Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Modeling urban background air pollution in Quito, Ecuador

Pages
646–666
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that theUBM model successfully predicts concentrations of CO, NO2, NOx, O3 and PM2.5 while the predicted SO2 concentrations are unsatisfactory.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study estimates air pollution at urban background level for Quito, Ecuador, using the Urban Background Model(UBM) developed at Aarhus University, Denmark.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hourly concentrations of CO, NO2, NOx, O3, PM2.5 and SO2 werecalculated for the year 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that theUBM model successfully predicts concentrations of CO, NO2, NOx, O3 and PM2.5 while the predicted SO2 concentrations are unsatisfactory.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study estimates air pollution at urban background level for Quito, Ecuador, using the Urban Background Model(UBM) developed at Aarhus University, Denmark. Hourly concentrations of CO, NO2, NOx, O3, PM2.5 and SO2 werecalculated for the year 2009. UBM performance is evaluated at six monitoring locations. The air pollution emissioninventory was scaled, using calibration factors, until modeled concentrations were in line with observations.Predicted values were graphically and statistically evaluated by comparison to measurements. The statistical assessment is conducted for: Fraction of predictions within a factor of two of the observations (FAC2), Fractional meanbias (FB), Normalized mean-square error (NMSE) and Normalized absolute difference (NAD). Results show that theUBM model successfully predicts concentrations of CO, NO2, NOx, O3 and PM2.5 while the predicted SO2 concentrations are unsatisfactory. PM2.5 modeling meets the criteria of acceptance, but their results depend largely onthe regional levels, so the quality of this information is extremely relevant. The UBM model was applied for the years2008 and 2010 using meteorological data retrieved from the modeling sites with emissions and calibration factorsderived for the year 2009, showing a performance similar to that of 2009. The findings confirm the applicability ofUBM to predict air pollution at the urban background level in Quito. Satisfactory results are obtained by applyingmeteorological data derived from any of the available monitoring stations. The unsatisfactory results for SO2 suggestthat emission data should be reviewed and that this cannot be obtained simply by scaling.

🔖

Cite This Article

VALENCIA, V. H., HERTEL, O., KETZEL, M., LEVIN, G. (2020). Modeling urban background air pollution in Quito, Ecuador. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 646–666. https://ajindex.com/articles/351300

References (8)

  1. Amorim, J.H., Rodrigues, V., Tavares, R., Valente, J., Borrego, C., 2013. CFD modelling of the aerodynamic effect of trees on urban air pollution dispersion. Sci. Total Environ. 461–462, 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2013.05.031.
  2. Baca, J.C., 2014. Inventario de Emisiones de Contaminantes Criterio, DMQ 2011.
  3. Quito. Baca, J.C., Alemán, P., Díaz, V., 2010. Inventario de emisiones atmosféricas del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito 2009.
  4. Quito. Berkowicz, R., 2000. A simple model for urban background pollution. Environ. Monit. Assess. 65, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006466025186.
  5. Berkowicz, R., Olesen, H.R., Jensen, S.S., 2003. User's Guide to WinOSPM. NERI Technical Report. Roskilde. Cazorla, M., 2016. Air quality over a populated Andean region: insights from measurements of ozone, NO, and boundary layer depths. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 7, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APR.2015.07.006. Radian Corporation, 1996. Evaluating the Uncertainty of Emission Estimates. North Carolina. Dias, H.L.F., 2018. Methodology for Air Pollution Impact Assessment of Low Emission Zones in Urban Areas of Brazil - the Case Study of Fortaleza. Universidade Federal do Ceará. Días, V., 2019. Ozone Concentrations. Unpublished data. Díaz, V., 2018. Informe de la Calidad del Aire de Quito 2017. Quito. ECMWF, n.d. ECMWF | CAMS Reanalysis [WWW Document]. URL https://apps.ecmwf. int/data-catalogues/cams-reanalysis/?stream=oper&expver=eac4&month=feb& year=2007&type=an&class=mc (accessed 12.5.2018).
  6. Ehnberg, J.S.G., Bollen, M.H.J., 2005. Simulation of global solar radiation based on cloud observations. Sol. Energy 78, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.08. 016. Exponent, 2019. Official CALPUFF modeling system. [WWW Document]. URL. http:// www.src.com/, Accessed date: 4 October 2019.
  7. Fu, X., Liu, J., Ban-Weiss, G.A., Zhang, J., Huang, X., Ouyang, B., Popoola, O., Tao, S., 2017. Effects of canyon geometry on the distribution of traffic-related air pollution in a large urban area: implications of a multi-canyon air pollution dispersion model. Atmos. Environ. 165, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2017.06.031.
  8. Gallardo, L., Escribano, J., Dawidowski, L., Rojas, N., de Fátima Andrade, M., Osses, M., 2012. Evaluation of vehicle emission inventories for carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides for Bogotá, Buenos Aires, Santiago, and São Paulo. Atmos. Environ. 47, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.051. Gerencia de Planificación de la Movilidad, 2009.