Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

The influence of a viaduct on PM dispersion in a typical street: Field experiment and numerical simulations

Pages
815–824
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We concluded that a viaduct increasesthe concentration of particulate matter in the street canyons and greatly affects the airflow field.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To investigate the effects of a viaduct on particle diffusion below the viaduct, field measurements for particulatematter (PM) concentration along roadsides with and without viaducts were conducted in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Air flow andparticle (PM2.5) distribution around a viaduct were simulated by Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) equippedwith the Discrete Phase Model in a Lagrange coordinate system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We concluded that a viaduct increasesthe concentration of particulate matter in the street canyons and greatly affects the airflow field.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

To investigate the effects of a viaduct on particle diffusion below the viaduct, field measurements for particulatematter (PM) concentration along roadsides with and without viaducts were conducted in this study. Air flow andparticle (PM2.5) distribution around a viaduct were simulated by Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) equippedwith the Discrete Phase Model in a Lagrange coordinate system. Experimental results of this case study indicatethat the average mass concentrations of PM10 (156.7 μg m−3), PM2.5 (77.3 μg m−3) and PM1 (56.5 μg m−3) onan elevated highway exceeded those on the ground–level expressway by 15%, 10% and 12%, respectively.Simulation found that two main vortices as well as two or three secondary vortices are generated in the canyonwhen both a viaduct and a barrier are added, while there was only one main vortex in the street canyon withouta viaduct. A viaduct causes the particulate matter to be distributed unevenly, and the concentration on theleeward side near the ground is the highest. The vortex center is elevated as the value of ΔT (ground–level airtemperature) increases, but the concentrations are basically maintained. We concluded that a viaduct increasesthe concentration of particulate matter in the street canyons and greatly affects the airflow field. Both ΔT and asound barrier on a viaduct reduce the PM concentrations, but the effects are limited.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHI, H., Qiu, Z., WANG, W., WANG, G., Hao, Y., LIU, Y. (2020). The influence of a viaduct on PM dispersion in a typical street: Field experiment and numerical simulations. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 815–824. https://ajindex.com/articles/351259

References (13)

  1. Alderete, T.L., Chen, Z., Toledo-Corral, C.M., Contreras, Z.A., Kim, J.S., Habre, R., Chatzi, L., Bastain, T., Breton, C.V., Gilliland, F.D., 2018. Ambient and traffic-related air pollution exposures as novel risk factors for metabolic dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Current Epidemiol. Rep. 5 (2), 79–91.
  2. Allegrini, J., Dorer, V., Carmeliet, J., 2014. Buoyant flows in street canyons: validation of CFD simulations with wind tunnel measurements. Build. Environ. 72, 63–74.
  3. Bellutti, P., Lui, A., 1994. Insight into gate oxide thinning. J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 (3), 750–754.
  4. Chan, T.L., Dong, G., Leung, C.W., Cheung, C.S., Hung, W.T., 2002. Validation of a twodimensional pollutant dispersion model in an isolated street canyon. Atmos. Environ. 36 (5), 861–872.
  5. Chen, H., Su, X., Li, J., Zhong, X., 2019. Effects of gasoline and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers blending in diesel on the combustion and emission of a common rail diesel engine. Energy 171, 981–999.
  6. Cheng, Y., Lee, S.C., Ho, K.F., Louie, P.K.K., 2006. On-road particulate matter (PM2.5) and gaseous emissions in the Shing Mun Tunnel, Hong Kong. Atmos. Environ. 40 (23), 4235–4245.
  7. Fluent, V.6.3, 2006. User's Manual. http://fluent.com.
  8. Garmory, A., Kim, I.S., Britter, R.E., Mastorakos, E., 2009. Simulations of the dispersion of reactive pollutants in a street canyon, considering different chemical mechanisms and micromixing. Atmos. Environ. 43 (31), 4670–4680.
  9. Hagler, G.S.W., Thoma, E.D., Baldauf, R.W., 2010. High-resolution mobile monitoring of carbon monoxide and ultrafine particle concentrations in a near-road environment. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 60 (3), 328–336.
  10. Hang, J., Lin, M., Wong, D.C., Wang, X., Wang, B., Buccolieri, R., 2016. On the influence of viaduct and ground heating on pollutant dispersion in 2D street canyons and toward single-sided ventilated buildings. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 7 (5), 817–832.
  11. Hang, J., Luo, Z., Wang, X., He, L., Wang, B., Zhu, W., 2017. The influence of street layouts and viaduct settings on daily carbon monoxide exposure and intake fraction in idealized urban canyons. Environ. Pollut. 220, 72–86
  12. Part A. Hang, J., Xian, Z., Wang, D., Mak, C.M., Wang, B., Fan, Y., 2018. The impacts of viaduct settings and street aspect ratios on personal intake fraction in three-dimensional urban-like geometries. Build. Environ. 143, 138–162.
  13. He, L., Hang, J., Wang, X., Lin, B., Li, X., Lan, G., 2017. Numerical investigations of flow and passive pollutant exposure in high-rise deep street