Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6

Forecasting PM 10 hourly concentrations in northern Italy: Insights on models performance and PM 10 drivers through self-organizing maps

Pages
1204–1213
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Under these conditions, PM 10 accumulation is driven bylocal anthropogenic emissions ascribing to two main sources: heating plants, responsible of emissions of primaryPM 10 (mostly PM 2.5 , likely resulting from wood and biomass burning); and road traffic (basically diesel ve-hicles), mainly responsible of emissions of secondary PM 10 precursors (mostly NO x ), and secondly of primaryPM 10 emissions.The SOM analysis clearly indicated that PM 10 most critical conditions are driven by the secondary ratherprimary PM 10 component.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A linear and an artificial neural network (ANN) statistical model have been developed and validated for short-term forecasting of PM 10 hourly concentrations in the city of Brescia (Italy).
📊
Key Findings & Data:PM 10 observed concentrations werebiased by less than 1% by each model, though the ANN outperformed the linear model, as exhibiting NRMSE of0.48 vs. 0.53, and r 2 of 0.57 vs. 0.48.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Under these conditions, PM 10 accumulation is driven bylocal anthropogenic emissions ascribing to two main sources: heating plants, responsible of emissions of primaryPM 10 (mostly PM 2.5 , likely resulting from wood and biomass burning); and road traffic (basically diesel ve-hicles), mainly responsible of emissions of secondary PM 10 precursors (mostly NO x ), and secondly of primaryPM 10 emissions.The SOM analysis clearly indicated that PM 10 most critical conditions are driven by the secondary ratherprimary PM 10 component.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

A linear and an artificial neural network (ANN) statistical model have been developed and validated for short-term forecasting of PM 10 hourly concentrations in the city of Brescia (Italy). PM 10 observed concentrations werebiased by less than 1% by each model, though the ANN outperformed the linear model, as exhibiting NRMSE of0.48 vs. 0.53, and r 2 of 0.57 vs. 0.48. The self-organizing maps (SOMs) showed that both models predictionsexhibit the same clustering as the observations, with the ANN at worst capable of under-estimating clusteredPM 10 peak concentrations by 5.8 μg/m 3 .In Brescia, PM 10 most critical conditions were detected in wintertime in the early morning or late afternoonunder unfavourable meteorological conditions, i.e. reduced advection enhancing PM 10 stagnation, and lack ofprecipitations capable of reducing PM 10 resuspension. Under these conditions, PM 10 accumulation is driven bylocal anthropogenic emissions ascribing to two main sources: heating plants, responsible of emissions of primaryPM 10 (mostly PM 2.5 , likely resulting from wood and biomass burning); and road traffic (basically diesel ve-hicles), mainly responsible of emissions of secondary PM 10 precursors (mostly NO x ), and secondly of primaryPM 10 emissions.The SOM analysis clearly indicated that PM 10 most critical conditions are driven by the secondary ratherprimary PM 10 component.

🔖

Cite This Article

GUALTİERİ, G., CAROTENUTO, F., FİNARDİ, S., TARTAGLİA, M., TOSCANO, P., GİOLİ, B. (2018). Forecasting PM 10 hourly concentrations in northern Italy: Insights on models performance and PM 10 drivers through self-organizing maps. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6, 1204–1213. https://ajindex.com/articles/351345

References (12)

  1. Abderrahim, H., Chellali, M.R., Hamou, A., 2016. Forecasting PM 10 in Algiers: efficacy of multilayer perceptron networks. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 (2), 1634–1641. ACI, 2017. Data and Statistics. [In Italian]. http://www.aci.it/laci/studi-e-ricerche/dati- e-statistiche.html, Accessed date: 23 February 2018.
  2. Akaike, H., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19 (6), 716–723.
  3. Amato, F., Alastuey, A., Karanasiou, A., Lucarelli, F., Nava, S., Calzolai, G., et al., 2016. AIRUSE-LIFE+: a harmonized PM speciation and source apportionment in five southern European cities. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (5), 3289–3309.
  4. Amodio, M., Andriani, E., De Gennaro, G., Loiotile, A.D., Di Gilio, A., Placentino, M.C., 2012. An integrated approach to identify the origin of PM 10 exceedances. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 19 (8), 3132–3141. ARPA Lombardia, 2014. INEMAR Emission Inventory – 2010 Emissions in the Lombardy Region. [In Italian]. http://www.inemar.eu/xwiki/bin/view/InemarDatiWeb/ Aggiornamenti+dell%27inventario+2010, Accessed date: 23 February 2018.
  5. Barmpadimos, I., Hueglin, C., Keller, J., Henne, S., Prévôt, A.S.H., 2011. Influence of meteorology on PM 10 trends and variability in Switzerland from 1991 to 2008. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1813–1835.
  6. Beck, M.W., 2018. Package ‘NeuralNetTools’, 05/02/2018. https://cran.r-project.org/ web/packages/NeuralNetTools/NeuralNetTools.pdf, Accessed date: 23 February 2018.
  7. Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E., Welsch, R.E., 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. John Wiley & Son, New York 1980.
  8. Biancofiore, F., Busilacchio, M., Verdecchia, M., Tomassetti, B., Aruffo, E., Bianco, S., et al., 2017. Recursive neural network model for analysis and forecast of PM 10 and PM 2.5. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 8, 652–659.
  9. Bowden, G.J., Maier, H.R., Dandy, G.C., 2005. Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1. background and methodology. J. Hydrol. 301, 75–92.
  10. Cai, M., Yin, Y., Xie, M., 2009. Prediction of hourly air pollutant concentrations near urban arterials using artificial neural network approach. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 14 (1), 32–41.
  11. Calcagno, V., de Mazancourt, C., 2010. glmulti: an R package for easy automated model selection with (generalized) linear models. J. Stat. Software 34 (12), 1–29.
  12. Diapouli, E., Manousakas, M.I., Vratolis, S., Vasilatou, V., Pateraki, S., Bairachtari, K.A., et al., 2017. AIRUSE-LIFE+: