Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Discrimination of oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma using MRI

Pages
5–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the excretory phase of dynamic enhanced images, oncocytomas have higher signal intensity ratio than chro-mophobe RCC and high wash-in values strongly imply a diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, including signal intensities, enhancement patterns and T2 signal intensity ratios to differentiate oncocytoma from chromo-phobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC).METHODSThis retrospective study included 17 patients with oncocytoma and 33 patients with chromo-phobe RCC who underwent dynamic MRI.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Morphologic characteristics, T1 and T2 signal intensities were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the excretory phase of dynamic enhanced images, oncocytomas have higher signal intensity ratio than chro-mophobe RCC and high wash-in values strongly imply a diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, including signal intensities, enhancement patterns and T2 signal intensity ratios to differentiate oncocytoma from chromo-phobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC).METHODSThis retrospective study included 17 patients with oncocytoma and 33 patients with chromo-phobe RCC who underwent dynamic MRI. Two radiologists independently reviewed images blinded to pathology. Morphologic characteristics, T1 and T2 signal intensities were reviewed. T2 signal intensities, wash-in, wash-out values, T2 signal intensity ratios were calculated. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. RESULTSMean ages of patients with oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC were 61.0±11.6 and 58.5±14.0 years, respectively. Mean tumor size was 60.6±47.3 mm for oncocytoma, 61.7±45.9 mm for chro-mophobe RCC. Qualitative imaging findings in conventional MRI have no distinctive feature in discrimination of two tumors. Regarding signal intensity ratios, oncocytomas were higher than chromophobe RCCs. Renal oncocytomas showed higher signal intensity ratios and wash-in val-ues than chromophobe RCCs in all phases. Fast spin-echo T2 signal intensities were higher in oncocytomas than chromophobe RCCs. CONCLUSIONSignal intensity ratios, fast spin-echo T2 signal intensities and wash-in values constitute diag-nostic parameters for discriminating between oncoytomas and chromophobes. In the excretory phase of dynamic enhanced images, oncocytomas have higher signal intensity ratio than chro-mophobe RCC and high wash-in values strongly imply a diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.

🔖

Cite This Article

BASARA, I., ALTAY, C., GÜLER, E., ÇAMLIDAĞ, İ., HARMAN, M., DANACI, M., TUNA, E. B., YÖRÜKOĞLU, K., SEÇİL, M. (2019). Discrimination of oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma using MRI. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 5–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/350016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male gen-ital organs- part a: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 2016
  2. 93–105. [CrossRef ] 2. Cornelis F, Tricaud E, Lasserre AS, et al. Routine-ly performed multiparametric magnetic reso-nance imaging helps to differentiate common subtypes of renal tumours. Eur Radiol 2014
  3. 1068–1080. [CrossRef ] 3. Sasiwimonphan K, Takahashi N, Leibovich BC, et al. Small ( 4. Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA. World Health Organization classification of tu-mours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press, 2004. 5. Amin MB, Paner GP, Alvarado-Cabrero I, et al. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: histomor-phologic characteristics and evaluation of con-ventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2008
  4. 1822–1834. [CrossRef ] 6. Cornelis F, Lasserre AS, Tourdias T, et al. Com-bined late gadolinium-enhanced and dou-ble-echo chemical-shift MRI help to differen-tiate renal oncocytomas with high central T2 signal intensity from renal cell carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013
  5. 830–838. [CrossRef ] 7. Gakis G, Kramer U, Schilling D, et al. Small renal oncocytomas: differentiation with multiphase CT. Eur J Radiol 2011
  6. 274–278. [CrossRef ] 8. Chen F, Gulati M, Hwang D, et al. Voxel-based whole-lesion enhancement parameters: a study of its clinical value in differentiating clear cell re-nal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma. Ab-dom Radiol 2017
  7. 552–560. [CrossRef ] 9. Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2003
  8. 612–624. [CrossRef ] 10. Tikkakoski T, Paivansalo M, Alanen A, et al. Ra-diologic findings in renal oncocytoma. Acta Radiol 1991
  9. 363–367. [CrossRef ] 11. Quinn MJ, Hartman DS, Friedman AC, et al. Re-nal oncocytoma: new observations. Radiology 1984
  10. 49–53. [CrossRef ] 12. Rosenkrantz AB, Hindman N, Fitzgerald EF, et al. MRI features of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010
  11. 421–427. [CrossRef ] 13. Galmiche C, Bernhard JC, Yacoub M, et al. Is multiparametric MRI useful for differentiat-ing oncocytomas from chromophobe renal cell carcinomas? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017
  12. 343–350. [CrossRef ] 14. Williamson SR, Gadde R, Trpkov K, et al. Diag-nos