Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Characterisation of ambient Total Gaseous Mercury concentrations over theSouth African Highveld

Pages
12–23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An interesting phenomena, however,was observed at ST where the diurnal cycle suggests a potential significant influence from local domesticcombustion sources

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mercury is considered a ubiquitous, toxic, and global pollutant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this pilot study, concentrations ofTGM and criteria pollutants (O3,SO2, NO, NO2, and CO) were measured concurrently with meteorologicalparameters at Balfour (BF), Middelburg (MB), and Standerton (ST) from January 2009 to December 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An interesting phenomena, however,was observed at ST where the diurnal cycle suggests a potential significant influence from local domesticcombustion sources
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Mercury is considered a ubiquitous, toxic, and global pollutant. In this study, ambient Total Gaseous Mercury(TGM) concentrations over the South African Highveld are characterised. Studies on ambient mercury in thisregion is important because of various anthropogenic emission sources. In this pilot study, concentrations ofTGM and criteria pollutants (O3,SO2, NO, NO2, and CO) were measured concurrently with meteorologicalparameters at Balfour (BF), Middelburg (MB), and Standerton (ST) from January 2009 to December 2009. Thespatial variation of TGM concentrations ranged from 0.40 to 28.72 ng/m3(1.99 0.94 ng/m3), 0.12–9.91 ng/m3(1.04 0.62 ng/m3), and 0.21–32.10 ng/m3(1.25 1.38 ng/m3), at BF, MB, and ST, respectively. Generally, con-centrations fell within the Northern Hemisphere background range of 1.5–1.7 ng/m3and Cape Point, SouthAfrica background of 1.2–1.4 ng/m3, with the exception of outliers. The outliers were much higher than thebackground values and may be the result of pollution events. Seasonal variation varied with descending orders ofsummer, spring, winter, autumn, at BF; summer, winter, autumn, spring at MB; and winter, spring, summer at ST(no data available for autumn). This study observed no profound diurnal patterns at BF and MB where sparselocal and regional sources appear to have been the predominant sources. An interesting phenomena, however,was observed at ST where the diurnal cycle suggests a potential significant influence from local domesticcombustion sources

🔖

Cite This Article

BELELİE, M., PİKETH, S., BURGER, R., VENTER, A., NAİDOO, M. (2019). Characterisation of ambient Total Gaseous Mercury concentrations over theSouth African Highveld. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 12–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/351305

References (11)

  1. Angot, H., Barret, M., Magand, O., Ramonet, M., Dommergue, A., 2014. A 2-year record ofatmospheric mercury species at a background Southern Hemisphere station onAmsterdam Island. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 11461–11473.https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014.
  2. Ariya, P.A., Dastoor, A.P., Amyot, M., Schroeder, W.H., Barrie, L., Anlauf, K., Raofie, F.,Ryzhkov, A., Davignon, D., Lalonde, J., Ste en, A., 2004. The Arctic: a sink formercury. Tellus Ser. B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 56, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00118.
  3. Auzmendi-Murua, I., Castillo, A., Bozzelli, J.W., 2014. Mercury oxidation via chlorine,bromine, and iodine under atmospheric conditions: thermo-chemistry and kinetics. J.Phys. Chem. A 118, 2959–2975.https://doi.org/10.1021/jp412654s.
  4. Baker, P.G.L., Brunke, E., Slemr, F., Crouch, A.M., 2002. Atmospheric mercury mea-surements at Cape point. S. Afr. 36, 2459–2465.
  5. Balashov, N.V., Thompson, A.M., Piketh, S.J., Langerman, K.E., 2014. Surface ozonevariability and trends over the south African Highveld from 1990 to 2007. J.Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 4323–4342.https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022848.
  6. Berg, T., Sekkester, S., Steinnes, E., Valdal, A.K., Wibetoe, G., 2003. Springtime depletionof mercury in the European Arctic as observed at Svalbard. Sci. Total Environ. 304,43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00555-7.
  7. Bergan, T., Rodhe, H., 2001. Oxidation of elemental mercury in the atmosphere; con-straints imposed by global scale modelling. J. Atmos. Chem. 40, 191–212.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011929927896.
  8. Bredenkamp, L., 2017. Background Ambient Atmospheric Mercury Concentrations for theSouth African interior. North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus.Brunke, E.G., Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H.H., Labuschagne, C., Slemr, F., 2012. Emissions ofmercury in southern Africa derived from long-term observations at Cape Point, SouthAfrica. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 7465–7474.https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7465-2012.
  9. Brunke, E.G., Labuschagne, C., Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H.H., Slemr, F., 2010. Gaseous ele-mental mercury depletion events observed at Cape Point during 2007-2008. Atmos.Chem. Phys. Discuss. 9, 20979–21009.https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-9-20979-2009.
  10. Brunke, E.G., Labuschagne, C., Slemr, F., 2001. Gaseous mercury emissions from afire inthe Cape Peninsula, South Africa, during January 2000. 28, 1483–1486.
  11. Carpi, A., 1997. Mercury from combustion sources: a review of the chemical speciesemitted and their transport in the atmosphere. Water Air