Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5

Long-term follow-up of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with stent-graft

Pages
346–352
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The median overallsurvival was 42.8 months (95% CI, 33.8–51.8 months).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEWe aimed to retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical and patency results after the placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) using stent-graft.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, few studies show long-term results.METHODSBetween 2002 and 2016, TIPS with stent-grafts were placed in 132 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The median overallsurvival was 42.8 months (95% CI, 33.8–51.8 months).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSEWe aimed to retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical and patency results after the placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) using stent-graft. Many studiesshow the clinical results and the patency follow-up of TIPS with stent-graft in the short and medium term. However, few studies show long-term results.METHODSBetween 2002 and 2016, TIPS with stent-grafts were placed in 132 patients. The median age was59.5 years. The median Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 13, and 71% wereChild-Pugh B. Indications for TIPS were bleeding (83%) and ascites or hydrothorax (17%). Thetechnical and clinical success rates were calculated, as were the rates of patency, survival andcomplications. The median follow-up period was 43 months.RESULTSThe technical success rate was 98%, and the clinical success rates were 85% in patients withindication for bleeding and 95% in patients with indication for ascites or hydrothorax. Primarypatency did not decrease from 66% after 6 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.2%–75.8%) primary assisted patency remained stable at 87% after 6 years (95% CI, 77.2%–96.8%) and secondary patency did not decrease from 98% after 4 years (95% CI, 95.1%–100%). The median overallsurvival was 42.8 months (95% CI, 33.8–51.8 months). A total of 54 patients suffered some type ofcomplication, minor (28 patients) or major (26 patients), during the follow-up.CONCLUSIONThe clinical success rate was high. The choice of the maximum initial limit of portosystemic gradient and the diameter of the post-TIPS shunt, together with the number of shunt reductions, areimportant to be able to compare results between publications. In our study, the patency rates didnot decrease after 6 years; hence, long-term follow-up of these patients may not be necessary

🔖

Cite This Article

PERELLO, M. P., MUR, J. P., VİVES, M. S., RIUTORT, J. M. M., ARTIGUES, A. N. P., GARCIA, C. N., VIDAL, M. L. B., GELABERT, A. E., GARAU, M. V. (2019). Long-term follow-up of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with stent-graft. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5, 346–352. https://ajindex.com/articles/350001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Krajina A, Hulek P, Fejfar T, Valek V. Quality improvement guidelines for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012
  2. 1295–1300. [CrossRef] 2. Copelan A, Kapoor B, Sands M. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: indications, contraindications, and patient work-up. Semin Intervent Radiol 2014
  3. 235–242. [CrossRef] 3. Berry K, Lerrigo R, Liou IW, Ioannou GN. Association between transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and survival in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016
  4. 118–123. [CrossRef] 4. Richter GM, Palmaz JC, Nöldge G, et al. Der Transjuguläre intrahepatische portosystemische Stent-Shunt (TIPSS). Eine neue nichtoperative, perkutane methode. Radiologe 1989
  5. 406–411. 5. Barrio J, Ripoll C, Bañares R, et al. Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction in PTFE-covered stent-grafts versus bare stents. Eur J Radiol 2005
  6. 120– 124. [CrossRef] 6. Gupta AC, Wang W, Shah C, et al. Added value of covered stents in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a large single-center experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017
  7. 1723–1731. [CrossRef] 7. Charon JP, Alaeddin FH, Pimpalwar SA, et al. Results of a retrospective multicenter trial of the Viatorr expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004
  8. 1219–1230. [CrossRef] 8. Rössle M, Siegerstetter V, Euringer W, et al. The use of a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): Long-term follow-up of 100 patients. Acta Radiol 2006
  9. 660–666. [CrossRef] 9. Gaba RC, Omene BO, Podczerwinski ES, et al. TIPS for treatment of variceal hemorrhage: clinical outcomes in 128 patients at a single institution over a 12-year period. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012
  10. 227–235. [CrossRef] 10. Saad WE, Darwish WM, Davies MG, Waldman DL. Stent-grafts for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: specialized TIPS stent-graft versus generic stent-graft/bare stent combination. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010
  11. 1512–1520. [CrossRef] 11. Tripathi D, Ferguson J, Barkell H, et al. Improved clinical outcome with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt utilizing polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006
  12. 225–232. [CrossRef] 12. Vignali C, Bargellini I, Grosso M, et al. TIPS with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-co