Journals / art / 2021 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Validation of the Turkish Form of Short Form-12 health survey version 2 (SF-12v2)

Journal
art
Pages
280–286
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In criterion validity, the psychiatric group had the lowest mean score in mental health, vitality, social functioning and role difficulties due to emotional problems, whereas the surgical group had the lowest mean score in bodily pain, role difficulties due to physical problems, and physical functioning.Conclusion: Our study results show that the Turkish form of SF-12v2 is valid and reliable both in clinical practice and clinical trials.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this present study, we aimed to perform the reliability and validity analyses of the Turkish Form of Short Form-12 version 2 (SF-12v2) in different groups of patients.Patients and methods: After the permission for the validation study of the Turkish Form, Optum provided the authors the validly translated Turkish Form of SF-12v2.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out in rheumatological, psychiatric, and surgical wards of Manisa Celal Bayar University Hafsa Sultan Training and Research Center between September 2019 and June 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In criterion validity, the psychiatric group had the lowest mean score in mental health, vitality, social functioning and role difficulties due to emotional problems, whereas the surgical group had the lowest mean score in bodily pain, role difficulties due to physical problems, and physical functioning.Conclusion: Our study results show that the Turkish form of SF-12v2 is valid and reliable both in clinical practice and clinical trials.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: In this present study, we aimed to perform the reliability and validity analyses of the Turkish Form of Short Form-12 version 2 (SF-12v2) in different groups of patients.Patients and methods: After the permission for the validation study of the Turkish Form, Optum provided the authors the validly translated Turkish Form of SF-12v2. The study was carried out in rheumatological, psychiatric, and surgical wards of Manisa Celal Bayar University Hafsa Sultan Training and Research Center between September 2019 and June 2020. Taking possible dropouts into consideration, a total of 136 patients (67 males, 69 females; mean age: 43.5±14.4 years; range 19 to 82 years) constituted the study group. In addition to SF-12v2, for concurrent validity, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) was used as the comparator instrument.Results: In internal consistency, for the physical component summary score, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.80, and item-total score correlation coefficients were between 0.32 and 0.73. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the mental component summary score was found to be 0.88 where the item-total correlation coefficients varied between 0.60 and 0.78. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution, representing mental and physical components. For criterion validity, convergent and discriminant validity analyses were performed using NHP with SF-12v2, and domains of SF-12v2 correlated well with the domains of NHP accordingly. In criterion validity, the psychiatric group had the lowest mean score in mental health, vitality, social functioning and role difficulties due to emotional problems, whereas the surgical group had the lowest mean score in bodily pain, role difficulties due to physical problems, and physical functioning.Conclusion: Our study results show that the Turkish form of SF-12v2 is valid and reliable both in clinical practice and clinical trials.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDÜZ, Ö. S., MUTLU, S., BASLI, A. A., GÜL, C., AKGÜL, Ö., YILMAZ, E., AYDEMİR, Ö. (2021). Validation of the Turkish Form of Short Form-12 health survey version 2 (SF-12v2). art, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 280–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/351763

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Post MW. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2014;20:167-80
  2. Ware JE Jr, Brook RH, Davies AR, Lohr KN. Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. Am J Public Health 1981;71:620-5
  3. Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach. 1st ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992
  4. Halyard MY, Ferrans CE. Quality-of-Life assessment for routine oncology clinical practice. J Support Oncol 2008;6:221-9, 233
  5. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item shortform health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83
  6. Koçyi¤it H, Aydemir Ö, Fiek G, Ölmez N, Memi AK. Form-36 (KF-36)’nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirli¤i ve geçerlili¤i. Ilaç ve tedavi dergisi 1999;12:102-6
  7. Maruish ME. User’s manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. 3rd ed. Lincoln, RI: Quality-Metric Incorporated; 2011
  8. Maruish ME. User’s manual for the SF-12v2 Health Survey. 3rd ed. Lincoln, RI: Quality-Metric Incorporated; 2012
  9. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B, Sundaram M, Bjorner JB. User’s manual for the SF-12v2 Health Survey. 2nd ed. Lincoln, RI: Quality-Metric Incorporated; 2010
  10. Kücükdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, Gürsel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000;23:31-8
  11. Islam N, Khan IH, Ferdous N, Rasker JJ. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the English “Short form SF 12v2” into Bengali in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017;15:109
  12. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, Asadi-Lari M, Omidvari S, Tavousi M. The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2): a population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:12
  13. Lam ET, Lam CL, Fong DY, Huang WW. Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese? J Eval Clin Pract 2013;19:200-8
  14. Wettstein M, Eich W, Bieber C, Tesarz J. Pain Intensity, Disability, and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Does Age Matter? Pain Med 2019;20:464-75
  15. Tan ML, Wee HL, Salim A, Lee J, Ma S, Heng D, et al. Validity of a Revised Short Form-12 Health Survey Version 2 in Different Ethnic Populations. Ann Acad Med Singap 2016;45:228-36.