Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Effects of emissions constraint on manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions considering capital constraint and financing

Pages
455–464
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that, when capital constraint is considered, there always exists the quantity of recycled product is insufficient, but whether or not the other two conditions appear the insufficiency of recycled products mainly depends on recovery rate and carbon price; When financing is considered and the corresponding recovery rate is high enough, the increased recovery rate decreases the carbon emissions and increases the total profit; Considering capital constraint, the carbon price and carbon cap have greater influences on manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions, and the increased carbon cap can weaken the capital constraint and bring manufacturers more profit.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Considering the different capital conditions (i.e. without capital constraint, with capital constraint, and with financing), this paper studies the manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions under emissions trading policy in a single period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results indicate that, when capital constraint is considered, there always exists the quantity of recycled product is insufficient, but whether or not the other two conditions appear the insufficiency of recycled products mainly depends on recovery rate and carbon price; When financing is considered and the corresponding recovery rate is high enough, the increased recovery rate decreases the carbon emissions and increases the total profit; Considering capital constraint, the carbon price and carbon cap have greater influences on manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions, and the increased carbon cap can weaken the capital constraint and bring manufacturers more profit.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the paper provides some applicable suggestions to manufacturers and policy-makers.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Considering the different capital conditions (i.e. without capital constraint, with capital constraint, and with financing), this paper studies the manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions under emissions trading policy in a single period. Three mathematical models are developed to determine manufacturing/ remanufacturing quantities that maximize total profits, which include sale revenue, revenue or expense of emissions trading, manufacturing/remanufacturing costs, and financing cost or interest revenue. Then, numerical example is provided to explore the comparison results on the optimal production quantities of new and remanufactured products, total profits and carbon emissions under different capital conditions and to analyze the impacts of parameters related to carbon emission, such as carbon price and carbon cap. The results indicate that, when capital constraint is considered, there always exists the quantity of recycled product is insufficient, but whether or not the other two conditions appear the insufficiency of recycled products mainly depends on recovery rate and carbon price; When financing is considered and the corresponding recovery rate is high enough, the increased recovery rate decreases the carbon emissions and increases the total profit; Considering capital constraint, the carbon price and carbon cap have greater influences on manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions, and the increased carbon cap can weaken the capital constraint and bring manufacturers more profit. Finally, the paper provides some applicable suggestions to manufacturers and policy-makers.

🔖

Cite This Article

Wang, Y., Chen, W. (2017). Effects of emissions constraint on manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions considering capital constraint and financing. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 455–464. https://ajindex.com/articles/351400

References (1)

  1. Zhang, G.T., Zhong, Y.G., Sun, H., Hu, J.S., Dai, G.X., 2015. Multi-period closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium with carbon emission constraints. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 104, 354e365. Zhang, B., Xu, L., 2013. Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 144 (1), 118e127. Yu, Y., Chen, F., 2016. Research on carbon emissions embodied in trade between China and South Korea. Atmos. Pollut. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.apr.2016.07.007. Yenipazarli, A., 2016. Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249 (1), 117e130. Yang, C.H., Liu, H.B., Ji, P., Ma, X., 2015. Optimal acquisition and remanufacturing policies for multi-product remanufacturing systems. J. Clean. Prod. 135 (1), 1571e1579. Wei, C.S., Li, Y.J., Cai, X.Q., 2011. Robust optimal policies of production and inventory with uncertain returns and demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 134 (2), 357e367. Wang, J., Zhao, J., Wang, X., 2011. Optimum policy in hybrid manufacturing/rema-nufacturing system. Comput. Ind. Eng. 60 (3), 411e419. Stavins, R., 2008. A Meaningful U.S. Cap-and-trade System to Address Climate Change. Harvard University. Working Paper, No. 2008/10. Srinivasa-Raghavan, N.R., Mishra, V.K., 2011. Short-term financing in a cash-constrained supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 134 (2), 407e412. Song, J.P., Leng, M.M., 2012. Analysis of the single-period problem under carbon emissions policies. In: Handbook of Newsvendor Problems: Models, Extensions and Applications. Springer, New York, pp. 297e313. Savaskan, R.C., Bhattachrya, S., Van Wassenhove, L.N., 2004. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manag. Sci. 50 (2), 239e252. Milaneza, B., Bührs, T., 2009. Extended producer responsibility in Brazil: the case of tyre waste. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (6), 608e615. Miao, Z., Mao, H., Fu, K., Wang, Y., 2016. Remanufacturing with trade-ins under carbon regulations. Comput. Oper. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cor.2016.03.014. Maslennikova, I., Foley, D., 2000. Xeroxs approach to sustainability. Interfaces 30 (3), 226e233. Liu, B.Y., Holmbom, M., Segerstedt, A., Chen, W.D., 2015. Effects of carbon emission regulations on remanufacturing decisions with limited information of demand distribution. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53 (2), 532e548. Li, X., Li, Y.J., Saghafian, S., 2013. A hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with random remanufacturing yield and market-drive