Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Air pollutants concentrations forecasting using back propagation neural network based on wavelet decomposition with meteorological conditions

Pages
557–566
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the W-BPNN model has better forecasting performance for thethree air pollutants than mono-BPNN model in terms of the statistics indexes (mean absolute percentageerror, root mean square error and correlation coefficient criteria) and the forecasting accuracy of thenumber of relevant days of individual air quality index.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Air quality forecasting is an effective way to protect public health by providing an early warning againstharmful air pollutants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, a model W-BPNN using wavelet technique and back propagationneural network (BPNN) is developed and tested to forecast daily air pollutants (PM10, SO2, and NO2)concentrations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the W-BPNN model has better forecasting performance for thethree air pollutants than mono-BPNN model in terms of the statistics indexes (mean absolute percentageerror, root mean square error and correlation coefficient criteria) and the forecasting accuracy of thenumber of relevant days of individual air quality index.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Air quality forecasting is an effective way to protect public health by providing an early warning againstharmful air pollutants. In this paper, a model W-BPNN using wavelet technique and back propagationneural network (BPNN) is developed and tested to forecast daily air pollutants (PM10, SO2, and NO2)concentrations. Firstly, stationary wavelet transform (SWT) is applied to decompose historical time seriesof daily air pollutants concentrations into different scales, of which the information represents waveletcoefficients of air pollutant concentration. Secondly, the wavelet coefficients are used to train a BPNNmodel at each scale. The input data for forecasting contain the wavelet coefficients of the air pollutantsconcentrations 1-day in advance, and local meteorological data. The suitable groups of the input variablesare determined by correlation analysis method. At last, the estimated coefficients of the BPNNoutputs for all of the scales are employed to reconstruct the forecasting result through the inverse SWT.The proposed approach is tested using data during 1/1/2011 to 26/12/2011 in Nan'an District ofChongqing, China. The results show that the W-BPNN model has better forecasting performance for thethree air pollutants than mono-BPNN model in terms of the statistics indexes (mean absolute percentageerror, root mean square error and correlation coefficient criteria) and the forecasting accuracy of thenumber of relevant days of individual air quality index.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAİ, Y., LI, Y., WANG, X., XİE, J., Lİ, C. (2016). Air pollutants concentrations forecasting using back propagation neural network based on wavelet decomposition with meteorological conditions. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 557–566. https://ajindex.com/articles/351513

References (1)

  1. Ababneh, M.F., AL-Manaseer, A.O., Btoush, M.H., 2014. PM10 forecasting using soft computing techniques. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 7, 3253e3265. Antanasijevic, D.Z., Ristic, M., Peric-Grujic, A., Pocajt, V., 2013. Forecasting human exposure to PM10 at the national level using an artificial neural network approach. J. Chemom. 27, 170e177. Bai, Y., Wang, P., Li, C., Xie, J., Wang, Y., 2014. A multi-scale relevance vector regression approach for daily urban water demand forecasting. J. Hydrol. 517, 236e245. Chaudhuri, S., Acharya, R., 2012. Artificial neural network model to forecast the concentration of pollutants over Delhi: skill assessment of learning rules. Asian J. Water Environ. Pollut. 1, 71e81. Chen, J., Lu, J., Avise, J.C., DaMassa, J.A., Kleeman, M.J., Kaduwela, A.P., 2014. Seasonal modeling of PM2.5 in California's San Joaquin Valley. Atmos. Environ. 92, 182e190. Chen, Y., Shi, R., Shu, S., Gao, W., 2013. Ensemble and enhanced PM10 concentration forecast model based on stepwise regression and wavelet analysis. Atmos. Environ. 74, 346e359. Chuang, M.T., Zhang, Y., Kang, D., 2011. Application of WRF/Chem-MADRID for realtime air quality forecasting over the Southeastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 45, 6241e6250. Corporation, H.P., 2013. Forecasting SO2 pollution incidents by means of Elman artificial neural networks and ARIMA models. Abstr. Appl. Analysis 4, 1728e1749. Daszykowski, M., Serneels, S., Kaczmarek, K., Van Espen, P., Croux, C., Walczak, B., 2007. TOMACT: a MATLAB toolbox for multivariate calibration techniques. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 85, 269e277. Djalalova, I., Monache, L.D., Wilczak, J., 2015. PM2.5 analog forecast and Kalman filter post-processing for the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Atmos. Environ. 108, 76e87. Domanska, D., Woktylak, M., 2012. Application of fuzzy time series models for forecasting pollution concentrations. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 7673e7679. Elangasinghe, M.A., Singhal, N., Dirks, K.N., Salmond, J.A., 2014. Development of an ANNebased air pollution forecasting system with explicit knowledge through sensitivity analysis. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 5, 696e708. Feng, X., Li, Q., Zhu, Y., Hou, J., Jin, L., Wang, J., 2015. Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation. Atmos. Environ. 107, 118e128. Feng, Y., Zhang, W., Sun, D., Zhang, L., 2011. Ozone concentration forecast method based on genetic algorithm optimize