Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

A criticality index for air pollution monitors

Pages
482–487
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The removal of the monitor with the highest index value would have a significant effect on thenetwork compared to the impact of removing any of the other seven monitors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we develop a criticality index for air pollution monitoring networks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We apply theindex to an industrial air pollution monitoring network in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, which consists ofeight air pollution monitoring units measuring PM10.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The removal of the monitor with the highest index value would have a significant effect on thenetwork compared to the impact of removing any of the other seven monitors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this paper, we develop a criticality index for air pollution monitoring networks. The index quantifiesthe effect on the system of removing an air pollution monitor, which is calculated as a weighted sum ofthe differences between baseline values interpolated with historical data using the entire monitoring setand values interpolated with each monitor independently removed from the set. The interpolationprocedure tests for linear dependencies in the north-south and east-west direction and then universalkriging is selected when linear dependencies exist, otherwise ordinary kriging is applied. The index's costfunction is evaluated on a regular grid. The cost function includes a multiplication factor when falsepositivesor false-negatives above an air quality standard are introduced because of the removal of amonitor. The sensitivity analysis indicated the final index ranks were not sensitive to variations in themultiplication factors. The index captures the effects of wind direction in the study area. We apply theindex to an industrial air pollution monitoring network in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, which consists ofeight air pollution monitoring units measuring PM10. We find a large difference in the cost with aminimum of 91,087 to a maximum cost of 1,733,835 or 0.052 and 1.00, respectively, for the proposedindex. The removal of the monitor with the highest index value would have a significant effect on thenetwork compared to the impact of removing any of the other seven monitors.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADAMS, M. D., KANAROGLOU, P. S. (2016). A criticality index for air pollution monitors. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 482–487. https://ajindex.com/articles/351382

References (1)

  1. Adams, M.D., De Luca, P.F., Corr, D., Kanaroglou, P.S., 2012. Mobile air monitoring: measuring change in air quality in the city of Hamilton, 2005e2010. Soc. Indic. Res. 108, 351e364. Adams, M.D., Kanaroglou, P.S., 2015. A method for reducing classical error in longterm average air pollution concentrations from incomplete time-series data. In: Kanaroglou, P.S., Delmelle, E.M., Paez, A., Edited Volume: Spatial Analysis in Health Geography (Eds.). Ashgate Publishing, pp. 183e196. Ainslie, B., Reuten, C., Steyn, D.G., Le, N.D., Zidek, J.V., 2009. Application of an entropy-based Bayesian optimization technique to the redesign of an existing monitoring network for single air pollutants. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 2715e2729. Arain, M.A., Blair, R., Finkelstein, N., Brook, J., Jerrett, M., 2009. Meteorological influences on the spatial and temporal variability of NO2 in Toronto and Hamilton. Can. Geogr. Geogr. Can. 53, 165 e190. Baalousha, H., 2010. Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: a case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. Agric. Water Manag. 97, 240e246. Brown, G., Carlyle, M., Salmeron, J., Wood, K., 2005. Analyzing the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to attack and planning defenses. Tutor. Oper. Res. Emerg. Theory, Methods, Appl. 102e123. Caselton, W., Zidek, J., 1984. Optimal monitoring network designs. Stat. Probab. Lett. 2, 223e227. Environment Canada, 2015. Canadian Climate Data. Available from: http://climate. weather.gc.ca/. Goldstein, I., Landovitz, L., 1977. Analysis of air pollution patterns in New York CitydI. Can one station represent the large metropolitan area? Atmos. Environ. 11, 47e52. Hiemstra, P.H., Pebesma, E.J., Twenhofel, C.J.W., Heuvelink, G.B.M., 2009. Real-time € automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from the Dutch radioactivity monitoring network. Comput. Geosci. 35, 1711e1721. Kanaroglou, P., Jerrett, M., Morrison, J., Beckerman, B., Arain, M.A., Gilbert, N.L., Brook, J.R., 2005. Establishing an air pollution monitoring network for intraurban population exposure assessment: a location-allocation approach. Atmos. Environ. 39, 2399e2409. Kanaroglou, P.S., Adams, M.D., De Luca, P.F., Corr, D., Sohel, N., 2013. Estimation of sulfur dioxide air pollution concentrations with a spatial autoregressive model. Atmos. Environ. 79, 421e427. Kornelsen, K.C., Coulibaly, P., 2014. Design of an optimum soil moisture monitoring network using SMOS. In: 2014 I