Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 68

Effect of Braced Configuration on Design and Dynamic Performance of Concentrically Braced Frames

Çapraz Konfigürasyonunun Merkezi Çaprazlı Çelik Çerçevelerin Tasarımına ve Dinamik Performansına Etkisi

Pages
399–412
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The obtained results indicated that as the frame span increases, tonnage, elastic stiffness and elastic base shear force of CBFs increases whereas ductility capacity decreases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, dynamic performance of X, inverted-V and split-X typed special concentrically braced frames (CBFs) designed based on Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018) and Design, Calculation and Construction Principles of Steel Structures (DCCPSC-2018) were investigated and compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pursuant to this aim, the nonlinear push-over analyses of a total of 18 CBFs with different number of story, different frame span and different braced configuration were conducted by using Opensees software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The obtained results indicated that as the frame span increases, tonnage, elastic stiffness and elastic base shear force of CBFs increases whereas ductility capacity decreases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:merkezi çaprazlı çelik çerçeve · eşdeğer deprem yükü yöntemi · tasarım

Abstract

In this study, dynamic performance of X, inverted-V and split-X typed special concentrically braced frames (CBFs) designed based on Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018) and Design, Calculation and Construction Principles of Steel Structures (DCCPSC-2018) were investigated and compared. Pursuant to this aim, the nonlinear push-over analyses of a total of 18 CBFs with different number of story, different frame span and different braced configuration were conducted by using Opensees software. In the analysis results, tonnage, elastic stiffness, elastic base shear force and ductility capacity of each CBF were reported. The obtained results indicated that as the frame span increases, tonnage, elastic stiffness and elastic base shear force of CBFs increases whereas ductility capacity decreases. Moreover, it was noticed that split-X typed CBFs were more advantageous than the others in terms of both tonnage and dynamic performance.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (TBDY-2018) ve Çelik Yapıların Tasarım, Hesap ve Yapım Esasları (ÇYTHYE-2018) göz önüne alınarak boyutlandırılan X, ters-V ve parçalı-X tipi çapraz düzenine sahip süneklik düzeyi yüksek merkezi çaprazlı çelik çerçevelerin (MÇÇÇ’lerin) dinamik performansları araştırılarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla, farklı kat sayılı, farklı aks aralıklı ve farklı çapraz düzenine sahip toplam 18 adet MÇÇÇ’nin Opensees programı kullanılarak doğrusal olmayan statik itme analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarında, her bir MÇÇÇ’nin tonajları, elastik rijitlikleri, elastik kesme kuvvetleri ve süneklik kapasiteleri raporlanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, çerçeve açıklığı arttıkça MÇÇÇ’lerin tonajlarının, elastik rijitliklerinin ve elastik taban kesme kuvvetlerinin arttığını fakat süneklik kapasitelerinin düştüğünü göstermektedir. Ayrıca, parçalı-X tipi çapraz düzenine sahip sünekliği yüksek MÇÇÇ’lerin hem tonaj hem de dinamik performans açısından X ve ters-V tipi çapraz düzenine sahip MÇÇÇ’lere kıyasla daha avantajlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, M. B., ZEYBEK, Ö. (2021). Effect of Braced Configuration on Design and Dynamic Performance of Concentrically Braced Frames. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 68, 399–412. https://ajindex.com/articles/348330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bruneau, M., Uang, C.M., Sabelli R. 2011. Ductile Design of Steel Structures. McGraw Hill Professional, 928s. Gioncu, V., Mazzolani, F.M. 2014. Seismic Design of Steel Structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 487s. Workman, G. 1969. The inelastic behavior of multistory braced frame structures subjected to earthquake excitation, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor UMEE 69R1, 159s. Hanson, R. D. and Goel, Subhash C. 1972. Seismic behavior of multistory braced steel frames, Center for Cold-Formed Steel Structures Library. 161, 69s. Bazan, E., Rosenblueth, E. 1974. Seismic Response of One-Story X-Braced Frames, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, vol. 100, ST2, s. 489-493.
  2. Anderson, J.C. 1975. Seismic Behavior of K-Braced Framing Systems", Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, vol. 101, ST10, s. 2147-2159.
  3. Maison, BF, Popov, E.P. 1980. Cyclic response prediction for braced steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 106(7): s. 1401–1416.
  4. Astaneh-Asl, A., Goel, S.C. 1984. Cyclic in-plane buckling of double angle bracing, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 110 (9), s. 2036–2055. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:9(2036).
  5. A.Astaneh-Asl, S.C. Goel, R.D. Hanson, Cyclic out-of-plane buckling of double-angle bracing, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 111 (5) (1985) 1135–1153. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:5(1135). Goel, S.C., El-Tayem, A.A. 1986. Cyclic Load Behavior of Angle X-Bracing, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE,112 (11) s. 2528-2539. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:11(2528). Khatib, I.F., Mahin, S.A. Pister, K.S. 1988. Seismic Behavior of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. Fukuta, T. Nishiyama, I. Yamanouchi, H. Kato, B. 1989. Seismic performance of steel frames with inverted V braces, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 115 (8) s. 2016–2028. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(2016).
  6. Yamanouchi, H., Midorikawa, M., Nishiyama, I., Watabe, M. 1989. Seismic behavior of full-scale concentrically braced steel building structure. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 115(8), s. 1917–1929. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(1917).
  7. Nakashima, M., Wakabayashi, M. 1992. Analysis and design of steel braces and braced frames in building structures. In Y. Fukumoto and G. Lee, (eds.), Stability and ductility of steel structures under cyclic loading, CRC Press,
  8. Boca Raton, USA, s. 309-321.
  9. Sabelli, R., Hohbach, D. 1999. Design of cross-brac