Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism in esophageal cancer susceptibility in Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey

Pages
388–395
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

G-carriers were also more likely to have poorer survival compared to patients with CC genotype (p=0.04).Our results suggest that the Codon 72 polymorphism was not associated with the EC in eastern Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The tumor suppressor TP53 gene plays a key role in the regulation of cell cycle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many studies in other populations have demonstrated thatcodon 72 polymorphism of TP53 gene contribute to the prediction of EC risk, especially in Asians.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:G-carriers were also more likely to have poorer survival compared to patients with CC genotype (p=0.04).Our results suggest that the Codon 72 polymorphism was not associated with the EC in eastern Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The tumor suppressor TP53 gene plays a key role in the regulation of cell cycle. Polymorphisms in this gene have beenassociated with many cancers including esophageal cancer (EC). Many studies in other populations have demonstrated thatcodon 72 polymorphism of TP53 gene contribute to the prediction of EC risk, especially in Asians. The aim of this studywas to explore the effect of codon 72 polymorphism on the EC risk in eastern Turkey.The codon 72 polymorphism was genotyped by real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with TaqMan SNP geno typingassay in 79 patients and 80 healthy control subjects.No statistically significant difference was observed in distribution of genotype and allele frequencies. HeterozygousArg/Pro (CG) was the most frequent genotype in both patients and controls. Homozygous Arg/Arg (GG) genotypefrequency was higher in patients than controls, but not statistically signific ant (p>0.05). However, tumor location in thelower part of the esophagus was significantly higher in non-C carriers (GG, Arg/Arg) compared to C-carriers (CG/CC)(p=0.01). G-carriers were also more likely to have poorer survival compared to patients with CC genotype (p=0.04).Our results suggest that the Codon 72 polymorphism was not associated with the EC in eastern Turkey. However, GGgenotype (Arg/Arg) may have a role in tumor development at the lower location of the esophagus. Additionally, G carriersmay exist the poorer survival compared to the non-G carriers (CC). Therefore, it is thought that individuals with CCgenotype (Pro/Pro) may have better survival.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, Z., KARAN, B. M., GORGİSEN, G., ALMALİ, N. (2021). Evaluation of TP53 codon 72 polymorphism in esophageal cancer susceptibility in Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 388–395. https://ajindex.com/articles/348289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Domper Arnal MJ, Ferrandez Arenas A, Lanas Arbeloa A. Esophageal cancer: risk factors, screening and endoscopic treatment in Western and Eastern countries. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 7933-7943
  2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: 359-386
  3. Antonsson A, Nancarrow DJ, Brown IS, et al. High-risk human papilloma virüs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 2080-2087
  4. Aysen TS. Epidemiology of esophagus cancer. J Exp Clin.Med 2012; 29: 203-208
  5. Siewert JR, Ott K. Are squamous and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus the same disease? Semin Radiat.Oncol 2007; 17: 38-44
  6. Odze RD, Goldblum JR. Surgical pathology of the GI tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas J.N. Glickman, R.D. Odze (Eds.), Epithelial Neoplasm of the Esophagus (second ed.), Saunders, Philadephia, PA 2009; 535-563
  7. Abnett CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 360-373
  8. Tang WR, Chen ZJ, Lin K, et al. Development of esophageal cancer in Chaoshan region, China: Association with environmental, genetic and cultural factors. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2015; 218: 12-18
  9. Umar M, Upadhyay R, Kumar S, et al. Role of novel and GWAS originated PLCE1 genetic variants in susceptibility and prognosis of esophageal cancer patients in northern Indian population. Tumour Biol 2014; 35: 11667-11676
  10. Chang J, Wei L, Miao X, et al. Two novel variants on 13q22.1 are associated with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 24: 1774-1780
  11. Levine DM, Ek WE, Zhang R, et al. A genomewide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett‘s esophagus. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1487-1493
  12. Dumont P, Leu JI, Della Pietra AC 3rd, et al. The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential. Nat Genet 2003; 33: 357-365
  13. Das M, Sharma SK, Sekhon GS, et al. p16 gene silencing along with p53 singlenucleotide polymorphism and risk of esophageal cancer in Northeast India. Tumor Biol 2017; 39: 1010428317698384
  14. Peng JZ, Xue L, Liu DG, et al. Association of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism with esophageal cancer in Chinese populations: a meta-analysis. Genet Mol Res 2015; 14: 9024-9033
  15. Eltahir HA, Adam AA, Yahia ZA, et al. p53 Codon 72 arginine/ p