Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Sensitivity of online coupled model to extreme pollution event over a mega city Delhi

Pages
25–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The predictability of the model and its limitation to micrometeorological processes arediscussed in detail.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sensitivity of interactive Weather-Chemistry model has been examined to predict the air quality (1 and 3days in advance) of Indian mega city Delhi during two identical extreme events of Diwali in 2012 and2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Analysis is conducted 3 days prior to 3 days later of Diwali day for both events to verify the rapidchanges in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) due to widespread display of Diwali fireworks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The predictability of the model and its limitation to micrometeorological processes arediscussed in detail.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Sensitivity of interactive Weather-Chemistry model has been examined to predict the air quality (1 and 3days in advance) of Indian mega city Delhi during two identical extreme events of Diwali in 2012 and2013. Analysis is conducted 3 days prior to 3 days later of Diwali day for both events to verify the rapidchanges in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) due to widespread display of Diwali fireworks. The modelsuccessfully predicted the variability in PM2.5 during 2012 for the entire period of analysis withreasonable accuracy. Although model performed reasonably well until Diwali day in 2013 but it wasunable to simulate rapid built up of PM2.5 (1500 mg3 hourly average) during post Diwali day as it failedto capture unusual mid-night steep temperature gradient followed by a record lowering of boundarylayer height. The predictability of the model and its limitation to micrometeorological processes arediscussed in detail.

🔖

Cite This Article

SRİNİVAS, R., PANİCKER, A. S., PARKHİ, N. S., PESHİN, S. K., BEİG, G. (2016). Sensitivity of online coupled model to extreme pollution event over a mega city Delhi. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 25–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/351524

References (4)

  1. Barman, S.C., Singh, R., Negi, M.P.S., Bhargava, S.K., 2008. Ambient air quality of Lucknow City (India) during use of fireworks on Diwali Festival. Environ. Monit. Assess. 137, 495e504. Beig, G., Chate, D.M., Ghude, S.D., Ali, K., Satpute, T., Sahu, S.K., Parkhi, N., Trimbake, H.K., 2013a. Evaluating population exposure to environmental pollutants during Deepavali fireworks displays using Air Quality Measurements of the SAFAR network. Chemosphere. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2013.02.043. Beig, G., Chate, D.M., Ghude, S.D., Mahajan, A.S., Srinivas, R., Ali, K., Sahu, S.K., Parkhi, N., Surendran, D., Trimbake, H.R., 2013b. Quantifying the effect of air quality control measures during the 2010
  2. Commonwealth Games at Delhi, India. Atmos. Environ. 80, 455e463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.012.
  3. Devara, P.C.S., Raj, P.E., Pandithurai, G., Naresh, P., 1997. Atmospheric stability effects on aerosols and stratification. J. Meteorol. 22, 176e187. Fast, J.D., Gustafson Jr., W.I., Easter, R.C., Zaveri, R.A., Barnard, J.C., Chapman, E.G., Grell, G.A., Peckham, S.E., 2006. Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology-chemistry-aerosol model. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D21305,. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006721. Grell, G.A., Peckham, S.E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S.,A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W.C., Eder, B., 2005. Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39, 6957e6975. Joly, A., Smargiassi, A., Kosatsky, T., Fournier, M., Dabek Zlotorzynska, E., Celo, V., Mathieu, D., Servranckx, R., D'amours, R., Malo, A., Brook, J., 2010. Characterisation of particulate exposure during firework displays. Atmos. Environ. 44, 4325e4329. Lin, Y.L., Farley, R.D., Orville, H.D., 1983. Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Appl. Meteorol. 22, 1065e1092. MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests), 2009. Notification on National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), Seventh Amendment Rules e 2009.
  4. New Delhi, India. Ravindra, K., Mittal, A.K., Grieken, R.V., 2001. Health risk assessment of urban suspended particulate matter with special reference to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a review. Rev. Environ. Health 16 (3), 169e189. Ravindra, K., Mor, S., Kaushik, C.P., 2003. Short-term variation in air quality associated with firework events: a cases study. J. Environ. Monit. 5, 260e26