Journals / Central Bank Review / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

How do fund rates affect the U.S. firms? A threshold estimation

Pages
75–84
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Second, as far as actual Fund rates are fluctuating around zero percent, theresults show that each one percent increase in the FFR is associated with a decrease in the firm size by 0.5percent.Originality/value: This paper offers three significant contributions to the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The financing of growth of the firm is quite sensitive to fluctuations in Fund rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This requiresa treatment of Fund rates being subject to structural shifts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Second, as far as actual Fund rates are fluctuating around zero percent, theresults show that each one percent increase in the FFR is associated with a decrease in the firm size by 0.5percent.Originality/value: This paper offers three significant contributions to the literature.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: The financing of growth of the firm is quite sensitive to fluctuations in Fund rates. This requiresa treatment of Fund rates being subject to structural shifts. This paper examines the impact of thresholdFederal Fund Rate (FFR), being a proxy for Federal Reserve policy, on different dimensions of growth ofthe US firm. The goal is to examine the extent to which shifts in FFR cause changes in firms’ growth usingthree main proxies: assets, sales revenue and number of employees.Design/methodology/approach: This paper follows “Threshold Fixed Effect” model as a new methodological treatment that offers a structural change in the sources of funds for financing growth of the firms.The authors propose that “Threshold Fixed effect regression” and “Threshold First Difference GeneralizedMethod of Moments” provide robust results of the impact of FFR shifts on growth of the firms.Findings: The main findings are as follows. First, the impact of FFR is substantially significant on growthof the firms listed in S&P500 when FFR declines below the threshold point 1.35 percent. That is, a slightmove in the FFR adversely affects growth of firms four times higher relative to the situation when FFR isgreater than 1.35 percent. Second, as far as actual Fund rates are fluctuating around zero percent, theresults show that each one percent increase in the FFR is associated with a decrease in the firm size by 0.5percent.Originality/value: This paper offers three significant contributions to the literature. First, this paper offersa novel treatment of the effect of Fund rates on the financing of growth of the firm. As far as the authors’knowledge is concerned, this paper might be the first attempt to use “Threshold fixed effect” model toestimate the effects of threshold FFR on growth of the firm. Second, the results of threshold FFR offerrobust evidence that theories of firm capital structure are contingent on structural changes in thresholdinterest rates. Third, this paper provides an empirical guidline to central banks regrading the determination of Fund rates that help firms to grow.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAMİ, M., ELDOMIATY, T. I., KAMAL, M. (2020). How do fund rates affect the U.S. firms? A threshold estimation. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 75–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/351798

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ardishvili, A., Cardozo, S., Harmon, S., Vadakath, S., 1998. Towards a theory of new venture growth. In: Paper Presented at the 1998 Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference (Ghent, Belgium). Arellano, M., Bond, S., 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58, 277-297.
  2. Ayad, M., Abd El-Aziz, A., 2018. The impact of remittances on children’s educational attainment: evidence from Egypt. Socio Econ. Challenges 2, 49-59.
  3. Balkema, A.A., de Haan, L., 1974. Residual lifetime at great age. Ann. Probab. 2, 792-804.
  4. Barnea, A., Haugen, R., Senbet, L., 1981. An equilibrium analysis of debt financing under costly tax arbitrage and agency problems. J. Finance 36 (3), 569-581.
  5. Bosworth, B., 1971. Patterns of corporate external financing. Brookings Pap. Econ. Activ. 2, 253-279.
  6. Borio, C., Gambacorta, L., 2017. Monetary Policy and Bank Lending in a Low Interest Rate Environment: Diminishing Effectiveness?, p. 612. BIS Working Papers No. Bougheas, S., Mizen, P., Yalcin, C., 2006. Access to external finance: theory and evidence on the impact of monetary policy and firm-specific characteristics. J. Baning Fin. 30, 199-227.
  7. Busch, R., Memmel, C., 2016. Quantifying the components of the banks’ net interest margin. Financ. Mark. Portfolio Manag. 30 (4), 371-396.
  8. Cantor, R., 1990. Effects of Leverage on Corporate Investment and Hiring Decisions. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Quarterly Review, pp. 31-41.
  9. Cooley, T.F., Quadrini, V., 2001. Financial markets and firm dynamics. Am. Econ. Rev. 91 (5), 1286e1310. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., Gartner, W.B., 2003. Arriving at the high-growth firm. J. Bus. Ventur. 18 (2), 189-216.
  10. Delmar, F., 1997. Measuring growth: methodological considerations and empirical results. In: Donckels, R., Miettinen, A. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and SME Research: on its Way to the Next Millennium, pp. 199-216. Dell’Ariccia, G., Luc Laeven, L., Marquez, R., 2011. Financial frictions, foreign cur rency borrowing and systemic risk. In: Paper Presented at the 12th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference Hosted by the International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCeNovember, vols 10-11, 2011.
  11. Dobson, J., 2004. Size matters. Bus. Prof. Ethics J. 23 (3), 45-59.
  12. Driscoll, J., Kraay, A., 1998. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80, 549-560.
  13. Eldomiaty, T., 2010. The contribution of sales revenue management to firm growth