Journals / Avrasya Etüdleri / 2021 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 59

A LEGITIMACY QUESTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE KOSOVO NON-RECOGNITION QUAGMIRE

Pages
81–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes that the fact that Kosovo was not recognised by all European Union countries indicates that unity of action has not been established within the Union, which could jeopardize Kosovo’s possible accession process, and recommends that the European Union should play a more active role in Kosovo’s recognition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Kosovo, the latest breakaway territory in the Balkan region, declared its independence from Serbia on February 17, 2008 despite the international community’s split over this decision.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The European Union noted Kosovo's declaration of independence on 18 February and allowed the member states to decide whether to recognise Kosovo.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes that the fact that Kosovo was not recognised by all European Union countries indicates that unity of action has not been established within the Union, which could jeopardize Kosovo’s possible accession process, and recommends that the European Union should play a more active role in Kosovo’s recognition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kosovo · European Union · EULEX

Abstract

Kosovo, the latest breakaway territory in the Balkan region, declared its independence from Serbia on February 17, 2008 despite the international community’s split over this decision. The European Union noted Kosovo's declaration of independence on 18 February and allowed the member states to decide whether to recognise Kosovo. However, there is intransigence among European Union countries in that five member states – Cyprus (the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus), Greece, Romania, Slovakia, and Spain – refused to recognise Kosovo's independence for various reasons. Due to this quagmire in the European Union, Kosovo is far away from its membership perspective. This situation has prevented Kosovo from having positive relations with the European Union and has been endangering the possibility of accession. In this study, the role of the European Union in the process leading to the independence of Kosovo and in the post-independence period is discussed, and the main arguments of the European Union countries that do not recognize Kosovo after the declaration of independence are discussed. The first part of the study sheds light on the role of the European Union in the process of Kosovo's independence. In the second part, Kosovo-European Union relations after 2008, and in the last part, the reasons of these five Union countries not recognizing Kosovo are discussed. The article concludes that the fact that Kosovo was not recognised by all European Union countries indicates that unity of action has not been established within the Union, which could jeopardize Kosovo’s possible accession process, and recommends that the European Union should play a more active role in Kosovo’s recognition.

Özet

Kosovo, the latest breakaway territory in the Balkan region, declared its independence from Serbia on February 17, 2008 despite the international community’s split over this decision. The European Union noted Kosovo's declaration of independence on 18 February and allowed the member states to decide whether to recognise Kosovo. However, there is intransigence among European Union countries in that five member states – Cyprus (the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus), Greece, Romania, Slovakia, and Spain –refused to recognise Kosovo's independence for various reasons. Due to this quagmire in the European Union, Kosovo is far away from its membership perspective. This situation has prevented Kosovo from having positive relations with the European Union and has been endangering the possibility of accession. In this study, the role of the European Union in the process leading to the independence of Kosovo and in the post-independence period is discussed, and the main arguments of the European Union countries that do not recognize Kosovo after the declaration of independence are discussed. The first part of the study sheds light on the role of the European Union in the process of Kosovo's independence. In the second part, Kosovo-European Union relations after 2008, and in the last part, the reasons of these five Union countries not recognizing Kosovo are discussed. The article concludes that the fact that Kosovo was not recognised by all European Union countries indicates that unity of action has not been established within the Union, which could jeopardize Kosovo’s possible accession process, and recommends that the European Union should play a more active role in Kosovo’s recognition.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNER, O. (2021). A LEGITIMACY QUESTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE KOSOVO NON-RECOGNITION QUAGMIRE. Avrasya Etüdleri, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 59, 81–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/351180

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ağır, Bülent Sarper, Murat Necip Arman and Ekrem Yaşar Akçay. “The Peace-Building Efforts of the European Union in the Western Balkans: The Case of Macedonia and Kosovo”, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21:2, (2019), pp. 517-531.
  2. Armakolas, Ioannis. “Greece: Kosovo’s Most Engaged Non-Recogniser”, ed. James Ker-Lindsay and Ioannis Armakolas, The Politics of Recognition and Engagement: EU Member States Relations with Kosovo, Cham (Switzerland), Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, pp.123-146.
  3. Baliqi, Bekim. “Contested War Remembrance and Ethnopolitical Identities in Kosovo”, The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 46:3, (2018), pp.471-483. BBC News, 02.09.2014, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11283616, Accessed 15.05.2020.
  4. Beha, Adem and Arben Hajrullahu. “Soft Competitive Authoritarianism and Negative Stability in Kosovo: Statebuilding from UNMIK to EULEX and Beyond”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20:1, (2020), pp. 103-122.
  5. Bieber, Florian. “The Serbia-Kosovo Agreements: An EU Success Story”, Review of Central and East European Law, 40, 2015, pp. 285-319.
  6. Britannica. “Montevideo Convention”, https://www.britannica.com/event/Montevideo-Convention, Accessed 10.10.2020.
  7. Chandler, David. “Kosovo: Statebuilding Utopia and Reality”, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 13:5, (2019), pp.545-555.
  8. Coll, Alberto R. “Kosovo and the Moral Burdens of Power”, ed. Andrew J. Bacevich and Eliot A. Cohen, War Over Kosovo, New York, Columbia University Press, 2001, pp.124-154. Council of the European Union. Council Conclusions on Kosovo, 2851st External Relations Council Meeting, Brussels, 18.02.2008. Council of the European Union. General Affairs and External Relations, Press Release, 6496/08, Brussels, 18.02.2008.
  9. Daalder, Ivo H. “The United States, Europe, and the Balkans”, Problems of Post-Communism, 49:1, (2002), pp.3-11.
  10. Damian, Alexandru. The Kosovo Question in Romanian Politics, 11.06.2019, https://blog.politics.ox.ac.uk/the-kosovo-question-in-romanian-politics/ Accessed 19.01.2021
  11. Dijkstra, Hylke. “The Planning and Implementation of the Rule of Law Mission of the European Union in Kosovo”, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 5:2, (2011), pp.193-210.
  12. Duke, Simon, Hans-Georg Ehrhart and Karadi, Matthias. “The Major European Allies: France, Germany, and the United Kingdom”, ed. Albrecht Schnabel and Ramesh Thakur, Kosovo and the Challenge of Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation, Collective Action, and International Citizenship, New