Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Is the existing urban greenery enough to cope with current concentrations of PM2.5,PM10and CO2?

Pages
219–233
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended to close internal park roads for cars and/or plant anew green barrier around the park.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Poor air quality in urban areas has a direct impact on the public health on a global scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The examples of airpollution are: particulate matter with particles less than 10μm (PM10) and less than 2.5μm (PM2.5), as well ascarbon dioxide (CO2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended to close internal park roads for cars and/or plant anew green barrier around the park.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Poor air quality in urban areas has a direct impact on the public health on a global scale. The examples of airpollution are: particulate matter with particles less than 10μm (PM10) and less than 2.5μm (PM2.5), as well ascarbon dioxide (CO2). Urban greenery can be a way to clean the air in built-up areas. Many urban parks were,however, created long time ago, and it was not examined whether they are useful for the air purificationnowadays. In year 2017, in the area of the largest city park in Europe–the Silesia Park (S Poland)–a network of40 constant points was created, where from June to October the air quality was measured once a month.Research showed that the air quality was lower near the roads, the microclimate affected the concentration ofpollutants, and trees of different genera and sizes differed in the efficiency of air cleaning. The greater porosity oftree crowns was associated with a higher concentration of all three measured indicators, suggesting theirstagnation between vegetation. Older patches of the park with European hornbeams and beeches deserve pro-tection as the most efficient airfilterers. It is recommended to close internal park roads for cars and/or plant anew green barrier around the park. Current density of trees should be constant or increased to maintain theoptimal microclimate that decreases air temperature determining effective air cleaning.

🔖

Cite This Article

GRZEDİCKA, E. (2019). Is the existing urban greenery enough to cope with current concentrations of PM2.5,PM10and CO2?. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 219–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/351342

References (12)

  1. Abhijith, K.V., Kumar, P., Gallagher, J., McNabola, A., Baldauf, R., Pilla, F., Broderick, B.,Sabatino, S.D., Pulvirenti, B., 2017. Air pollution abatement performances of greeninfrastructure in open road and built-up street canyon environments–a review.Atmos. Environ. 162, 71–86.
  2. Adelasoye, K.A., Alamu, L.O., 2016. Accumulation of heavy metal pollutants in soil andvegetation and their effects on soil microbial population on roadsides in Ogbomosho,Nigeria. J. Environ. Sci. Water Res. 5 (1), 001–007.Al-Dabbous, A.N., Kumar, P., 2014. The influence of roadside vegetation barriers onairborne nanoparticles and pedestrians exposure under varying wind conditions.Atmos. Environ. 90, 113–124.
  3. Baldauf, R., 2017. Roadside vegetation design characteristics that can improve local,near-road air quality. Transport. Res. D. 52, 354–361.
  4. Baldauf, R., Thoma, E., Khlystov, A., Isakov, V., Bowker, G., Long, T., Snow, R., 2008.Impacts of noise barriers on near-road air quality. Atmos. Environ. 42 (32),7502–7507.
  5. Barnes, M., Brade, T.K., Mackenzie, A.R., Whyatt, J., Carruthers, D., Stocker, J., Cai, X.,Hewitt, C., 2014. Spatially-varying surface roughness and ground-level air quality inan operational dispersion model. Environ. Pollut. 185, 44–51.
  6. Beckett, K.P., Freer–Smith, P.H., Taylor, G., 1998. Urban woodlands: their role in redu-cing the effects of particulate pollution. Environ. Pollut. 99, 347–360.
  7. Bell, M.L., Morgenstern, R.D., Harrington, W., 2011. Quantifying the human healthbenefits of air pollution policies: review of recent studies and new directions in ac-countability research. Environ. Sci. Pol. 14, 357–368.
  8. Cardelino, C.A., Chameides, W.L., 1990. Natural hydrocarbons, urbanization, and urbanozone. J. Geophys. Res. 95 (D9), 13971–13979.
  9. Caricchia, A.M., Chiavarini, S., Pezza, M., 1999. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in theurban atmospheric particulate matter in the city of Naples (Italy). Atmos. Environ.33, 3731–3738.
  10. Chameides, W.L., Lindsay, R.W., Richardson, J., Kiang, C.S., 1988. The role of biogenichydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. Science 241,1473–1475.
  11. Chen, L., Liu, C., Zou, R., Yang, M., Zhang, Z., 2016. Experimental examination of ef-fectiveness of vegetation as bio-filter of particulate matters in the urban environment.Environ. Pollut. 208, 198–208.
  12. Chen, L., Liu, C., Zhang, L., Zou, R., Zhang, Z., 2017. Variation in tree species ability tocapture and retain airbornefine particulate matter (PM 2.5). Sci. Rep. 7, 3206.