Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6

Safety and functionality of transhepatic hemodialysis catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients

Pages
560–565
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The procedure can be performed with high technical success and low complication rates under imaging guidanc

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the safety and functionality of tunneled transhepatic hemodialysis cath-eters in chronic hemodialysis patients.METHODSThirty-eight patients (20 women aged 56±10 years and 18 men aged 61±11 years) with tran-shepatic tunneled hemodialysis catheters were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The date of the first transhepatic catheterization, indications, procedure details, functional time periods of catheters, reasons for the removal or revision of catheters, catheter-related complications, and current conditions of patients were retrospectively analyzed.RESULTSA total of 69 catheters were properly placed in all patients (100% technical success) under imag-ing guidance during the 91-month follow-up period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The procedure can be performed with high technical success and low complication rates under imaging guidanc
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the safety and functionality of tunneled transhepatic hemodialysis cath-eters in chronic hemodialysis patients.METHODSThirty-eight patients (20 women aged 56±10 years and 18 men aged 61±11 years) with tran-shepatic tunneled hemodialysis catheters were evaluated. The date of the first transhepatic catheterization, indications, procedure details, functional time periods of catheters, reasons for the removal or revision of catheters, catheter-related complications, and current conditions of patients were retrospectively analyzed.RESULTSA total of 69 catheters were properly placed in all patients (100% technical success) under imag-ing guidance during the 91-month follow-up period. The functionality of 35 catheters could not be evaluated: five catheters were removed because of noncomplication related reasons (surgical fistulas were opened in two cases [2/35, 5.7%], transplantation was performed in three cases [3/35, 8.6%]), 18 patients died while their catheters were functional (18/35, 51.4%), and 12 cath-eters were still functional at the time of the study (12/35, 34.3%). The functionality of catheters was evaluated the remaining 34 catheters that necessitated revision because of complications. Furthermore, only half of the catheters were functional on day 136 when evaluated using Ka-plan-Meier analysis. The four main complications were thrombosis (16/34, 47%; complication rate of 0.37 days in 100 catheters), infection (8/34, 23.5%; 0.18 days in 100 catheters), migration (8/34, 23.5%; 0.18 days in 100 catheters), and kinking (2/34, 6%; 0.04 days in 100 catheters).CONCLUSIONTranshepatic venous catheterization is a safe and functional alternative route in chronic hemodi-alysis patients without an accessible central venou route. The procedure can be performed with high technical success and low complication rates under imaging guidanc

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞANAL, B., NAS, Ö. F., DOĞAN, N., KORKMAZ, M., HACIKURT, K., YILDIZ, A., KAN, İ. İ. A., HAKYEMEZ, B., ERDOĞAN, C. (2016). Safety and functionality of transhepatic hemodialysis catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6, 560–565. https://ajindex.com/articles/350066

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. MacRae JM, Ahmed A, Johnson N, Levin A, Kiaii M. Central vein stenosis: a common problem in patients on hemodialysis. ASAIO J 2005; 51:77-81. [CrossRef] Stavropoulos SW, Pan JJ, Clark TW, et al. Per- cutaneous transhepatic venous access for he- modialysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:1187- 1190. [CrossRef] Smith TP, Ryan JM, Reddan DN. Transhepatic catheter access for hemodialysis. Radiology 2004; 232:246-251. [CrossRef] Younes HK, Pettigrew CD, Anaya-Ayala JE, et al. Transhepatic hemodialysis catheters: func- tional outcome and comparison between early and late failure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:183-191. [CrossRef] Liu F, Bennett S, Arrigain S, et al. Patency and complications of translumbar dialysis cathe- ters. Semin Dial 2015; 28: 41-47. [CrossRef] Lund GB, Lieberman RP, Haire WD, Martin VA, Kessinger A, Armitage JO. Translumbar inferior vena cava catheters for long-term venous ac- cess. Radiology 1990; 174:31-35. [CrossRef] Rajan DK, Croteau DL, Sturza SG, Harvill ML, Mehall CJ. Translumbar placement of inferior vena caval catheters: a solution for challeng- ing hemodialysis access. Radiographics 1998; 18:1155-1167. [CrossRef] Biswal R, Nosher JL, Siegel RL, Bodner LJ. Translumbar placement of paired hemodialy- sis catheters (Tesio catheters) and follow-up in 10 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000; 23:75-78. [CrossRef] Po CL, Koolpe HA, Allen S, Alvez LD, Raja RM. Transhepatic PermCath for hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24:590-591. [CrossRef] Silberzweig JE, Sacks D, Khorsandi AS, Bakal CW. Reporting standards for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:443-452. [CrossRef] Bergey EA, Kaye RD, Reyes J, Towbin RB. Tran- shepatic insertion of vascular dialysis catheters in children: a safe, life-prolonging procedure. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29:42-45. [CrossRef] Park C, Yim NY, Kim YT, et al. A single-center experience of 2153 tunneled-cuffed catheter insertions radiologically placed via the internal jugular vein: an evaluation of technical success and complication rates relative to underlying disease conditions. J Korean Society of Radiol- ogy 2015; 72:46-56.[CrossRef]