Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Light absorption characteristics of brown carbon during foggy and nonfoggy episodes over the Indo-Gangetic Plain

Pages
494–501
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Differences in chemical composition, loading, absorption properties anddirect radiative forcing (DRF) of carbonaceous aerosols during non-foggy and foggy episodes indicate predominantinfluence of fog-processing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Atmospheric PM1 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 1 μm) samples have been collected duringfoggy (n = 17) and non-foggy nights (n = 19) in wintertime at Kanpur in central Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) toassess light absorption characteristics and direct radiative forcing of water-extractable brown carbon (BrC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Wehave observed a significant enhancement (two-tailed t-test: t = 2.2; at significance level: p < 0.05) in theabsorption coefficient of water-extractable BrC at 365 nm (babs-BrC-365) from non-foggy (Avg.: 53.5 Mm−1) tofoggy episodes (69.3 Mm−1).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Differences in chemical composition, loading, absorption properties anddirect radiative forcing (DRF) of carbonaceous aerosols during non-foggy and foggy episodes indicate predominantinfluence of fog-processing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Atmospheric PM1 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 1 μm) samples have been collected duringfoggy (n = 17) and non-foggy nights (n = 19) in wintertime at Kanpur in central Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) toassess light absorption characteristics and direct radiative forcing of water-extractable brown carbon (BrC). Wehave observed a significant enhancement (two-tailed t-test: t = 2.2; at significance level: p < 0.05) in theabsorption coefficient of water-extractable BrC at 365 nm (babs-BrC-365) from non-foggy (Avg.: 53.5 Mm−1) tofoggy episodes (69.3 Mm−1). Enhancement in mass absorption efficiency (MAE) of BrC (1.8 m2/g C) duringfoggy episodes is consistent with that of babs-BrC-365. Absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) remained similar (2.8)during foggy and non-foggy episodes. Significantly lower value of AAE (2.8) at Kanpur compared to other placesin IGP (∼5) highlights more light absorbing potential of atmospheric BrC over central IGP. Furthermore, MAE ofEC at 660 nm during foggy period (8.5 m2/g) is relatively high as compared to that during the non-foggy episode(7.0 m2/g). The MAE of BrC and EC exhibited enhancement by ∼15% and 20%, respectively during foggyevents. These observations are also reflected by an increase (t = 11.1; p < 0.05) in direct radiative forcing ofwater-extractable BrC (relative to EC) in the atmosphere: from 23.7 ± 10.8% during non-foggy to54.3 ± 16.5% during foggy episodes. Differences in chemical composition, loading, absorption properties anddirect radiative forcing (DRF) of carbonaceous aerosols during non-foggy and foggy episodes indicate predominantinfluence of fog-processing.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHOUDHARY, V., RAJPUT, P., SİNGH, D. K., SİNGH, A. K., GUPTA, T. (2018). Light absorption characteristics of brown carbon during foggy and nonfoggy episodes over the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 494–501. https://ajindex.com/articles/351478

References (14)

  1. Andreae, M.O., 1983. Soot carbon and excess fine potassium: long-range transport of combustion-derived aerosols. Science 220, 1148–1151.
  2. Andreae, M.O., Gelencser, A., 2006. Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of lightabsorbing carbonaceous aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 3419–3463.
  3. Andreae, M.O., Merlet, P., 2001. Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 955–966.
  4. Artaxo, P., Martins, J.V., Yamasoe, M.A., Procópio, A.S., Pauliquevis, T.M., Andreae, M.O., Guyon, P., Gatti, L.V., Leal, A.M.C., 2002. Physical and chemical properties of aerosols in the wet and dry seasons in Rondônia, Amazonia. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 107 LBA 49-41-LBA 49–14.
  5. Birch, M.E., Cary, R.A., 1996. Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 25, 221–241.
  6. Bond, T.C., Bergstrom, R.W., 2006. Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: an investigative review. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 40, 27–67.
  7. Castro, L.M., Pio, C.A., Harrison, R.M., Smith, D.J.T., 1999. Carbonaceous aerosol in urban and rural European atmospheres: estimation of secondary organic carbon concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 33, 2771–2781.
  8. Chakraborty, A., Ervens, B., Gupta, T., Tripathi, S.N., 2016a. Characterization of organic residues of size-resolved fog droplets and their atmospheric implications. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 121, 4317–4332.
  9. Chakraborty, A., Gupta, T., 2010. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of submicron (PM1) aerosol in kanpur region. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 10, 433–445.
  10. Chakraborty, A., Gupta, T., Tripathi, S.N., 2016b. Combined effects of organic aerosol loading and fog processing on organic aerosols oxidation, composition, and evolution. Sci. Total Environ. 573, 690–698.
  11. Chakraborty, A., Rajeev, P., Rajput, P., Gupta, T., 2017. Water soluble organic aerosols in indo gangetic plain (IGP): insights from aerosol mass spectrometry. Sci. Total Environ. 599, 1573–1582.
  12. Chen, Y., Bond, T.C., 2010. Light absorption by organic carbon from wood combustion. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 1773–1787.
  13. Cheng, Y., He, K.-b., Du, Z.-y., Engling, G., Liu, J.-m., Ma, Y.-l., Zheng, M., Weber, R.J., 2016. The characteristics of brown carbon aerosol during winter in Beijing. Atmos. Environ. 127, 355–364.
  14. Cheng, Y., He, K.-b., Engling, G., Weber, R., Liu, J.-m., Du, Z.-y., Dong, S.-p., 2017. Brown and black carbon in Beijing aerosol: implications for the effects of brown coating on light absorpt