Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Use of full-dose contrast-enhanced CT for extrahepatic staging using Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Pages
573–579
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall lesion-basedsensitivity for full-dose PET/ceCT was 97%, specificity 86%, negative predictive value (NPV)93%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 93%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEStudies have demonstrated that positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT) with Gallium-68 (68Ga)-labeled somatostatin analogues are effective at detectingmetastatic disease in neuroendocrine tumors (NET), especially extrahepatic metastases.However, PET in combination with full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) exposes patients tohigher radiation (~25 mSv).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The use of non-contrast-enhanced low-dose CT (ldCT) can reduceradiation to about 10 mSv and may avoid contrast-induced side effects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall lesion-basedsensitivity for full-dose PET/ceCT was 97%, specificity 86%, negative predictive value (NPV)93%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 93%.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSEStudies have demonstrated that positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT) with Gallium-68 (68Ga)-labeled somatostatin analogues are effective at detectingmetastatic disease in neuroendocrine tumors (NET), especially extrahepatic metastases.However, PET in combination with full-dose contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) exposes patients tohigher radiation (~25 mSv). The use of non-contrast-enhanced low-dose CT (ldCT) can reduceradiation to about 10 mSv and may avoid contrast-induced side effects. This study seeks todetermine whether ceCT could be omitted from NET assessments.METHODSWe retrospectively compared the performance of PET/ldCT versus PET/ceCT in 54 patients(26 male, 28 female) who had undergone a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. The selection criteria wereas follows: available ldCT and ceCT, histologically confirmed NET, and follow-up of at least 6months (median, 12.6 months; range, 6.1–23.2 months). The PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT imageswere analyzed separately. We reviewed metastases in the lungs, bones, and lymph nodes. Theresults were compared with the reference standard (clinical follow-up data).RESULTSThe PET/ceCT scans detected 139 true-positive bone lesions compared with 140 lesionsdetected by the PET/ldCT scans, 106 true-positive lymph node metastases (PET/ceCT) compared with 90 metastases detected by the PET/ldCT scans, and 26 true-positive lung lesions(PET/ceCT) compared with 6 lesions detected by the PET/ldCT scans. The overall lesion-basedsensitivity for full-dose PET/ceCT was 97%, specificity 86%, negative predictive value (NPV)93%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 93%. The overall lesion-based sensitivity for PET/ldCT was 85%, specificity 73%, NPV 72%, and PPV 85%.CONCLUSIONThis study presents the first evidence that ceCT should not be omitted from extrahepaticstaging using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with NET. ceCT alone can be used as a follow-up to reduce radiation exposure when the patient has already undergone PET/ceCT andsuffers from non-DOTATATE-avid NET.

🔖

Cite This Article

APİTZSCH, J., VERBURG, F. A., MOTTAGHY, F., HEİNZEL, A. (2021). Use of full-dose contrast-enhanced CT for extrahepatic staging using Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 573–579. https://ajindex.com/articles/349930

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ambrosini V, Nanni C, Zompatori M, et al. (68) Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in comparison with CT for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37:722–727. [Crossref] 2. Putzer D, Gabriel M, Henninger B, et al. Bone metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumor: 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in comparison to CT and bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 2009; 50:1214–1221. [Crossref] 3. Deroose CM, Hindié E, Kebebew E, et al. Molecular imaging of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Current status and future directions. J Nucl Med 2016. [Crossref] 4. Cuccurullo V, Faggiano A, Scialpi M, et al. Questions and answers: What can be said by diagnostic imaging in neuroendocrine tumors? Minerva Endocrinol 2012; 37:367–377. 5. Kwekkeboom DJ, Mueller-Brand J, Paganelli G, et al. Overview of results of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 3 radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. J Nucl Med 2005; 46 Suppl 1:62S–66S. 6. Zandee WT, de Herder WW. The evolution of neuroendocrine tumor treatment reflected by ENETS guidelines. Neuroendocrinology 2018; 106:357–365. [Crossref] 7. Howe JR, Cardona K, Fraker DL, et al. The surgical management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: Consensus guidelines of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Pancreas 2017; 46:715–731. [Crossref] 8. Strosberg JR, Halfdanarson TR, Bellizzi AM, et al. The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for surveillance and medical management of midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 2017; 46:707–714. [Crossref] 9. Ruf J, Schiefer J, Furth C, et al. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT of neuroendocrine tumors: Spotlight on the CT phases of a triple-phase protocol. J Nucl Med 2011; 52:697–704. [Crossref] 10. Huang B, Law MW, Khong PL. Whole-body PET/CT scanning: Estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology 2009; 251:166–174. [Crossref] 11. Persson M, El Ali HH, Binderup T, et al. Dosimetry of 64Cu-DOTA-AE105, a PET tracer for uPAR imaging. Nucl Med Biol 2014; 41:290–295. [Crossref] 12. van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, et al. Post-contrast acute kidney injury - part 1: Definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors: Recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee Guidelines. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:2845–2855. [Crossref] 13. Meyer GJ, Mäcke H, Schuhmacher J, Knapp WH, Hofmann M. 68Ga-labelled DOTA-derivatised peptide ligands. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 3