Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Liquefaction Potential Analysis and Mapping of Alluvium Soil: A Case Study in Nazilli-Aydın (West Turkey)

Pages
15–23
Publication Date
2020-03-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, the majority of the study area has very high liquefaction potential index.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The importance of urban planning for sustainable cities is indispensable.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with this, firstly drilling was completed at 110 points, with experiments performed on location and geotechnical properties determined in soil samples taken during this process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, the majority of the study area has very high liquefaction potential index.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nazilli · Standard Penetration Test · liquefaction potential

Abstract

The importance of urban planning for sustainable cities is indispensable. For this, the preparation of geotechnical maps, especially, comes to the agenda. Liquefaction susceptibility mapping is important for towns located in first-degree earthquake regions. This study investigated the susceptibility to liquefaction in a possible earthquake in Nazilli (Aydın) county in light of geologic and geotechnical studies. In line with this, firstly drilling was completed at 110 points, with experiments performed on location and geotechnical properties determined in soil samples taken during this process. Generally, the county is founded on alluvial soils with groundwater very close to the surface. This situation makes it important to determine the liquefaction status of the town during a possible earthquake. The liquefaction potential (FL) of the study area was determined with the simplified SPT based method and additionally the liquefaction potential index (LI) was calculated. Using this data and an ArcGIS program, the FL and LI maps of the study area were prepared. According to the results obtained, the majority of the study area has very high liquefaction potential index.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜREKLİ, H., KARACA, Ö. (2020). Liquefaction Potential Analysis and Mapping of Alluvium Soil: A Case Study in Nazilli-Aydın (West Turkey). Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 15–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/34991

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Seed, HB, Idriss IM. 1971. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division ASCE, 107(SM9) 1249-1274
  2. Seed, HB, Idriss, IM. Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA, 1982; pp 134
  3. Iwasaki, T, Tokida, K, Tatsuoka, F, Watanabe, S, Yasuda, S, Sato, H. Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Microzonation, Seattle 3, 1982, pp 1319-1330
  4. Seed, HB, Tokimatsu, K, Harder, LF, Chung, RM. 1985. Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng, 111(12), 1425-1445
  5. Robertson, PK, Wride, CE. 1998. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J, 35(3):442–459
  6. Ulusay, R, Aydan, O, Kumsar, H, Sonmez, H. 2000. Engineering geological characteristics of the 1998 Adana-Ceyhan earthquake, with particular emphasis on liquefaction phenomena and the role of soil behaviour. Bull Eng Geol Env, 59:99-118
  7. Youd, TL, Idriss, IM. 2001. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 4, April, 2001
  8. Youd, TL, Idriss, IM, Andrus, RD, Arango, I, Castro, G, Christian, JT, Dobry, R, Finn, WDL, Harder, LF, Hynes, ME, Ishihara, K, Koester, JP, Liao, SSC, Marcuson, III WF, Martin, GR, Mitchell, JK, Moriwaki, Y, Power, MS, Robertson PK, Seed, RB, Stokoe, II KH. 2001. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech and Geoenviron Eng, 817–833
  9. Seed, RB, Cetin, KO, Moss, RES, Kammerer, AM, Wu, J, Pestana, JM, Riemer, MF, Sancio, RB, Bray, JD, Kayen, RE, Faris, A. 2003. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified and consistent framework. EERC Report No. 2003-06
  10. Cox, BR, Boulanger, RW, Tokimatsu, K, Wood, CM, Abe, A, Ashford S, Donahue J, Ishihara K, Kayen R, Katsumata K, Kishida, T, Kokusho, T, Mason, H.B, Moss, R, Stewart, JP, Tohyama, K, Zekkos, D. Liquefaction at strong motion stations and in Urayasu City during the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, March 2013, Vol. 29, No. S1, pp S55-S80
  11. Korkmaz, KA, Çarhoğlu AI, Usta, P, Gedik, YH. 2013. Tokat