Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Developing a statistical based approach for predicting local air quality in complex terrain area

Pages
114–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even with theuncertainties in weather predictions, it was found that, downscaled weather forecasts from ImprovedGFS-WRF combined with GAMs give better results than those based on GFS and GFS-WRF alone.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A statistical framework has been developed for predicting the next-day air quality for Hong Kong.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In thisapproach, Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) linking air pollutant concentration with meteorologicaldata were first constructed, based on observations during the December 1997 to November 2009 period.GAMs were used for forecasting local air quality with weather predictions from (1) the Global ForecastSystem (GFS) model; (2) dynamical downscaling of GFS predictions using WRF model (GFS-WRF), and (3)bias corrected GFS-WRF (Improved GFS-WRF).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even with theuncertainties in weather predictions, it was found that, downscaled weather forecasts from ImprovedGFS-WRF combined with GAMs give better results than those based on GFS and GFS-WRF alone.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

A statistical framework has been developed for predicting the next-day air quality for Hong Kong. In thisapproach, Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) linking air pollutant concentration with meteorologicaldata were first constructed, based on observations during the December 1997 to November 2009 period.GAMs were used for forecasting local air quality with weather predictions from (1) the Global ForecastSystem (GFS) model; (2) dynamical downscaling of GFS predictions using WRF model (GFS-WRF), and (3)bias corrected GFS-WRF (Improved GFS-WRF). The system was verified by carrying out retrospectivedaily air quality predictions in this one-year period (December 2009 to November 2010). Even with theuncertainties in weather predictions, it was found that, downscaled weather forecasts from ImprovedGFS-WRF combined with GAMs give better results than those based on GFS and GFS-WRF alone. Thestatistical model with Improved GFS-WRF inputs performed well in forecasting both urban and suburban pollutant concentrations including respirable suspended particulates, O3 and NO2. The Hit Rate(False Alarm Ratio) for categorical forecasts of events with daily air pollution index (API) over 100 givenby Improved GFS-WRF is also higher (or possibly lower) than that using GFS and GFS-WRF only. Further,this paper describes the implementation of Improved GFS-WRF to detect the onset of O3 episodes inadvance due to the presence of tropical cyclones, based on categorical evaluation and supported by casestudies. Our results indicate that the statistical model can be a useful tool for air quality prediction forurban and sub-urban sites in the complex terrain area, like Hong Kong.

🔖

Cite This Article

KWOK, L., LAM, Y., TAM, C. (2017). Developing a statistical based approach for predicting local air quality in complex terrain area. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 114–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/351403

References (8)

  1. Camalier, L., Cox, W., Dolwick, P., 2007. The effects of meteorology on ozone in urban areas and their use in assessing ozone trends. Atmos. Environ. 41, 7127-7137.
  2. Chan, C.Y., Chan, L.Y., 2000. Effect of meteorology and air pollutant transport on ozone episodes at a subtropical coastal Asian city, Hong Kong. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 105, 20707-20724.
  3. Cobourn, W.G., 2010. An enhanced PM2.5 air quality forecast model based on nonlinear regression and back-trajectory concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 44, 3015-3023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.009.
  4. Cobourn, W.G., 2007. Accuracy and reliability of an automated air quality forecast system for ozone in seven Kentucky metropolitan areas. Atmos. Environ. 41, 5863-5875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.024.
  5. Cobourn, W.G., Hubbard, M.C., 1999. An enhanced ozone forecasting model using air mass trajectory analysis. Atmos. Environ. 33, 4663-4674. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00240-X. Davis, J.M., Speckman, P., 1999. A model for predicting maximum and 8 h average ozone in Houston. Atmos. Environ. 33, 2487-2500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1352-2310(98)00320-3.
  6. Delle Monache, L., Deng, X., Zhou, Y., Stull, R., 2006. Ozone ensemble forecasts: 1. A new ensemble design. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1029/2005JD006310. Draxler, R.R., Stunder, B., Rolph, G.D., Stein, A., Taylor, A., 2012. HYSPLIT 4 User Guide Overview. Eder, B., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Yu, S., Otte, T., Pouliot, G., 2009. A performance evaluation of the national air quality forecast capability for the summer of 2007. Atmos. Environ. 43, 2312-2320.
  7. Eder, B., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Yu, S., Schere, K., 2006. An operational evaluation of the EtaeCMAQ air quality forecast model. Atmos. Environ. 40, 4894-4905.
  8. Fernando, H.J.S., Mammarella,M.C., Grandoni, G., Fedele, P., Di Marco, R., Dimitrova, R., Hyde, P., 2012. Forecasting PM10 in metropolitan areas: efficacy of neural networks. Environ. Pollut. 163, 62-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.envpol.2011.12.018. Fung, J.C.H., Lau, A.K.H., Lam, J.S.L., Yuan, Z., 2005. Observational and modeling analysis of a severe air pollution episode in western Hong Kong. J. Geophys. Res. 110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005105. D09105. Hastie, T.J., Tibshirani, R., 1990. Generalized additive models. Stat. Sci. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.05.004. Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department, n.d. Guidelines for Local-Scale Air Quality Assessment