Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6

Assessment of aerosol types on improving the estimation of surface PM2.5 concentrations by using ground-based aerosol optical depth dataset

Pages
1843–1851
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that the average determination coefficient (R2) ofthe ACM-MRM (0.52) was greater than that of the MRM (0.44), while the root mean square error (RMSE) andmean absolute percent error (MAPE) of the ACM-MRM (3.74 μg/m3 and 34.91%, respectively) were lower thanthe values obtained with the MRM (4.09 μg/m3 and 37.64%, respectively).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the influence of aerosol type classification on estimating surface PM2.5 concentrations was assessedby using ground-based aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 22 ground-based observation points in the United States.To clarify the influence, a two-stage model consisting of a multiple regression model (MRM) and an aerosolclassification model (ACM) was proposed to estimate surface PM2.5 concentrations, and results from a traditionalMRM and the new ACM-MRM were compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results show that the average determination coefficient (R2) ofthe ACM-MRM (0.52) was greater than that of the MRM (0.44), while the root mean square error (RMSE) andmean absolute percent error (MAPE) of the ACM-MRM (3.74 μg/m3 and 34.91%, respectively) were lower thanthe values obtained with the MRM (4.09 μg/m3 and 37.64%, respectively).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further analysis demonstrated that aerosol type changes had adverse influenceson the estimation of short-term PM2.5 concentrations and the introduction of ACM can effectively restrain theadverse influences when aerosols change frequently.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, the influence of aerosol type classification on estimating surface PM2.5 concentrations was assessedby using ground-based aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 22 ground-based observation points in the United States.To clarify the influence, a two-stage model consisting of a multiple regression model (MRM) and an aerosolclassification model (ACM) was proposed to estimate surface PM2.5 concentrations, and results from a traditionalMRM and the new ACM-MRM were compared. Results show that the average determination coefficient (R2) ofthe ACM-MRM (0.52) was greater than that of the MRM (0.44), while the root mean square error (RMSE) andmean absolute percent error (MAPE) of the ACM-MRM (3.74 μg/m3 and 34.91%, respectively) were lower thanthe values obtained with the MRM (4.09 μg/m3 and 37.64%, respectively). The use of ACM improved the estimationof daily PM2.5 concentrations in different regions and different seasons by reducing the deviationscaused by aerosol type changes. Further analysis demonstrated that aerosol type changes had adverse influenceson the estimation of short-term PM2.5 concentrations and the introduction of ACM can effectively restrain theadverse influences when aerosols change frequently.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHEN, Q., HUANG, C., XIAO, Y. Y., MAO, Q., TAN, H. (2019). Assessment of aerosol types on improving the estimation of surface PM2.5 concentrations by using ground-based aerosol optical depth dataset. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6, 1843–1851. https://ajindex.com/articles/351464

References (9)

  1. Barnaba, F., Gobbi, G.P., 2004. Aerosol seasonal variability over the Mediterranean region and relative impact of maritime, continental and Saharan dust particles over the basin from MODIS data in the year 2001. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 2367–2391.
  2. Beckerman, B.S., Jerrett, M., Serre, M., Martin, R.V., Lee, S.J., van Donkelaar, A., Ross, Z., Su, J., Burnett, R.T., 2013. A hybrid approach to estimating national scale spatiotemporal variability of PM2.5 in the contiguous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 7233–7241.
  3. Brock, C.A., Wagner, N.L., Anderson, B.E., Attwood, A.R., Beyersdorf, A., Campuzano- Jost, P., Carlton, A.G., Day, D.A., Diskin, G.S., Gordon, T.D., Jimenez, J.L., Lack, D.A., Liao, J., Markovic, M.Z., Middlebrook, A.M., Ng, N.L., Perring, A.E., Richardson, M.S., Schwarz, J.P., Washenfelder, R.A., Welti, A., Xu, L., Ziemba, L.D., Murphy, D.M., 2016a. Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer - Part 1: hygroscopic growth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 4987–5007.
  4. Brock, C.A., Wagner, N.L., Anderson, B.E., Beyersdorf, A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D.A., Diskin, G.S., Gordon, T.D., Jimenez, J.L., Lack, D.A., Liao, J., Markovic, M.Z., Middlebrook, A.M., Perring, A.E., Richardson, M.S., Schwarz, J.P., Welti, A., Ziemba, L.D., Murphy, D.M., 2016b. Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer - Part 2: sensitivity of aerosol optical depth to relative humidity and aerosol parameters. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 5009–5019.
  5. Carnevale, C., Finzi, G., Pederzoli, A., Turrini, E., Volta, M., 2016. Lazy Learning based surrogate models for air quality planning. Environ. Model. Softw 83, 47–57.
  6. Chemel, C., Fisher, B.E.A., Kong, X., Francis, X.V., Sokhi, R.S., Good, N., Collins, W.J., Folberth, G.A., 2014. Application of chemical transport model CMAQ to policy decisions regarding PM2.5 in the UK. Atmos. Environ. 82, 410–417.
  7. Chen, L., Shi, M.S., Li, S.H., Bai, Z.P., Wang, Z.L., 2017a. Combined use of land use regression and BenMAP for estimating public health benefits of reducing PM2.5 in Tianjin, China. Atmos. Environ. 152, 16–23.
  8. Chen, Q.-X., Shen, W.-X., Yuan, Y., Tan, H.-P., 2019a. Verification of aerosol classification methods through satellite and ground-based measurements over Harbin, Northeast China. Atmos. Res. 216, 167–175.
  9. Chen, Q., Yuan, Y., Huang, X., He, Z., Tan, H., 2018. Assessment of column aerosol optical properties using ground-based sun-photometer at urban Harbin, Northeast China. J. Environ. Sci. 74,