Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

TSR guidelines for the practice of teleradiology: 2021 update

Pages
504–510
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It includes relevant definitions andgeneral principles, features organizational modes and qualifications of the practicing parties,lists technical issues, and addresses such management and legal aspects as archiving anddocumentation, security and privacy, reliability, responsibilities, quality inspection and improvement, reimbursement and accountability

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This update of Turkish Society of Radiology’s (TSR) guidelines for the practice of teleradiologyis intended to provide a reference framework for all parties involved in delivering imagingservices away from the immediate vicinity of the patient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This update of Turkish Society of Radiology’s (TSR) guidelines for the practice of teleradiologyis intended to provide a reference framework for all parties involved in delivering imagingservices away from the immediate vicinity of the patient.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It includes relevant definitions andgeneral principles, features organizational modes and qualifications of the practicing parties,lists technical issues, and addresses such management and legal aspects as archiving anddocumentation, security and privacy, reliability, responsibilities, quality inspection and improvement, reimbursement and accountability
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This update of Turkish Society of Radiology’s (TSR) guidelines for the practice of teleradiologyis intended to provide a reference framework for all parties involved in delivering imagingservices away from the immediate vicinity of the patient. It includes relevant definitions andgeneral principles, features organizational modes and qualifications of the practicing parties,lists technical issues, and addresses such management and legal aspects as archiving anddocumentation, security and privacy, reliability, responsibilities, quality inspection and improvement, reimbursement and accountability

🔖

Cite This Article

OZMEN, M. N., DİCLE, O., ŞENOL, U., AYDINGÖZ, Ü. (2021). TSR guidelines for the practice of teleradiology: 2021 update. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 504–510. https://ajindex.com/articles/349938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Turkish Society of Radiology Board of Qualification and Standards. TSR Standards for the Practice of Teleradiology [Turkish]. 9 April 2010
  2. Ranschaert ER et al. Comparison of European (ESR) and American (ACR) white papers on teleradiology: Patient primacy is paramount. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12:174–182. [Crossref] 3. European Society of Radiology. ESR White Paper on Teleradiology: an update from the teleradiology subgroup. Insights Imaging 2014; 5:1–8. [Crossref] 4. European Society of Radiology. ESR teleradiology survey: results. Insights Imaging 2016; 7:463–479. [Crossref] 5. Silvia E III et al. ACR White Paper on Teleradiology Practice: a report from the task force on teleradiology practice. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10:575–585. [Crossref] 6. Royal College of Radiology. Standards for the Provision of Teleradiology within the United Kingdom, Second Edition. 23 June 2016
  3. Republic of Turkey Personal Data Protection Authority. Law (No. 6698) on the Protection of Personal Data. Ratified 24 March 2016. https:// www.kvkk.gov.tr/Icerik/6649/Personal-Data-Protection-Law. Accessed 11 May 2021
  4. American College of Radiology. ACR–AAPM– SIIM Technical Standard for Electronic Practice of Medical Imaging. 2017
  5. Kagadis GC et al. Medical imaging displays and their use in image interpretation. RadioGraphics 2013; 33:275–290. [Crossref] 10. Compton K, Oosterwijk H. Requirements for medical imaging monitors (part I). https://otechimg.com/publications/pdf/wp_medical_image_monitors.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2021
  6. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Part 14: Grayscale standard display function. 2011
  7. McIlgorm DJ, McNulty JP. DICOM. Part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated “commercial off-the-shelf” (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44:20140148. [Crossref] 13. Salazar AJ et al. DICOM gray-scale standard display function: clinical diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography in medical-grade gray-scale and consumer-grade color displays. AJR Am J Roentegenol 2014; 202:1272–1280. [Crossref] 14. Harisinghani MG, Blake MA, Saksena M, Hahn PF, Gervais D, Zalis M, da Silva Dias Fernandes L, Mueller PR. Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites. Radiographics 2004; 24:615–627. [Crossref] 15. García-Lallana A, Viteri-Ramírez G, Saiz-Mendiguren R, Broncano J, Dámaso Aquerreta J. Ergono