Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of common carotid artery in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients through speckle tracking carotid strain ultrasonography

Pages
195–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We also analyzed the patients’ overall body composition.RESULTST1DM and control groups were compared in terms of strain and stiffness parameters and nostatistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of speckle tracking carotid strain (STCS) technique,which enables measurement of arterial stiffness and strain parameters, in the detection ofearly atherosclerotic findings in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).METHODSWe prospectively enrolled 30 T1DM patients and 30 age- and sex-matched control participants with no history of cardiovascular disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, the strain (%), strainrate (per second), and peak circumferential and radial displacements (mm) were calculated.Arterial stiffness parameters, such as elastic modulus, distensibility, arterial compliance, andβ-stiffness index, were calculated using the radial measurements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We also analyzed the patients’ overall body composition.RESULTST1DM and control groups were compared in terms of strain and stiffness parameters and nostatistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSEWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of speckle tracking carotid strain (STCS) technique,which enables measurement of arterial stiffness and strain parameters, in the detection ofearly atherosclerotic findings in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).METHODSWe prospectively enrolled 30 T1DM patients and 30 age- and sex-matched control participants with no history of cardiovascular disease. All study population underwent carotid ultrasonography. Radial and circumferential movement of the common carotid artery (CCA) inthe transverse plane as the well as the radial movement of the CCA in the longitudinal planewere calculated automatically by using the STCS method. In addition, the strain (%), strainrate (per second), and peak circumferential and radial displacements (mm) were calculated.Arterial stiffness parameters, such as elastic modulus, distensibility, arterial compliance, andβ-stiffness index, were calculated using the radial measurements. The mean value of the carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) was calculated semi-automatically for each CCA, in thelongitudinal plane. We also analyzed the patients’ overall body composition.RESULTST1DM and control groups were compared in terms of strain and stiffness parameters and nostatistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05). CIMT was higher in diabetic patientsthan in the control group (p = 0.039). In both groups, age was correlated with all arterialstiffness and strain parameters (p < 0.05). The duration of diabetes was also correlated withβ-stiffness index, distensibility, and elastic modulus in the longitudinal plane (p < 0.05). In thediabetic group, abdominal fat ratio, whole body fat ratio, and fat mass were correlated withradial and circumferential displacement and strain parameters in transverse plane, and radialdisplacement in longitudinal plane (p < 0.05, for each). Diabetic patients were divided intosubgroups according to the presence of nephropathy and dyslipidemia. Although no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of CIMT, patients with nephropathyhad higher values for transverse and longitudinal elastic modulus, pulse-wave velocity, andlongitudinal β-stiffness index, as well as lower values for longitudinal arterial compliance anddistensibility, compared with patients without nephropathy (p < 0.05). Also, patients withdyslipidemia had higher longitudinal β-stiffness and elastic modulus values compared withpatients without dyslipidemia (p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSTCS ultrasonography is an effective, easy, and noninvasive method for evaluating the arterial elasticity. It may provide an early assessment of atherosclerosis in patients with T1DM,especially in the presence of nephropathy and dyslipidemia; thus, together with CIMT measurement, it may be used more frequently to detect subclinical damage and stratify atherosclerosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

CERİT, M. N., ŞENDUR, H. N., BOLAYIR, B., CERİT, E. T., CİNDİL, E., AKTÜRK, M. Y., TÖRÜNER, F. B., OKTAR, S. Ö. (2021). Evaluation of common carotid artery in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients through speckle tracking carotid strain ultrasonography. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 195–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/349954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Khunti K, Davies M, Majeed A, Thorsted BL, Wolden ML, Paul SK. Hypoglycemia and risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in insulin treated people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a cohort study. Diabetes Care 2015
  2. 316–322. [Crossref] 2. Schofield J. Ho J. Soran H. Cardiovascular risk in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Ther 2019
  3. 773–789. [Crossref] 3. Duarte SV, de Souza Rajão J, Pinho JF, et al. Changes in aortic pulse wave components, pulse pressure amplification, and hemodynamic parameters of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2019
  4. 202–209. [Crossref] 4. Wagenseil JE, Mecham RP. Elastin in large artery stiffness and hypertension. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2012
  5. 264–273. [Crossref] 5. Nair SB, Malik R, Khattar RS. Carotid intima-media thickness: ultrasound measurement, prognostic value and role in clinical practice. Postgrad Med J 2012
  6. 694–699. [Crossref] 6. Gamble G, Zorn J, Sanders G, MacMahon S, Sharpe N. Estimation of arterial stiffness, compliance, and distensibility from M-mode ultrasound measurements of the common carotid artery. Stroke 1994
  7. 11–16. [Crossref] 7. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 1999
  8. 14–22. [Crossref] 8. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 1997
  9. 1432–1437. [Crossref] 9. Wada T, Kodaira K, Fujishiro K, et al. Correlation of ultrasound-measured common carotid artery stiffness with pathological findings. Arterioscler Thromb 1994
  10. 479–482. [Crossref] 10. Kim SA, Park SM, Kim MN, et al. The relationship between mechanical properties of carotid artery and coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012
  11. 568–573. [Crossref] 11. Podgórski M, Szatko K, Stańczyk M, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking versus applanation tonometry in evaluation of subclinical atherosclerosis in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Med Sci Monit 2019
  12. 7289–7294. [Crossref] 12. Wang KL, Cheng HM, Chuang SY, et al. Central or peripheral systolic or pulse pressure: which best relates to target organs and future mortality? J Hypertens 2009
  13. 461–467. [Crossref] 13. Pugh CJA, Stone KJ, Stöhr EJ, et al. Carotid