Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5

Patient doses from CT examinations in Turkey

Pages
428–434
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings from this study are recommended for use as national DRLs in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEWe aimed to establish the first diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography (CT) examinations in adult and pediatric patients in Turkey and compare these with international DRLs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODSCT performance information and examination parameters (for head, chest, high-resolution CT of the chest [HRCT-chest], abdominal, and pelvic protocols) from 1607 hospitals were collected via a survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings from this study are recommended for use as national DRLs in Turkey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSEWe aimed to establish the first diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography (CT) examinations in adult and pediatric patients in Turkey and compare these with international DRLs. METHODSCT performance information and examination parameters (for head, chest, high-resolution CT of the chest [HRCT-chest], abdominal, and pelvic protocols) from 1607 hospitals were collected via a survey. Dose length products and effective doses for standard patient sizes were calculated from the reported volume CT dose index (CTDIvol).RESULTSThe median number of protocols reported from the 167 responding hospitals (10% response rate) was 102 across five different age groups. Third quartile CTDIvol values for adult pelvic and all pedi-atric body protocols were higher than the European Commission standards but were comparable to studies conducted in other countries.CONCLUSIONThe radiation dose indicators for adult patients were similar to those reported in the literature, ex-cept for those associated with head protocols. CT protocol optimization is necessary for adult head and pediatric chest, HRCT-chest, abdominal, and pelvic protocols. The findings from this study are recommended for use as national DRLs in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAÇ, G. K., PARMAKSIZ, A., İNAL, T., BULUR, E., BULGURLU, F., ÖNCÜ, T., GÜNDOĞDU, S. (2015). Patient doses from CT examinations in Turkey. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5, 428–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/350117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Schauer DA, Linton OW. National council on radiation protection and measurements report shows substantial medical exposure increase. Radiology 2009; 253:293-296. [CrossRef] IAEA. International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources. Internation- al Atomic Energy Agency 1996, Safety Series No:115. Santos J, Foley S, Paulo G, McEntee MF, Rainford L. The establishment of computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in Portugal. Radiat Prot Dosim 2014; 158:307-317. [CrossRef] ICRP. 1990 recommendations of the interna- tional commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP 1991; 21:1-3. ICRP. Radiation and your patient--a guide for medical practitioners. Ann ICRP 2001; 31:4. ICRP. 2007 recommendations of the interna- tional commission on radiological protection (users edition). Ann ICRP 2007; 37:2-4. ICRP. Radiological protection in medicine. Ann ICRP 2007; 37:6. Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. Available at: http://ec.europa. eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/doc/legis- lation/9743_en.pdf. http://www.mh-hannover. de/1604.html. Accessed July 11, 2014.
  2. Papaioannou G, Young C, Owens CM. Multi- detector row CT for imaging the paediatric tracheobronchial tree. Pediatr Radiol 2007; 37:515-529. [CrossRef] Lukasiewicz A, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs L, et al. Radiation dose index of renal colic pro- tocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology Na- tional Radiology Data Registry. Radiology 2014; 271:445-451. [CrossRef] Diaconescu C, Iacob O. Survey of diagnostic paediatric radiology and the resulted collec- tive effective dose (2000y). J Prev Med 2002; 10:3-9.
  3. Tack D, Jahnen A, Kohler S, et al. Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit. Eur Radiol 2014; 24:169-175. [CrossRef] Parmaksız A, Atac GK, Bulgurlu F, Bulur E, Öncü T, Inal T. Unintentional irradiation of conceptus by diagnostic imaging examinations in Turkey. Ra- diat Prot Dosim 2013; 162:322-328. [CrossRef] Technical Report, Türkiye'de Radyasyon Kay- nakları 2012. Available at: http://www.taek. gov.tr/belgeler-formlar/func-startdown/886/. Accessed July 11, 2014. National code on clinical researches published in Official Gazette numbered with 28617 at Apr 13, 2013. Accessed 24