Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Stent insertion and balloon angioplasty for portal vein stenosis after liver transplantation: long-term follow-up results

Pages
231–237
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Balloon angioplasty seems less risky foranastomotic ruptures in portal vein stenosis in the early post liver transplantation period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEIt is not easy to determine whether balloon angioplasty or stenting should be performed in patients with portal vein stenosis after liver transplantation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to propose appropriate indication by evaluating long-term outcomes of balloon angioplasty and stent insertion in adultliver transplant patients.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with portal vein stenosis among 1369 patients who underwent adult liver transplantation from January 2001 to December 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Balloon angioplasty seems less risky foranastomotic ruptures in portal vein stenosis in the early post liver transplantation period.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSEIt is not easy to determine whether balloon angioplasty or stenting should be performed in patients with portal vein stenosis after liver transplantation. We aimed to propose appropriate indication by evaluating long-term outcomes of balloon angioplasty and stent insertion in adultliver transplant patients.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with portal vein stenosis among 1369 patients who underwent adult liver transplantation from January 2001 to December 2015. When stenosis wasconfirmed by venography, angioplasty was performed first. When there was no flow improvement or pressure gradient was not decreased after angioplasty, stent insertion was performed.We also performed primary stent insertion without angioplasty for diffuse stenosis, kinking,external compression, and near occlusion of portal vein in venography. We assessed patencyin patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent insertion throughregular outpatient follow-up and evaluated technical and clinical success and long-term results.RESULTSTechnical success was 85% and 100% in balloon angioplasty and stent insertion, respectively.Clinical success was achieved in 78% of balloon angioplasties and in 100% of stent insertions. At1, 5, and 10 years after balloon angioplasty, patency rates were 87%, 82%, and 68% respectively,and the rates of stent patency were all 100%. Portal vein size measured during the operation ofpatients with and without recurrence were 19±4.2 mm and 19±3.0 mm (P = 0.956), respectively.The balloon size of patients with and without recurrence were 11±1.95 mm and 14±1.66 mm,respectively (P = 0.013), when balloon angioplasty was performed after stenosis diagnosis.CONCLUSIONStent insertion can be considered when fibrotic changes are expected due to repeated inflammation and when the balloon size to be used is small. Balloon angioplasty seems less risky foranastomotic ruptures in portal vein stenosis in the early post liver transplantation period.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIM, K. S., KIM, J. M., LEE, J. S., CHOI, G. S., CHO, J., LEE, S. (2019). Stent insertion and balloon angioplasty for portal vein stenosis after liver transplantation: long-term follow-up results. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 231–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/350013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Rodriguez JA, Becker NS, O'Mahony CA, Goss JA, Aloia TA. Long-term outcomes following liver transplantation for hepatic hemangioendothelioma: the UNOS experience from 1987 to 2005. J Gastrointest Surg 2008
  2. 110–116. [CrossRef] 2. Thayer WP, Claridge JA, Pelletier SJ, et al. Portal vein reconstruction in right lobe living-donor liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 2002
  3. 96–98. [CrossRef] 3. Woo DH, Laberge JM, Gordon RL, Wilson MW, Kerlan RK, Jr. Management of portal venous complications after liver transplantation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2007
  4. 233–239. [CrossRef] 4. Piardi T, Lhuaire M, Bruno O, et al. Vascular complications following liver transplantation: A literature review of advances in 2015. World J Hepatol 2016
  5. 36–57. [CrossRef] 5. Ueda M, Egawa H, Ogawa K, et al. Portal vein complications in the long-term course after pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2005
  6. 1138–1140. [CrossRef] 6. Schneider N, Scanga A, Stokes L, Perri R. Portal vein stenosis: a rare yet clinically important cause of delayed-onset ascites after adult deceased donor liver transplantation: two case reports. Transplant Proc 2011
  7. 3829–3834. [CrossRef] 7. Khalaf H. Vascular complications after deceased and living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc 2010
  8. 865–870. [CrossRef] 8. Olcott EW, Ring EJ, Roberts JP, Ascher NL, Lake JR, Gordon RL. Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein angioplasty and stent placement after liver transplantation: early experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1990
  9. 17–22. [CrossRef] 9. Wang JF, Zhai RY, Wei BJ, et al. Percutaneous intravascular stents for treatment of portal venous stenosis after liver transplantation: midterm results. Transplant Proc 2006
  10. 1461– 1462. [CrossRef] 10. Kato A, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M, Yoshitomi H, Furukawa K, Miyazaki M. Portal vein stent placement for the treatment of postoperative portal vein stenosis: long-term success and factor associated with stent failure. BMC Surg 2017
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Gao H, Wang H, Chen G, Yi Z. Intervention therapy for portal vein stenosis/occlusion after pediatric liver transplantation. Ann Transplant 2017
  12. 222–229. [CrossRef] 12. Carnevale FC, de Tarso Machado A, Moreira AM, et al. Long-term results of the percutaneous transhepatic venoplasty of portal vein stenoses after pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2011
  13. 476–481. [CrossRef] 13. Yabuta M, Shibata T, Shibata T, et al. Long-term outc