Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Recent advancement on PD-L1 expression quantification: the radiologist perspective on CT-guided FNAC

Pages
214–218
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In76% of cases, PD-L1 expression level was lower than 50%.CONCLUSIONThe findings of our study indicate that PD-L1 quantification using a cell-block approach onCT-guided FNAC is a feasible and safe technique and should be taken into account alongsidewith core biopsy approach, especially in case of advanced disease and/or fragile and olderpatients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEWe aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of Programmed Death–1/ Programmed Death–Ligand 1 (PD-1/ PD-L1) expression quantification in cytology cell-blocksamples obtained through transthoracic CT-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)from the interventional radiologist’s perspective.METHODSWe performed a consecutive unselected series of 361 CT-guided biopsies of pulmonary nodules and masses which came to our observation from June 2017 to October 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Allthe material obtained was fixed in formalin to obtain a cell-block for the pathologist, whoperformed immunohistochemical analysis to detect PD-L1 expression levels on each sample.RESULTSOf all the analyzed samples, 93.6% (338/361) were defined to be diagnostic, including neoplastic (72%, 260/361) and non-neoplastic lesions (21.6%, 78/361); only 6.4% (23/361) ofthem resulted in nondiagnostic specimens.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In76% of cases, PD-L1 expression level was lower than 50%.CONCLUSIONThe findings of our study indicate that PD-L1 quantification using a cell-block approach onCT-guided FNAC is a feasible and safe technique and should be taken into account alongsidewith core biopsy approach, especially in case of advanced disease and/or fragile and olderpatients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSEWe aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of Programmed Death–1/ Programmed Death–Ligand 1 (PD-1/ PD-L1) expression quantification in cytology cell-blocksamples obtained through transthoracic CT-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)from the interventional radiologist’s perspective.METHODSWe performed a consecutive unselected series of 361 CT-guided biopsies of pulmonary nodules and masses which came to our observation from June 2017 to October 2018. For eachcase, exhaustive clinical, morphologic, molecular and tomographic data were available. Allthe material obtained was fixed in formalin to obtain a cell-block for the pathologist, whoperformed immunohistochemical analysis to detect PD-L1 expression levels on each sample.RESULTSOf all the analyzed samples, 93.6% (338/361) were defined to be diagnostic, including neoplastic (72%, 260/361) and non-neoplastic lesions (21.6%, 78/361); only 6.4% (23/361) ofthem resulted in nondiagnostic specimens. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounted for73.8% of neoplastic lesions (192/260): most of them were adenocarcinoma (83%, 160/192),followed by squamous carcinoma (14%, 27/192) and poorly differentiated carcinoma (3%,5/192). In 96% of NSCLC (184/192), the diagnosis was reached either in the absence of complications or with early minor complications. PD-L1 expression was evaluated in all 192 NSCLCcytology specimens: 180 immunostainings were found to be adequate for PD-L1 testing. In76% of cases, PD-L1 expression level was lower than 50%.CONCLUSIONThe findings of our study indicate that PD-L1 quantification using a cell-block approach onCT-guided FNAC is a feasible and safe technique and should be taken into account alongsidewith core biopsy approach, especially in case of advanced disease and/or fragile and olderpatients.

🔖

Cite This Article

CASALE, S., BORTOLOTTO, C., STELLA, G. M., FİLİPPİ, A. R., GİTTO, S., BOTTİNELLİ, O. M., CARNEVALE, S., MORBİNİ, P., PREDA, L. (2021). Recent advancement on PD-L1 expression quantification: the radiologist perspective on CT-guided FNAC. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 214–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/349945

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 2007
  2. 45(Suppl): S5–S67. [Crossref] 2. Nilesh H, Venkataramu N, Stanley K, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous management of acute lower-extremity ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013
  3. 3–15. [Crossref] 3. Diffin DC, Kandarpa K. Assessment of peripheral intraarterial thrombolysis versus surgical revascularization in acute lower-limb ischemia: a review of limb-salvage and mortality statistics. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1996
  4. 57–63. [Crossref] 4. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997
  5. 517–538. [Crossref] 5. Working Party on Thrombolysis in the Management of Limb Ischemia b Thrombolysis in the management of lower limb peripheral arterial occlusion-a consensus document. Working Party of Thrombolysis in the Management of Limb Ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1998
  6. 207–218. 6. Patel N, Sacks D, Patel Rl, et al. SIR reporting standards for the treatment of acute limb ischemia with use of transluminal removal of arterial thrombus. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003
  7. 14 (Suppl):S453–S465. [Crossref] 7. Berridge DC, Gregson RH, Hopkinson BR, et al. Randomized trial of intra-arterial recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and intra-arterial streptokinase in peripheral arterial thrombolysis. Br J Surg 1991
  8. 988–995. [Crossref] 8. Davis FM, Albright J, Gallagher KA, et al. Early outcomes following endovascular, open surgical, and hybrid revascularization for lower extremity acute limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg 2018
  9. 106–112. [Crossref] 9. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease. Int Angiol 2007
  10. 81–157. [Crossref] 10. Kronlage M, Printz I, Vogel B, et al. A comparative study on endovascular treatment of (sub)acute critical limb ischemia: mechanical thrombectomy vs thrombolysis. Drug Des Devel Ther 2017
  11. 1233–1241. [Crossref] 11. Zehnder T, Birrer M, Do D, et al. Percutanous catheter thrombus aspiration for acute or subacute arterial occlusion of the legs: how much thrombolysis is needed? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000
  12. 41–46. [Crossref] 12. Wissgott C, Kamusella P, Richter A, et al. Mechanical rotational thrombectomy for treatment thrombolysis in acute and subacute occlusion of