SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

ArtVentive endoluminal occlusion system for proximal splenic artery embolization

Heather K. MORIARTY
Warren CLEMENTS
Jim KOUKOUNARAS
Gerard S. GOH
Tim JOSEPH
Tuan PHAN
Pages
488–491
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This early data supports the efficacy of the EOS plug for the embolization of the proximal splenic artery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We aimed to discuss and evaluate the technical success and efficacy of the ArtVentive endoluminal occlusion system (EOS) device for splenic embolization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were 5 male and 1 female patients; age range was 24–88 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This early data supports the efficacy of the EOS plug for the embolization of the proximal splenic artery.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

We aimed to discuss and evaluate the technical success and efficacy of the ArtVentive endoluminal occlusion system (EOS) device for splenic embolization. A retrospective review was undertaken for all patients in whom the EOS device was deployed for the purpose of splenic embolization. Data was collected by a search of splenic artery embolization procedures in the hospital computer database. Data was reviewed for all patients in whom an EOS plug was deployed. Patient demographics, technical aspects of the procedure and follow-up at one month were reviewed. We review the technical success and efficacy of this occlusion device. Six patients underwent splenic embolization with the EOS plug. There were 5 male and 1 female patients; age range was 24–88 years. Five 8 mm and one 5 mm EOS plugs were deployed for the occlusion of the splenic artery. The technical success rate was 100% occurring in all 6 splenic arteries. One patient underwent a second angiogram and subsequent splenectomy for persistent splenic hemorrhage. One patient had a subsequent splenectomy for bacteremia with the spleen as the suspected source. This early data supports the efficacy of the EOS plug for the embolization of the proximal splenic artery.

🔖

Cite This Article

MORIARTY, H. K., CLEMENTS, W., KOUKOUNARAS, J., GOH, G. S., JOSEPH, T., PHAN, T. (2020). ArtVentive endoluminal occlusion system for proximal splenic artery embolization. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 488–491. https://ajindex.com/articles/349962

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. van der Vlies C, Hoekstra J, Ponsen K, Reekers J, van Delden O, Goslings J. non-surgical management of blunt splenic trauma: a comparative analysis of non-operative management and splenic artery embolization—experience from a European trauma center. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41:1324–1332. [Crossref] 2. Venbrux A, Gailloud P, Radvany MG, et al. Acute, subacute, and long- term evaluation of a novel endovascular occlusion system in a large animal model. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 85:1026–1032. [Crossref] 3. Venbrux A, Rudakov L, Plass A, Emmert M, Ebner A. A new occlusion device: application of the ArtVentive endoluminal occlusion system (EOS)—first in human clinical trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:85–93. [Crossref] 4. Pyra K, Woz'niak S, Drelich-Zbroja A, WolskIi, Jargiełło T. Evaluation of effectiveness of embolization in pelvic congestion syndrome with the new vascular occlusion device (ArtVentive EOSTM): preliminary results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39:1122–1127. [Crossref] 5. Tamrazi A, Wadhwa V, Duarte A, Hong K. Successful occlusion of the splenic artery using the endoluminal occlusion system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:1412–1414. [Crossref] 6. Stassen NA, Bhullar I, Cheng JD, et al. Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73:S294–300. [Crossref] 7. Smith H, Biffl W, Majercik S, Jednacz J, Lambiase R, Cioffi W. Splenic artery embolization: have we gone too far? J Trauma 2006; 61:541–544. [Crossref] 8. Zhu X, Tam M, Pierce G, McLennan G, Sands M, Lieber M, Wang W. Utility of the Amplatzer Vascular Plug in splenic artery embolization: a comparison study with conventional coil technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34:522–531. [Crossref]