Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6

A hybrid-wavelet model applied for forecasting PM2.5 concentrations in Taiyuan city, China

Pages
1884–1894
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most accurate SVM-wavelet model had an MAE thatdecreased from 10.8347 to 5.7195 to 9.4041 and 5.1401 respectively for the data of 2016 and 2017.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of this study is to apply hybrid-wavelet models developed by combining artificial intelligence(AI) techniques and wavelet transforms to the prediction of PM2.5 concentrations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hourly data of PM2.5concentrations of two years are decomposed with wavelet transforms including db4, db6, db9, coif4, haar, sym3and dmey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most accurate SVM-wavelet model had an MAE thatdecreased from 10.8347 to 5.7195 to 9.4041 and 5.1401 respectively for the data of 2016 and 2017.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The main objective of this study is to apply hybrid-wavelet models developed by combining artificial intelligence(AI) techniques and wavelet transforms to the prediction of PM2.5 concentrations. As a representative of energyand industrial cities in Northern China, Taiyuan is taken under consideration in this study. Hourly data of PM2.5concentrations of two years are decomposed with wavelet transforms including db4, db6, db9, coif4, haar, sym3and dmey. Then, the high-dimensional input vectors of AI models are constructed with factors selected byneighborhood mutual information (NMI) which are highly correlated with PM2.5 concentrations. In the hybridmodels, the AI models are back propagation neural network (BPNN) models representing the artificial neuralnetwork (ANN) model and support vector regression (SVR) models representing the support vector machine(SVM) regression algorithm. To evaluate the model accuracy, the results obtained by these hybrid-waveletmodels are compared with the results of single ANN and SVM. A comparison of the performance indicators of themodels indicates that the results of the hybrid models are more accurate and stable. The MAE (mean absoluteerror) of the best ANN-wavelet model with regard to the 2016 ANN model decreased by 39.79% and in theoptimized case for 2017, it decreased by 41.95%. The most accurate SVM-wavelet model had an MAE thatdecreased from 10.8347 to 5.7195 to 9.4041 and 5.1401 respectively for the data of 2016 and 2017.

🔖

Cite This Article

WANG, P., Zhang, G., CHEN, D. F., HE, Y. Y. (2019). A hybrid-wavelet model applied for forecasting PM2.5 concentrations in Taiyuan city, China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6, 1884–1894. https://ajindex.com/articles/351466

References (8)

  1. Agirre-Basurko, E., Ibarra-Berastegi, G., Madariaga, I., 2006. Regression and multilayer perceptron-based models to forecast hourly O3 and NO2 levels in the bilbao area. Environ. Model. Softw 21 (4), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.07. 008. Alizadeh, M.J., Kavianpour, M.R., 2015. Development of wavelet-ANN models to predict water quality parameters in Hilo Bay, Pacific Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 98 (1), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.052.
  2. Belayneh, A., Adamowski, J., Khalil, B., Ozga-Zielinski, B., 2014. Long-term SPI drought forecasting in the Awash River Basin in Ethiopia using wavelet neural network and wavelet support vector regression models. J. Hydrol. 508, 418–429. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.052. Bento, P., Pombo, J., Calado, M., Mariano, S., 2018. A bat optimized neural network and wavelet transform approach for short-term price forecasting. Appl. Energy 210, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.058.
  3. Burnett, R.T., Pope, C.A., Ezzati, M., Olives, C., Lim, S.S., Mehta, S., Shin, H.H., Singh, G., Hubbell, B., Brauer, M., Anderson, R.H., Smith, K.R., Balmes, J.R., Bruce, N.G., Kan, H., Laden, L.F., Prüss-Ustün, A., Turner, M.C., Gapstur, S.M., Diver, W.R., Cohen, A., 2014. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307049.
  4. Chen, Y., Shi, R., Shu, S., Gao, W., 2013. Ensemble and enhanced PM10 concentration forecast model based on stepwise regression and wavelet analysis. Atmos. Environ. 74, 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.002.
  5. Cobourn, W.G., 2010. An enhanced PM2.5 air quality forecast model based on nonlinear regression and back-trajectory concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 44 (25), 3015–3023.
  6. Dai, W., Gao, J., Cao, G., Ouyang, F., 2013. Chemical composition and source identification of PM2.5 in the suburb of Shenzhen, China. Atmos. Res. 122, 391–400.
  7. Dunea, D., Pohoata, A., Iordache, S., 2015. Using wavelet–feedforward neural networks to improve air pollution forecasting in urban environments. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4697-x.
  8. Eseye, A.T., Zhang, J., Zheng, D., 2018. Short-term photovoltaic solar power forecasting using a hybrid Wavelet-PSO-SVM model based on SCADA and meteorological information. Renew. Energy 118, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11. 011. Fe