Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6

Size distributions and size-segregated chemical profiles of particulate matter in a traffic tunnel of East-Central China

Pages
1873–1883
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

OCproportion in this study was approximately 0.5, 0.2 and 1 times relative to those in other three tunnels, and ECwas 0.1, 0.4 and 0.2 times relative to those in other tunnels, which depended on traffic fleet and vehicle types.The crustal elements in this tunnel showed higher content than those in other tunnels, illustrating the localdifferences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Size distributions for number and mass concentrations, size-segregated chemical compositions and chemicalprofiles of particulate matter (PM) were determined at two sampling sites (SP1 and SP2) in a traffic tunnel ofEast-Central China.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Particle size distributions of number concentration presented single large peaks at 6–17 nmand inconspicuous peaks around 100 nm on each day, with peak phenomenon in line with rush hours.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:OCproportion in this study was approximately 0.5, 0.2 and 1 times relative to those in other three tunnels, and ECwas 0.1, 0.4 and 0.2 times relative to those in other tunnels, which depended on traffic fleet and vehicle types.The crustal elements in this tunnel showed higher content than those in other tunnels, illustrating the localdifferences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Size distributions for number and mass concentrations, size-segregated chemical compositions and chemicalprofiles of particulate matter (PM) were determined at two sampling sites (SP1 and SP2) in a traffic tunnel ofEast-Central China. Particle size distributions of number concentration presented single large peaks at 6–17 nmand inconspicuous peaks around 100 nm on each day, with peak phenomenon in line with rush hours. Particlemass distributions showed high concentrations with particle diameters in the last stage (6800–10000 nm). Forsize-segregated particles, PM mass concentration in 1.1–2.1 μm was found to be high, and particles smaller than2.1 μm (PM2.1) accounted for 43% (SP1) and 37% (SP2) of particles smaller than 10 μm (PM10). PM in3.3–4.7 μm size range was also high for SP2 (accounting for 15% of PM10). High organic carbon (OC), NH4+, K+,Cl−, NO3−, and SO42− concentration were observed in PM2.1, and Mg2+, Ca2+, and F− in size range of2.1–10 μm was high. For fine particle (PM2.5) profiles, average mass concentrations of PM2.5 were 199±63 and247±45 μgm−3 for SP1 and SP2. OC was the highest constituent, followed by SO42− and then NO3− for SP2,while SO42− and NO3− were higher than OC for SP1. OC and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations for SP2 werehigher than those for SP1. Comparing to other tunnel studies, PM2.5 mass concentration at SP2 was similar tothat of Shing Mun Tunnel, but 6 and 4 times higher than those of Loma Larga Tunnel and Chung-Liao Tunnel. OCproportion in this study was approximately 0.5, 0.2 and 1 times relative to those in other three tunnels, and ECwas 0.1, 0.4 and 0.2 times relative to those in other tunnels, which depended on traffic fleet and vehicle types.The crustal elements in this tunnel showed higher content than those in other tunnels, illustrating the localdifferences.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHE, L. D., Jiang, N., DUAN, S., ZHANG, L., Lİ, S., Zhang, R. (2019). Size distributions and size-segregated chemical profiles of particulate matter in a traffic tunnel of East-Central China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6, 1873–1883. https://ajindex.com/articles/351465

References (11)

  1. Abdul-Khalek, I.S., Kittelson, D.B., Graskow, B.R., Wei, Q., Bear, F., 1998. Diesel exhaust particle size: measurement issues and trends. SAE Technical Papers. https://doi.org/ 10.4271/980525. Abu-Allaban, M., Coulomb, W., Gertler, A.W., Gillies, J., Pierson, W.R., Rogers, C.F., Sagebiel, J.C., Tarnay, L., 2002. Exhaust particle size distribution measurements at the tuscarora mountain tunnel. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36, 771–789.
  2. Alves, C.A., Gomes, J., Nunes, T., Duarte, M., Calvo, A., Custódio, D., Pio, C., Karanasiou, A., Querol, X., 2015. Size-segregated particulate matter and gaseous emissions from motor vehicles in a road tunnel. Atmos. Res. 153, 134–144.
  3. Alves, C.A., Oliveira, C., Martins, N., Mirante, F., Caseiro, A., Pio, C., Matos, M., Silva, H.F., Oliveira, C., Camões, F., 2016. Road tunnel, roadside, and urban background measurements of aliphatic compounds in size-segregated particulate matter. Atmos. Res. 168, 139–148.
  4. Bozlaker, A., Spada, N.J., Fraser, M.P., Chellam, S., 2014. Elemental characterization of PM2.5 and PM10 emitted from light duty vehicles in the Washburn Tunnel of Houston, Texas: release of rhodium, palladium, and platinum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 54–62.
  5. Brugge, D., Durant, J.L., Rioux, C., 2007. Near-highway pollutants in motor vehicle exhaust: a review of epidemiologic evidence of cardiac and pulmonary health risks. Environ. Health 6, 1–12.
  6. Bukowiecki, N., Lienemann, P., Hill, M., Furger, M., Richard, A., Amato, F., Prevot, A.S.H., Baltensperger, U., Buchmann, B., Gehrig, R., 2010. PM10 emission factors for non-exhaust particles generated by road traffic in an urban street canyon and along a freeway in Switzerland. Atmos. Environ. 44, 2330–2340.
  7. Chen, L.W.A., Watson, J.G., Chow, J.C., DuBois, D.W., Herschberger, L., 2010. Chemical mass balance source apportionment for combined PM2.5 measurements from US nonurban and urban long-term networks. Atmos. Environ. 44, 4908–4918.
  8. Cheng, Y., Lee, S.C., Ho, K.F., Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Louie, P.K.K., Cao, J.J., Hai, X., 2010. Chemically-speciated on-road PM2.5 motor vehicle emission factors in Hong Kong. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 1621–1627.
  9. Chiang, H.-L., Huang, Y.-S., 2009. Particulate matter emissions from on-road vehicles in a freeway tunnel study. Atmos. Environ. 43, 4014–4022.
  10. Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Edgerton, S.A., Vega, E., 2002. Chemical composition of PM10 and PM2.5 in Mexico City during winter 1997. Sci. Total Environ. 287, 177–201.
  11. Geller, M.D., Sardar, S.B., Phuleria, H