Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Missed lung cancer: when, where, and why?

Pages
118–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Albeit it is hard to remove missed lung cancer completely, strategies to reduce observer error and methods to improve technique and automated detection may be valuable in reducing its likelihood.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Missed lung cancer is a source of concern among radiologists and an important medicolegal challenge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 90% of the cases, errors in diagnosis of lung cancer occur on chest radiographs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Albeit it is hard to remove missed lung cancer completely, strategies to reduce observer error and methods to improve technique and automated detection may be valuable in reducing its likelihood.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Missed lung cancer is a source of concern among radiologists and an important medicolegal challenge. In 90% of the cases, errors in diagnosis of lung cancer occur on chest radiographs. It may be challenging for radiologists to distinguish a lung lesion from bones, pulmonary vessels, mediastinal structures, and other complex anatomical structures on chest radiographs. Never-theless, lung cancer can also be overlooked on computed tomography (CT) scans, regardless of the context, either if a clinical or radiologic suspect exists or for other reasons. Awareness of the possible causes of overlooking a pulmonary lesion can give radiologists a chance to reduce the occurrence of this eventuality. Various factors contribute to a misdiagnosis of lung cancer on chest radiographs and on CT, often very similar in nature to each other. Observer error is the most significant one and comprises scanning error, recognition error, decision-making error, and satisfaction of search. Tumor characteristics such as lesion size, conspicuity, and location are also crucial in this context. Even technical aspects can contribute to the probability of skipping lung cancer, including image quality and patient positioning and movement. Albeit it is hard to remove missed lung cancer completely, strategies to reduce observer error and methods to improve technique and automated detection may be valuable in reducing its likelihood.

🔖

Cite This Article

CIELLO, A. D., FRANCHİ, P., CONTEGİACOMO, A., CİCCHETTİ, G., BONOMO, L., LARİCİ, A. R. (2017). Missed lung cancer: when, where, and why?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 118–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/350039

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. World Health Organization. Cancer. Fact Sheet Number 297. Available at: www.who.int/me- diacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ Last updated July 2015. Accessed July 10, 2015.
  2. Groome PA, Bolejack V, Crowley JJ, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2:694-705. [CrossRef] Shah PK, Austin JH, White CS, et al. Missed non- small cell lung cancer: radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retro- spect. Radiology 2003; 226:235-241. [CrossRef] White CS, Salis AI, Meyer CA. Missed lung can- cer on chest radiography and computed to- mography: imaging and medicolegal issue. J Thorac Imaging 1999; 14:63-68. [CrossRef] Turkington PM, Kennan N, Greenstone MA. Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in delayed diagnosis of lung cancer. Postgrad Med J 2002; 78:158-160. [CrossRef] Brogdon BG, Kelsey CA, Moseley RD. Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. Ra- diol Clin North Am 1983; 21:633-654.
  3. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D. Visual scan- ning, pattern recognition, and decision making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 1978; 13:175-181. [CrossRef] Manning D, Barker-Mill SC, Donovan T, Craw- ford T. Time-dependent observer errors in pulmonary nodule detection. Br J Radiol 2006; 79:342-346. [CrossRef] Manning DJ, Ethell SC, Donovan T. Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the postero-anterior chest radiograph. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 231-235. [CrossRef] Kundel HL, La Follette PS. Visual search pat- terns and experience with radiological images. Radiology 1972; 103:523-528. [CrossRef] Samuel S, Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Toto LC. Mech- anism of satisfaction of search: eye position re- cordings in the reading of chest radiographs. Radiology 1995; 194:895-902. [CrossRef] Quekel LG, Kessels AG, Goei R, van Engelshoven JM. Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radio- graph in clinical practice. Chest 1999; 115:720- 724. [CrossRef] Austin JH, Romney BM, Goldsmith LS. Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic find- ings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 1992; 182:115-122. [CrossRef] Monnier-Cholley L, Arrivè L, Porcel A, et al. Characteristics of missed lung cancer on chest radiographs: a French experience. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:597-605. [CrossRef] Wu MH, Got