Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 12

Determination of PM10 and deposited dust dispersion on the settlementareas from Aksa Göynük coal (lignite) fueled thermal power plant

Pages
2126–2132
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite the providingcurrent limit values of the dust parameter for power plant where the electrostatic precipitator (ESP)filter andflue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems are applied, it is observed that the dust emissions from activities such ascoal extraction, crushing, sieving and ash storage in the area show different cases depending on meteorologicalconditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the growing population and rapidly developing industrialization in Turkey, energy demand is also in-creasing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The majority of the energy is produced using imported products, which increase the current accountdeficit in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite the providingcurrent limit values of the dust parameter for power plant where the electrostatic precipitator (ESP)filter andflue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems are applied, it is observed that the dust emissions from activities such ascoal extraction, crushing, sieving and ash storage in the area show different cases depending on meteorologicalconditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

With the growing population and rapidly developing industrialization in Turkey, energy demand is also in-creasing. The majority of the energy is produced using imported products, which increase the current accountdeficit in Turkey. The use of coal from domestic sources are encouraged for economic reasons. One of the coal(lignite) fueled thermal power plants established for this purpose is operating in the province of Bolu Göynük. Inorder to determine the environmental effect of the plant on the settlement areas in the area, air quality mon-itoring studies have been conducted. In the study, the periodic PM10and deposited dust parameters have beenmonitored monthly at four points between 2013 and 2019, including before and after installation of the plant. Asa result of the study; the mean PM10measurement were obtained as 36.48 ± 0.73; 37.61 ± 0.75;42.70 ± 0.85 and 38.72 ± 0.77μg/m3for four points. Meanwhile, the mean values of the deposited dust werefound as 70.81 ± 2.12; 35.55 ± 1.07; 79.50 ± 2.39 and 29.38 ± 0.88 mg/m2/day. Despite the providingcurrent limit values of the dust parameter for power plant where the electrostatic precipitator (ESP)filter andflue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems are applied, it is observed that the dust emissions from activities such ascoal extraction, crushing, sieving and ash storage in the area show different cases depending on meteorologicalconditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERCAN, Ö., DİNÇER, F., SARI, D., ÖZCAN, C., DİNÇER, F. K. (2020). Determination of PM10 and deposited dust dispersion on the settlementareas from Aksa Göynük coal (lignite) fueled thermal power plant. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 12, 2126–2132. https://ajindex.com/articles/351240

References (6)

  1. Air Quality Assessment and Management Regulation (Aqamr), 2008. Ministry of environment and urbanisation. Official Journal Republic of Turkey 26898. Buonanno, G., Dell'Isola, M., Stabile, L., Viola, A., 2011. Critical aspects of the uncertainty budget in the gravimetric PM measurements. Measurement 44 (1), 139–147. Electricity Generation Company (EUAS), 2016. Electricity Generation Sector Report 2016. 35 pp., Ankara. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2014. Reference News release: US Settlement with Michigan Utility to reduce emissions at its coal-fired power plants, fund projects to benefit Environment and communities. https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/ reference-news-release-us-settlement-michigan-utility-reduce-emissions-its-coalfired, Accessed date: September 2014.
  2. Hassan, H., Latif, M.T., Juneng, L., Amil, N., Khan, M.F., Yik, D.J., Abdullah, N.A., 2020. Interaction of PM10 concentrations with local and synoptic meteorological conditions at different temporal scales. Atmos. Res. 241. Khoshsima, M., Ahmadi-Givi, F., Bidokhti, A.A., Sabetghadam, S., 2014. Impact of meteorological parameters on relation between aerosol optical indices and air pollution in a sub-urban area. J. Aerosol Sci. 68, 46–57.
  3. Kim, H.C., Kim, E., Bae, C., Cho, J.H., Kim, B-Uk, Kim, S., 2017. Regional contributions to particulate matter concentration in the Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea: seasonal variation and sensitivity to meteorology and emissions inventory. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 10315–10332.
  4. Lou, C., Liu, H., Li, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, J., Dai, L., 2017. Relationships of relative humidity with PM2.5 and PM10 in the yangtze river delta, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 189. Lu, P., Wu, J., Pan, W., 2010. Particulate matter emissions from a coal-fired power plant. In: 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Chengdu, pp. 1–4. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (MENR), 2014. Strategic Plan 2015-2019. 128 pp., Ankara.
  5. Mues, A., Manders, A., Schaap, M., Kerschbaumer, A., Stern, R., Builtjes, P., 2012. Impact of the extreme meteorological conditions during the summer 2003 in Europe on particulate matter concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 55, 377–391.
  6. Olszowski, T., 2016. Changes in PM10 concentration due to large-scale rainfall. Arab. J. Geosci. 9. Power Generation Technologies (PGT), Coal-fired power plants, 2014. (Chapter 3), 29–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-098330-1.00003-X. Regulation of Industrial Air Pollution Control (RIAPC), 20