Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

MRI in the evaluation of the azoospermic male

Pages
271–276
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Abnormalities typical for obstruction of the male reproductive tract (e.g., dilatation of ejaculatory ducts, prostatic or seminal vesicle cysts) were found in 78% of patients (14/18) in the obstructive group.CONCLUSIONScrotal MRI is a very effective tool for the evaluation of azoospermic men and may provide important information facilitating interventional treatment of infertility.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEWe aimed to show the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of infertile men and its ability to distinguish obstructive from nonobstructive azoospermia.METHODSBetween April 2015 and February 2018, 45 azoospermic men underwent scrotal MRI.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Testicular volume (TV), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, T1 and T2 signal ratios (testis/muscle) were measured for every testis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Abnormalities typical for obstruction of the male reproductive tract (e.g., dilatation of ejaculatory ducts, prostatic or seminal vesicle cysts) were found in 78% of patients (14/18) in the obstructive group.CONCLUSIONScrotal MRI is a very effective tool for the evaluation of azoospermic men and may provide important information facilitating interventional treatment of infertility.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSEWe aimed to show the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of infertile men and its ability to distinguish obstructive from nonobstructive azoospermia.METHODSBetween April 2015 and February 2018, 45 azoospermic men underwent scrotal MRI. We evaluated the images with an emphasis on signal characteristics of the testis and morphologic changes typical for obstruction. Testicular volume (TV), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, T1 and T2 signal ratios (testis/muscle) were measured for every testis. On the basis of histologic results, patients were divided into two groups: obstructive azoospermia (OA) and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).RESULTSTestes of patients in the OA group had significantly lower ADC values (mean 0.876±101 ×10-3 mm2/s) than in the NOA group (mean, 1.114±147 ×10-3 mm2/s). TV was significantly higher in patients with OA (median, 17.61 mL; range, 11.1–38.4 mL) than in those with NOA (median, 10.5 mL; range, 5.2–22.2 mL). ROC analysis showed that both TV and ADC values were highly predictive for distinguishing between OA and NOA patients, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82 and 0.92 respectively. A cutoff value of ≥12.4 mL could distinguish obstructive from nonobstructive azoospermia with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 63%, whereas for ADC measurements a cutoff value of ≥0.952 ×10-3 mm2/s exhibited a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 90%. There was no statistically significant difference in T1 and T2 signal ratios between the two groups. Abnormalities typical for obstruction of the male reproductive tract (e.g., dilatation of ejaculatory ducts, prostatic or seminal vesicle cysts) were found in 78% of patients (14/18) in the obstructive group.CONCLUSIONScrotal MRI is a very effective tool for the evaluation of azoospermic men and may provide important information facilitating interventional treatment of infertility.

🔖

Cite This Article

REGENT, B., SKROBİSZ, K., KOZAK, O., MATUSZEWSKI, M., STUDNIAREK, M. (2020). MRI in the evaluation of the azoospermic male. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 271–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/349980

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015
  2. 1–9. [Crossref] 2. Phse G, Hense J, Bergmann M, Kliesch S. Bilateral histological evaluation of exocrine testicular function in men with obstructive azoospermia: condition of spermatogenesis and andrological implications? Hum Reprod 2011
  3. 2606–2612. [Crossref] 3. Wosnitzer M, Goldstein M, Hardy MP. Review of azoospermia. Spermatogenesis 2014
  4. e28218. [Crossref] 4. Hwang K, Smith JF, Coward RM, et al. Evaluation of the azoospermic male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018
  5. 777–782. [Crossref] 5. Sakamoto H, Saito K, Oohta M, Inoue K, Ogawa Y, Yoshida H. Testicular volume measurement: comparison of ultrasonography, orchidometry, and water displacement. Urology 2007
  6. 152–157. [Crossref] 6. Moon MH, Kim SH, Cho JY, Seo JT, Chun YK. Scrotal US for evaluation of infertile men with azoospermia. Radiology 2006
  7. 168–73. [Crossref] 7. Ammar T, Sidhu PS, Wilkins CJ. Male infertility: the role of imaging in diagnosis and management. Br J Radiol 2012
  8. 85 (Spec issue 1):S59–68. [Crossref] 8. Tsili AC, Bertolotto M, Turgut AT, et al. MRI of the scrotum: Recommendations of the ESUR scrotal and penile imaging working group. Eur Radiol 2018
  9. 31–43. [Crossref] 9. Tsili AC, Bertolotto M, Rocher L, et al. Sonographically indeterminate scrotal masses: how MRI helps in characterization. Diagn Interv Radiol 2018
  10. 225–236. [Crossref] 10. Tsili AC, Ntorkou A, Goussia A, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging parameters in testes with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018
  11. 1318–1325. [Crossref] 11. Han BH, Park S Bin, Seo JT, Chun YK. Usefulness of testicular volume, apparent diffusion coefficient, and normalized apparent diffusion coefficient in the MRI evaluation of infertile men with azoospermia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018
  12. 543–548. [Crossref] 12. Holstein AF, Schulze W, Davidoff M. Understanding spermatogenesis is a prerequisite for treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003
  13. 1–16. [Crossref] 13. Walschaerts M, Bujan L, Isus F, Parinaud J, Mieusset R, Thonneau P. Cumulative parenthood rates in 1735 couples: Impact of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 2012
  14. 1184–1190. [Crossref] 14. Baker K, Sabanegh E. Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results. Clinics 2013
  15. 68 (Suppl 1):61–73. [Crossref] 15. Fisch H, Lambert SM, Goluboff ET. Management of ejaculatory duct obstruction: Etiology, diagnosi