Journals / Archivum Anatolicum-Anadolu Arşivleri / 2016 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

līmmus Not Recorded in the Lists

Listelerde Adları Geçmeyen Līmumlar

Pages
37–40
Publication Date
2017-05-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, we will examine tablets, dated to late (Ib) period of the colonial age, which contains līmmus not recorded in the lists discovered in Kültepe.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:līmums were high-rank officials appointed for one-year term of office in Assyria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Indeed, the līmum lists recently discovered one by one in the Kültepe excavations and published have significantly revealed the chronology of the long- disputed Age of Assyrian Trade Colonies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, we will examine tablets, dated to late (Ib) period of the colonial age, which contains līmmus not recorded in the lists discovered in Kültepe.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Asur Ticaret Kolonileri Devri · Kültepe- Kaniš · Kültepe Tabletleri

Abstract

līmums were high-rank officials appointed for one-year term of office in Assyria. Events which occurred and certain legal transactions executed during the period when there officials remained in office were dated with the names of such officials. For this reason, knowledge of the number of līmums served in that period would suffice to determine the duration of an age. Indeed, the līmum lists recently discovered one by one in the Kültepe excavations and published have significantly revealed the chronology of the long- disputed Age of Assyrian Trade Colonies. In this study, we will examine tablets, dated to late (Ib) period of the colonial age, which contains līmmus not recorded in the lists discovered in Kültepe.

Özet

līmumlar, Asur’da bir yıl süreyle görev yapan yüksek dereceli memurlardır. Görevleri süresince meydana gelen olaylar ve bazı hukukî işlemler onların adıyla tarihleniyordu. Dolayısıyla, bir devrin süresinin tespiti için, o dönemde görev yapmış līmumların sayısının bilinmesi yeterliydi. Kültepe kazılarında bulunan ve son yıllarda arka arkaya yayınlanan līmum listeleri sayesinde, öteden beri tartışma konusu olan Asur Ticaret Kolonileri devrinin kronolojisi büyük ölçüde aydınlanmıştır. Çalışmamızda, koloni devrinin Ib safhasına tarihlenen tabletlerde geçen ve listelerde isimleri bulunmayan līmumları ele alacağız.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAYIR, M. (2017). līmmus Not Recorded in the Lists. Archivum Anatolicum-Anadolu Arşivleri, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 37–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/34844

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Çayır 2015: M. Çayır, “İki Kültepe Tableti ve İki Yeni līmum”, Cahit Günbattı’ya Armağan-Studies Honour of Cahit Günbattı, Ankara 2015, s.39-45, Günbattı 2008: C. Günbattı, “An Eponym List (KEL G) from Kültepe”, Altoriental Forschungen (AoF) 35, 2008, s. 103.132. Veenhof 2003:
  2. K.R. Veenhof, The Old Assyrian List of Year Eponyms Corrections, Additions and Its Chronological Implications, TTKY VI/64, Ankara 2003.