Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Balance Test Outcomes in Children with Poor Vision

Pages
284–288
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Any discrepancies in any one of these systems may negatively influence the overall balance and postural stability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMSBalance is constituted through the integration of vestibular, proprioceptive, and visual and motor neurophysiology systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mean age of the children in the study group (n=20) was 7.35±1.92 years, while that of the children in the control group with healthy vision was 8.2±1.10 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Any discrepancies in any one of these systems may negatively influence the overall balance and postural stability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMSBalance is constituted through the integration of vestibular, proprioceptive, and visual and motor neurophysiology systems. Any discrepancies in any one of these systems may negatively influence the overall balance and postural stability. This study aimed to evaluate balance in children with poor vision.MATERIAL and METHODSThe subjects of the present study were children with poor vision. The mean age of the children in the study group (n=20) was 7.35±1.92 years, while that of the children in the control group with healthy vision was 8.2±1.10 years. All subjects were assessed with the Functional Reach Test, Romberg Test, Single Leg Stance Test (eyes open and closed), Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBBS), Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB), and The Timed Up & Go (TUG) Test.RESULTSThe results showed that children with poor vision performed relatively poorer than healthy children in the Functional Reach Test, Romberg Test, Single Leg Stance Test (eyes open and closed), PBBS, mCSTIB, and TUG tests (p=0.00). We noted that children with poor vision had to strain more to preserve their postural stability in the Single Leg Stance Tests and the mCSTIB Test with closed eyes relative to that with opened eyes (p=0.00).CONCLUSIONOur findings indicate that children with poor vision have weaker balance relative to their healthy peers. Thus, inadequate level of visual input negatively influences the body balance in children.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAS, B., KARABULUT, M., MÜJDECİ, B. (2020). Evaluation of Balance Test Outcomes in Children with Poor Vision. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 284–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/351073

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. McLeod B, Hansen E. Effects of the Eyerobics Visual Skills Training Program on Static Balance Performance of Male and Female Subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1989
  2. 69(3_suppl): 1123-6. [Crossref] 2. Hsu WL, Scholz JP, Scho’ner G, Jeka JJ, Kiemel T. Control and estimation of posture during quite stance depends on multijoint coordination. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007
  3. 97(4): 3024-35. [Crossref] 3. Giagazoglou P, Amiridis IG, Zafeirids A, Thimara M, Kouvelioti V, Kellis E. Static balance control and lower limb strength in blind and sighted women. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2009
  4. 107(5): 571-9. [Crossref] 4. Choy NL, Brauer S, Nitz J. Changes in postural stability in women aged 20 to 80 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003
  5. 58(6): 525- 30. [Crossref] 5. Schmid M, Nardone A, De Nunzio AM, Schmid M, Scleppati M. Equilibruim during static and dynamic tasks in blind subjects: no evidence of cross-modal plasticity. Brain 2007
  6. 130(Pt 8): 2097-107. [Crossref] 6. Atasavun Uysal S, Düger T. A comparison of motor skills in Turkish children with different visual acuity. Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 2011
  7. 22(1): 23-9. 7. Tomomitsu MS, Alonso AC, Morimoto E, Bobbio TG, Greve JM. Static and Dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults. Clinics 2013
  8. 68(4): 517-21. [Crossref] 8. Schieppati M, Tacchini E, Nardone A, Tarantola J, Corna S. Subjective perception of body sway. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999
  9. 66(3): 313-22. [Crossref] 9. Friedrich M, Grein HJ, Wicher C, Schuetze J, Mueller A, Lauenroth A, et al. Influence of pathologic and simulated visual dysfunctions on the postural system. Exp Brain Res 2008
  10. 186(2): 305-14. [Crossref] 10. Ray Ct, Horvat M, Croce R, Mason RC, Wolf SL. The impact of vision loss on pustural stability and balance strategies in individuals with profound vision loss. Gait Posture 2008
  11. 28(1): 58-61. [Crossref] 11. Loughran S, Tennant N, Kishore A, Swan IR. Interobserver reliability in evaluating postural stability between clinicians and posturography. Clin Otolaryngol 2005
  12. 30(3): 255-7. [Crossref] 12. Lin Y, Chen T, Tang Y, Wang C. A Reliability study for standing functional reach test using modified and traditional rulers. Percept Mot Skills 2012
  13. 115(2): 512-20. [Crossref] 13. Balaban Ö, Nacır B, Erdem HR, Karagöz A. Denge fonksiyonunun değerlendirilmesi. J Phys Med Rehabil Sci 2009
  14. Black FO. Normal subject postural sway during the Romberg test. American journal of Otol