Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 11

Particulate matter concentrations and emissions of a fattening pig facility in northern China

Pages
1902–1911
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that daily meanindoor TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were 0.34–4.96, 0.15 to 1.01, and 0.06–0.20 mg·m−³.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Particulate matter (PM) from pig farms are pollutants affecting human health and the environmental.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A one-year study to monitor the dynamics of total suspendedparticles (TSP), particulate matter with diameter less than 10 μm (PM10) and 2.5 μm (PM2.5) was conducted inthree pig fattening facilities of a commercial pig farm in Beijing, China.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that daily meanindoor TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were 0.34–4.96, 0.15 to 1.01, and 0.06–0.20 mg·m−³.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Particulate matter (PM) from pig farms are pollutants affecting human health and the environmental. The information on this topic is limited in China to date. A one-year study to monitor the dynamics of total suspendedparticles (TSP), particulate matter with diameter less than 10 μm (PM10) and 2.5 μm (PM2.5) was conducted inthree pig fattening facilities of a commercial pig farm in Beijing, China. The results showed that daily meanindoor TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were 0.34–4.96, 0.15 to 1.01, and 0.06–0.20 mg·m−³. The averageemission rate (ER) of PM per animal (pig) and livestock unit (LU = 500 kg) was 1.06 ± 0.65 g d−1pig−1(11.83 ± 7.07 g d−1LU−1) for TSP, 0.50 ± 0.39 g d−1pig−1(5.53 ± 4.10 g d−1LU−1) for PM10, and0.12 ± 0.17 g d−1pig−1(1.42 ± 1.86 g d−1LU−1) for PM2.5, respectively. The daily maximum concentrations of TSP and PM10 exceeded the Chinese environmental quality standard for the livestock and poultryfarm (NY/T388-1999). The concentration of PM2.5 in animal house and emissions of PM form animal productionhave not been regulated in China, it is necessary to focus on mitigation measures to minimize the impacts of PM.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHANG, B., LIU, Y., DONG, H., TAO, X., YAO, H. (2020). Particulate matter concentrations and emissions of a fattening pig facility in northern China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 11, 1902–1911. https://ajindex.com/articles/351318

References (10)

  1. Albert, W., Julio, M., Peter, W.G., Groot, K., Nico, W.M.O., André, J.A.A., 2015. Emissions of particulate matter from animal houses in The Netherlands. Atmos. Environ. 111, 202–212.
  2. Anderson, C.I., Von Essen, S.G., Smith, L.M., Spencer, J., Jolie, R., Donham, K.J., 2004. Respiratory symptoms and airway obstruction in swine veterinarians:a persistent problem. Am. J. Ind. Med. 46 (4), 386–392.
  3. Bakutis, B., Monstviliene, E., Januskeviciene, G., 2004. Analyses of airborne contamination with bacteria, endotoxins and dust in livestock barns and poultry houses. Acta Vet. 73 (2), 283–289.
  4. Bharti, S.K., Kumar, D., Anand, S., Poonam Barman, S.C., Kumar, N., 2017a. Temporal variation and trace metal characterization of particulate matter in ambient air of rural and urban areas of lucknow, India. Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability 5 (1), 75–82.
  5. Bharti, S.K., Kumar, D., Anand, S., Poonam Barman, S.C., Kumar, N., 2017b. Characterization and morphological analysis of individual aerosol of PM10 in urban area of Lucknow. India. Micron 103, 90–98.
  6. Brand, P., Havlicek, P., Steiners, M., Holzinger, K., Reisgen, U., Kraus, T., 2013. Exposure of healthy subjects with emissions from a gas metal arc welding process: part 1—exposure technique and external exposure. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 86 (1), 25–30.
  7. Cambra-Lopez, M., Aarnink, A.J.A., Zhao, Y., Calvet, S., Torres, A.G., 2010. Airborne particulate matter from livestock production systems: a review of an air pollution problem. Environ. Pollut. 158 (1), 1–17. Cambra-López, M., Torres, A.G., Aarnink, A.J.A., Ogink, N.W.M., 2011. Source analysis of fine and coarse particulate matter from livestock houses. Atmos. Environ. 45 (3), 694–707.
  8. Casey, K.D., Wheeler, E.F., Gates, R.S., Xin, X., Topper, P.A., Liang, Y., Heber, A.J., Jacobson, L.D., 2002. Quality assured measurements of livestock building emissions: Part 4 Building ventilation rate. In: Proc. Symp. Air Quality Measurement Methods and Technology, San Francisco, CA. (CD-ROM). Costa, A., Guarino, M., 2009. Definition of yearly emission factor of dust and greenhouse gases through continuous measurements in swine husbandry. Atmos. Environ. 43, 1548–1556.
  9. Dai, C.H., Huang, S.J., Zhou, Y.Y., Xu, B., Peng, H., Qin, P.F., Wu, G.Y., 2019. Concentrations and emissions of particulate matter and ammonia from extensive livestock farm in South China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 1871–1879.
  10. Dvonch, J.T., Marsik, F.J., Keeler, G.J., Robins, T.G., Morishita, M., 2000.