Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Time series analysis of aerosol optical depth over New Delhi using BoxeJenkins ARIMA modeling approach

Pages
585–596
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Satisfactory results have been obtained using the selected ARIMA models,suggesting that a simplistic modeling technique for determining the future values of AOD is feasible.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study focuses on the application of stochastic modeling technique in analyzing the futuretrends of aerosol optical properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this, the BoxeJenkins ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated MovingAverage) model has been used for simulating the monthly average Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD550 nm)retrieved from Terra MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) over New Delhi, theurban capital of India.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Satisfactory results have been obtained using the selected ARIMA models,suggesting that a simplistic modeling technique for determining the future values of AOD is feasible.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The present study focuses on the application of stochastic modeling technique in analyzing the futuretrends of aerosol optical properties. For this, the BoxeJenkins ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated MovingAverage) model has been used for simulating the monthly average Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD550 nm)retrieved from Terra MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) over New Delhi, theurban capital of India. The satellite dataset has been collected for a period of ten years from 2004 to 2014.The analysis of autocorrelation function indicates existence of seasonality in the AOD time series. Severalseasonal ARIMA models have been generated and their validation has been verified by assessing variousestimation parameters, using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 20). Afterrigorous evaluation of the selected models, the ARIMA (1,0,0)x(0,1,2)12 is identified as the best fit modelw.r.t. measures of goodness-of-fit like Stationary R-square (0.530), R-square (0.674), Root Mean SquaredError (0.128); Mean Absolute Error (0.095); Mean Absolute Percentage Error (16.942); and normalizedBayesian Information Criteria (3.941). The selected models have been further used to forecast AODvalues for the year 2014 at 95% level of confidence. However, the ARIMA (1,0,0)x(2,1,1)12 model is foundto have minimum forecasting error, calculated as Mean Percentage Error (0.220). As the difference in BICof both the models is minimal (0.046), so both the models have been considered as best fit models andutilized for prediction of AOD. Satisfactory results have been obtained using the selected ARIMA models,suggesting that a simplistic modeling technique for determining the future values of AOD is feasible.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANEJA, K., AHMAD, S., AHMAD, K., ATTRİ, S. (2016). Time series analysis of aerosol optical depth over New Delhi using BoxeJenkins ARIMA modeling approach. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 585–596. https://ajindex.com/articles/351502

References (2)

  1. Abish, B., Mohanakumar, K., 2013. A stochastic model for predicting aerosol optical depth over the north Indian region. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 1449e1458. Ahmad, S., Khan, I.H., Parida, B.P., 2002. Performance of stochastic approaches for forecasting river water quality. Water Res. 35 (18), 4261e4266. Attri, S.D., Tyagi, A., 2010. Climate Profile of India. Contribution to the Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment (National Communication-II). Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., Reinsel, G.C., 1994. Time Series Analysis e Forecasting and Control, third ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Cadenas, E., Rivera, W., 2010. Wind speed forecasting in three different regions of Mexico, using a hybrid ARIMA-ANN model. Renew. Energy 35, 2732e2738. Charlson, R.J., Schwartz, S.E., Heles, J.M., Cess, R.D., Coakley Jr., J.A., Hansen, J.E., Hoffman, D.J., 1992. Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols. Science 255, 423e430. Chattopadhyay, G., Chattopadhyay, S., 2009. Autoregressive forecast of monthly total ozone concentrationda neurocomputing approach. Comput. Geosci. 35, 1925e1932.
  2. Chattopadhyay, S., Chattopadhyay, G., 2010. Univariate modelling of summermonsoon rainfall time series: comparison between ARIMA and ARNN. CR Geoscience 342, 100e107. Chaudhuri, S., Dutta, D., 2014. ManneKendall trend of pollutants, temperature and humidity over an urban station of India with forecast verification using different ARIMA models. Environ. Monit. Assess. 186 (8), 4719e4742. Chu, D.A., Kaufman, Y.J., Ichoku, C., Remer, L.A., Tanre, D., Holben, B.N., 2002. Vali- dation of MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval over land. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1617e1621. de Meij, A., Lelieveld, J., 2011. Evaluating aerosol optical properties observed by ground-based and satellite remote sensing over the Mediterranean and the Middle East in 2006. Atmos. Res. 99, 415e433. Dey, S., Di Girolamo, L., 2011. A decade of change in aerosol properties over the Indian subcontinent. Geophys. Res. Lett. L14811. Feng, N., Christopher, S.A., 2013. Satellite and surface-based remote sensing of Southeast Asian aerosols and their radiative effects. Atmos. Res. 122, 544e554. Holben, B.N., Eck, T.F., Slutsker, I.D., Tanre, D., Buis, J.P., Setzer, A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J.A., Kaufman, Y.J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., Smirnov, A., 1998. AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization. Remote Sens. Environ.