelli ile sağlıklı çocukların solunum parametreleri karşılaştırıldığında restriktif paternler açısından aralarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0,001). GMFCSe göre seviye 2 ve altı çocukların seviye 3 ve üstü çocuklara göre zorlu vital kapasite (%FVC) değerlerinin daha iyi olduğu bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Sonuç: Fiziksel engelli çocukların rehabilitasyon programına respiratuar eğitim ve solunum kapasitelerini arttırmaya yönelik pulmoner rehabilitasyon programlarının da dahil edilmesinin yararlı olacağını düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUAMMER, R., BAKTIR, Z. S., MUAMMER, K. (2015). Fiziksel Engelli ve Sağlıklı Çocuklarda Solunum Parametrelerinin Karşılaştırılması. Bezmiâlem Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 8–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/352581

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. T.C. Sosyal hizmetler ve çocuk esirgeme kurumu genel müdürlüğü. Özürlülerin bakımı, rehabilitasyonu ve aile danışmanlığı. Yönetmelik 2010
  2. Barclay L, Lie D. Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation may be helpful in adolescents with neuromuscular disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159: 526-31. [CrossRef] 3. Braverman JM. Airway clearance dysfunction associated with cerebral palsy: an overview. Advanced Respiratory 2001
  3. Doull I. Respiratory disorders in down’s syndrome: overview with diagnostic and treatment options. Respiratory Disorders (General). Royal Society of Medicine Conference 2001
  4. Evans PM, Evans SJ, Alberman E. Cerebral palsies: why we must plan for survival. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 1329-33. [CrossRef] 6. Dempsey JA, Romer L, Rodman J, Miller J, Smith C. Consequences of exercise-induced respiratory muscle work. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2006; 151: 242-50. [CrossRef] 7. Garrod R. The Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation: evidence and implications for physiotherapists. London: Kingston University Press 2003
  5. Massery M. Chest development as a component of normal motor development: implications for pediatric physical therapists. Chest Development 1991; 3-8
  6. Rochester D. Respiratory effects of respiratory muscle weakness and atrophy. Am Rew Respir Dis 1986; 134: 1083-6
  7. Park ES, Park JH, Rha DW, Park C, Park CW. Comparison of the ratio of upper to lower chest wall in children with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and normally developed children. Yonsei Med J 2006; 47: 237-42. [CrossRef] 11. Seddon PC, Khan Y. Respiratory problems in children with neurological impairment. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88: 75-8. [CrossRef] 12. Strauss D, Cable W, Shavelle R. Causes of excess mortality in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 580-5. [CrossRef] 13. Muammer K, Muammer R. Pulmonary rehabilitation and encountered difficulties in disabled children. Yeditepe Medical J 2009; 11: 220-6
  8. Kwon YH, Lee HY. Differences of respiratory function according to level of the gross motor function classification system in children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci 2014; 26: 389-91. [CrossRef] 15. Kwon YH, Lee HY. Differences of the truncal expansion and respiratory function between children with spastic diplegic and hemiplegic cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci 2013; 25: 1633-5. [CrossRef] 16. Alexander R, Boehme R, Cupps B. Normal development of functional motor skills: the first year of life. Tucson, Ariz: Therapy Skill Builders 1993.