Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Influence of emission rate on atmospheric dispersion modeling of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident

Pages
439–445
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The model-meteorology combination used for emergency response activities had better be the one used to determine the source term.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The role of emission rate in atmospheric dispersion modeling was investigated in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Six different emission rates that were estimated by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency and Norwegian Institute for Air Research after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident were used as inputs to FLEXPART-WRF, a Lagrangian particle dispersion model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The model-meteorology combination used for emergency response activities had better be the one used to determine the source term.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The role of emission rate in atmospheric dispersion modeling was investigated in this study. Six different emission rates that were estimated by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency and Norwegian Institute for Air Research after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident were used as inputs to FLEXPART-WRF, a Lagrangian particle dispersion model. High-resolution (1 km) meteorological data in a local scale region (100 km) were downscaled dynamically by the Weather Research and Forecasting model from a reanalysis of ERA-Interim during 11e31 March, 2011, and were used to drive the model. The accumulated deposition of 137Cs was used to assess the simulations. Deposition occurred mainly during four periods dominated by wet deposition due to precipitation, which were 15, 20e22, 25, and 30e31 March. The basic deposition pattern was established on 15 March, shortly after the highest emission rates of 14 March, and the largest variation in deposition with the different emission rates was also observed in this period. Emission rates estimated are usually not independent from the models and meteorological input data. The model-meteorology combination used for emergency response activities had better be the one used to determine the source term.

🔖

Cite This Article

Geng, X., Xie, Z., ZHANG, L. (2017). Influence of emission rate on atmospheric dispersion modeling of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 439–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/351372

References (6)

  1. Winiarek, V., Bocquet, M., Duhanyan, N., 2014. Estimation of the caesium-137 source term from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant using a consis-tent joint assimilation of air concentration and deposition. Atmos. Environ. 82, 268e279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.017.
  2. Uppala, S.M., Kållberg, P.W., Simmons, A.J., Andrae, U., Bechtold, V.D.C., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J.K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G.A., Li, X., Onogi, K., Saarinen, S., Sokka, N., Allan, R.P., Andersson, E., Arpe, K., Balmaseda, M.A., Beljaars, A.C.M., Berg, L.V.D., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Caires, S., Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Dragosavac, M., Fisher, M., Fuentes, M., Hagemann, S., Holm, E., Hoskins, B.J., Isaksen, L., Janssen, P.A.E.M., Jenne, R., McNally, A.P., Mahfouf, J.-F., Morcrette, J.-J., Rayner, N.A., Saunders, R.W., Simon, P., Sterl, A., Trenberth, K.E., Untch, A., Vasiljevic, D., Viterbo, P., Woollen, J., 2005. The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q. J. R. Meteorological Soc. 131 (612), 2961e3012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.176.
  3. Terada, H., Katata, G., Chino, M., Nagai, H., 2012. Atmospheric discharge and dispersion of radionuclides during the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Part II: verification of the source term. J. Environ. Radioact. 112, 141e154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad. 2012.05.023. Stohl, A., Seibert, P., Wotawa, G., Arnold, D., Burkhart, J.F., Eckhardt, S., Tapia, C., Vargas, A., Yasunari, T.J., 2012. Xenon-133 and Caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12 (5), 2313e2343. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2313-2012.
  4. Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., Wotawa, G., 2005. Technical note: the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5 (9), 2461e2474. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005.
  5. Srinivas, C., Venkatesan, R., 2012. Regional scale atmospheric dispersion simulation of accidental releases of radionuclides from Fukushima Daiichi reactor. Atmos. Environ. 61, 66e84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.082.
  6. Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhi, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., Duda, M., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., Powers, J., 2008. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. Tech. Rep. June, Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5065/D6DZ069T. Saunier,