Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Source apportionment with uncertainty estimates of fine particulate matter in Ostrava, Czech Republic using Positive Matrix Factorization

Pages
503–512
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Apportionment of regulated individualspecies is also presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A 14-week investigation during a warm and cold seasons was conducted to improve understanding of airpollution sources that might be impacting air quality in Ostrava, the Czech Republic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fine particulatematter (PM2.5) samples were collected in consecutive 12-h day and night increments during spring andfall 2012 sampling campaigns.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Apportionment of regulated individualspecies is also presented.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 · 2.5 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

A 14-week investigation during a warm and cold seasons was conducted to improve understanding of airpollution sources that might be impacting air quality in Ostrava, the Czech Republic. Fine particulatematter (PM2.5) samples were collected in consecutive 12-h day and night increments during spring andfall 2012 sampling campaigns. Sampling sites were strategically located to evaluate conditions in closeproximity of a large steel works industrial complex, as well as away from direct influence of theindustrial complex. These samples were analyzed for metals and other elements, organic and elemental(black) carbon, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The PM2.5 samples were supplementedwith pollutant gases and meteorological parameters. We applied the EPA PMF v5.1 model with uncertaintyestimate features to the Ostrava data set. Using the model's bootstrapping procedure and otherconsiderations, six factors were determined to provide the optimum solution. Each model run consistedof 100 iterations to ensure that the solution represents a global minimum. The resulting factors wereidentified as representing coal (power plants), mixed Cl, crustal, industrial 1 (alkali metals and PAHs),industrial 2 (transition metals), and home heat/transportation. The home heating source is thought to belargely domestic boilers burning low quality fuels such as lignite, wood, and domestic waste.Transportation-related combustion emissions could not be resolved as a separate factor. Uncertaintyestimates support the general conclusion that the factors identified as representing coal power and homeheat/transportation dominate the percent contribution to fine mass. Apportionment of regulated individualspecies is also presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

VOSSLER, T., CERNİKOVSKÝ, L., NOVAK, J., WİLLİAMS, R. (2016). Source apportionment with uncertainty estimates of fine particulate matter in Ostrava, Czech Republic using Positive Matrix Factorization. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 503–512. https://ajindex.com/articles/351510

References (4)

  1. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 1995. Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA. Brown, S., Eberly, S., Paatero, P., Norris, G., 2015. Methods for estimating uncertainty in PMF solutions: examples with ambient air and water quality data and guidance on reporting PMF results. Sci. Total Environ. 518e519, 626e635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.022.
  2. Chow, J., Watson, J., Chen, L., Rice, J., Frank, N., 2010. Quantification of PM2.5 organic carbon sampling artifacts in US networks. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 5223e5239. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2014. European Union Emission Inventory Report 1990e2012 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). Technical report No 12/2014. http://www.eea.europa.eu// publications/lrtap-2014 (accessed September 2014). European Commission, 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/ standards.htm, (accessed May 2015).
  3. Farao, C., Canepari, S., Perrino, C., Harrison, R., 2014. Sources of PM in an industrial area: comparison between receptor model results and semi-empirical calculations of source contributions. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 14, 1558e1572. Harrison, R., Smith, D., Luhana, L., 1996. Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, U.K. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 825e832. Junninen, H., Mønster, J., Rey, M., Cancelinha, J., Douglas, K., Duane, M., Forcino, V., Müller, A., Lagler, F., Marelli, L., Borowiak, A., Niedzialek, J., Paradiz, B., MiraSalama, D., Jiminez, J., Hansen, U., Astorga, C., Stanczyk, K., Viana, M., Querol, X., Duvall, R., Norris, G., Tsakovski, S., Wåhlin, P., Horak, J., Larsen, B., 2009. Quantifying the impact of residential heating on the urban air quality in a typical European coal combustion region. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 7964e7970. Khalili, N., Scheff, P., Holsen, T., 1995. PAH source fingerprints for coke ovens, diesel and gasoline engines, highway tunnels, and wood combustion emissions. Atmos. Environ. 29, 533e542. Larsen, R., Baker, J., 2003. Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere: a comparison of three methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 1873e1881. Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic, 2013. http://www.mzp.cz/en/ air_protection, (accessed September 2014).
  4. Norris, G., Duvall, R., Brown, S