Journals / Central Bank Review / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Market-based monetary policy expectations for Turkey

Pages
9–19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We also note that CBRT’smonetary policy predictability also changes with CBRT’s choice of monetary policy implementation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study discusses various types of market-based instruments and tries to find which financial instrumentis the best in predicting monetary policy expectations for different time horizons in Turkey.Consistent with the existing literature on this subject, we adopt an approach that comes from expectationstheory of term structure of interest rates, which implies that short term forward interest ratesreflect market expectations of short term rates in the future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By using this methodology, we treat upcomingmonthly, 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months, and 24-months average of daily CBRTeffective policy rates as alternative dependent variables; and market rates with corresponding maturitiesas independent variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We also note that CBRT’smonetary policy predictability also changes with CBRT’s choice of monetary policy implementation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study discusses various types of market-based instruments and tries to find which financial instrumentis the best in predicting monetary policy expectations for different time horizons in Turkey.Consistent with the existing literature on this subject, we adopt an approach that comes from expectationstheory of term structure of interest rates, which implies that short term forward interest ratesreflect market expectations of short term rates in the future. By using this methodology, we treat upcomingmonthly, 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, 12-months, and 24-months average of daily CBRTeffective policy rates as alternative dependent variables; and market rates with corresponding maturitiesas independent variables. We aim to assess which market rate has the best predictive power for CBRTeffective policy rates. We find that FX forward implied rates dominate all other instruments for 3, 6, 9, 12and 24 months horizons while Borsa Istanbul overnight repo rate expectation from CBRT’s Survey ofExpectations is the best for 1-month horizon in forecasting future policy rates. We also note that CBRT’smonetary policy predictability also changes with CBRT’s choice of monetary policy implementation.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇELİK, F., TALASLI, A. (2020). Market-based monetary policy expectations for Turkey. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 9–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/351805

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Alp, H., Kara, H., Keles, G., Gurkaynak, R., Orak, M., 2010. Measuring Market Based Monetary Policy Expectations in Turkey, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Working Paper No. 10/11. Binici, M., Kara, H., Ozlü, P., 2019. Monetary transmission with multiple policy rates: € evidence from Turkey. Appl. Econ. 51e17, 1869e1893. Bomfim, A., 2003. Pre-announcement effects, news effects, and volatility: monetary policy and the Stock market. J. Bank. Financ. 27, 133e151. Brunner, A.D., 2000. On the derivation of monetary policy shocks: should we throw the VAR out with the bath water? J. Money Credit Bank. 32, 254e279. Christoffersen, P.F., Diebold, F.X., 1998. Cointegration and long-horizon forecasting. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 16, 450e458. Diebold, F.X., Mariano, R.S., 1995. Comparing predictive accuracy. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 13, 253e263. Duy, T.A., Thoma, M.A., 1998. Modelling and forecasting cointegrated variables: some practical experience. J. Econ. Bus. 50, 291e307. Faust, J., Swanson, E., Wright, J.H., 2004. Identifying VARs based on high frequency futures data. J. Monet. Econ. 51, 1107e1131. Gertler, Mark, Peter, Karadi, 2015. Monetary policy surprises, credit costs, and economic activity. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 7 (1), 44e76. Gurkaynak, R.S., Sack, B., Swanson, E., 2007. Market-based measures of monetary policy expectations. April J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 25 (No. 2), 201e12. Kim, D.H., Orphanides, A., 2007. The bond market term premium: what is it, and how can we measure it? BIS Q. Rev. 27e40. June. Krueger, J.T., Kuttner, K.N., 1996. The fed funds futures rate as a predictor of federal reserve policy. J. Futures Mark. 16, 865e879. Kuttner, K., 2001. Monetary policy surprises and interest rates: evidence from the fed funds futures market. J. Monet. Econ. 47, 523e544. Küçük, H., Ozlü, P., Talasl € ı, A., Ünalmıs, D., Yüksel, C., 2016. Interest rate corridor, liquidity management and the overnight spread. Contemp. Econ. Policy 34 (4). October 2016.
  2. Lloyd, S.P., 2017. Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Interest Rate Channel: Signalling and Portfolio Rebalancing,” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1735. University of Cambridge. Macaulay, F.R., 1938. The Movements of Interest Rates. Bond Yields. Mertens, Karel, Ravn, Morten O., 2013. The dynamic effects of personal and corporate income tax changes in the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 103 (4), 1212e1247. Poole, W., Rasche, R.H., 2000. Perfecting the market’s knowledge of monetary policy. J. Financ. Serv. Res.