SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Archivum Anatolicum-Anadolu Arşivleri / 2017 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

A Contribution to Localization of Azzi-Hayaša Mentioned in Hittite Cuneiform Texts

Hititçe Çivi Yazılı Metinlerde Geçen Azzi-Hayaša’nın Lokalizasyonuna Katkı

Serkan DEMİREL
Pages
97–110
Publication Date
2017-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It will also be pointed out that, in terms of contributing to the subject, the archaeological evidences related cultural and political conditions of the region and dated in the Late Bronze Age, are similar features with the Hittite cuneiform texts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Localization of Azzi-Hayaša Land mentioned in Hittite cuneiform texts dated 2nd millennium BC is not certain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This land equates generally some part of Eastern Black Sea region, but the determinations about this topic are mostly a statement of personal opinion, The purpose of this article is to examine Hittite cuneiform texts which provide information on the subject-matter and to strengthen the argument that Eastern Anatolia (region between Erzurum and Lake Van) may be more suitable for Azzi-Hayaša Land.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It will also be pointed out that, in terms of contributing to the subject, the archaeological evidences related cultural and political conditions of the region and dated in the Late Bronze Age, are similar features with the Hittite cuneiform texts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hitit · Çivi Yazılı Metinler · Azzi

Abstract

Localization of Azzi-Hayaša Land mentioned in Hittite cuneiform texts dated 2nd millennium BC is not certain. This land equates generally some part of Eastern Black Sea region, but the determinations about this topic are mostly a statement of personal opinion, The purpose of this article is to examine Hittite cuneiform texts which provide information on the subject-matter and to strengthen the argument that Eastern Anatolia (region between Erzurum and Lake Van) may be more suitable for Azzi-Hayaša Land. It will also be pointed out that, in terms of contributing to the subject, the archaeological evidences related cultural and political conditions of the region and dated in the Late Bronze Age, are similar features with the Hittite cuneiform texts.

Özet

MÖ. II. binyıla tarihlenen Hititçe çivi yazılı metinlerde ismi geçen Azzi-Hayaša Ülkesinin lokalizasyonuna dair bir belirsizlik vardır. Bu ülke genellikle Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi ile eşitlenmek istenmektedir, ancak bu tespit büyük ölçüde kişisel düşüncelerden ibarettir. Bu makalenin amacı konu hakkında bilgi veren Hititçe çivi yazılı metinlerin tetkik edilmesi ve bu doğrultuda Azzi-Hayaša Ülkesi için Doğu Anadolu’nun (Erzurum ve Van Gölü arasındaki bölge) daha uygun olabileceği görüşüne destek vermektir. Ayrıca, bölgenin kültürel ve siyasi şartları hakkında bilgi veren ve MÖ ikinci bin yıla tarihlenen arkeolojik verilerin Hititçe çivi yazılı metinler ile paralellik gösteriyor olmasına da dikkat çekilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİREL, S. (2017). A Contribution to Localization of Azzi-Hayaša Mentioned in Hittite Cuneiform Texts. Archivum Anatolicum-Anadolu Arşivleri, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 97–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/34822

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alp 1956: S. Alp, "Die Lage von Šamuha," Anatolia, 1, 1956: 77-80. Alp 1991:
  2. S. Alp, Hethitische Brief aus Maşat Höyük, TTKY, Ankara, 1991. Barjamovic 2011:
  3. G. Barjamovic, A Historical Geography of Anatolia in the Old Assyrian Colony Period, Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen, 2011. Bauer-Manndorf 1981:
  4. E. Bauer-Manndorf, Armenia, Past and Present, Reich Verlag, Lucerne, 1981. Beckman 1999:
  5. G. Beckman, Hittite Diplomatic Texts, Scholar Press, Atlanta, 1999. Bryce 2009:
  6. T. Bryce, The Routledge Handbook of the Peoples and Places of Ancient Western Asia: The Near East from the Early Bronze Age to the fall of the Persian Empire, Routlage, London and New York, 2009. Burney 1956: C. A. Burney, “Northern Anatolia Before Classical Times”, Anatolian Studies, 6, 1956: 179-203.
  7. Burney, Lang 1971:
  8. C. A. Burney, D. M. Lang, The peoples of the Hills: Ancient Ararat and Caucasus, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1971. London. Cornelius 1973:
  9. F. Cornelius, Geschichte der Hethiter. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der geographischen Verhaltnisse und der Rechtsgeschichte, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1973. Cornelius 1961: F. Cornelius, “Zur Geographie der Hethiter (Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise)”, Bibliotheca Orientalis, 18, 1961: 214-218. Cornelius 1958a: F. Cornelius, “Zur hethitischen Geographie: die Nachbarn des Hethiterreiches”, Revue hittite et asianique, 16, 1958a: 1-17. Cornelius 1958b: F. Cornelius, "Geographie des Hethiterreiches", Orientalia, 27, 1958b: 225-251. Çiğdem 2000: S. Çiğdem, “Başlangıçtan Eski Tunç Çağı’nın Sonu’na Kadar Erzurum ve Yöresi Geçim Kaynakları”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26, 2000: 197-210. Çilingiroğlu 1983: A. Çilingiroğlu, “Van Gölü Havzasında M. Ö. 2. Bin Kültürüne Ait Bazı Veriler”, I. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 1983: 25-29. Çilingiroğlu 1984: A. Çilingiroğlu, “The Second Millennium Painted Pottery Tradition of the Van Lake Basin”, Anatolian Studies, 34, 1984: 129 139. Çilingiroğlu 1987: A. Çilingiroğlu, “Van Gölü Havzasında Demir Çağların Başlangıcının Tarihi ", Anadolu Demir Çağları I, 1987: 108-115. del Monte 1992:
  10. G. F. del Monte, Die Orts- und Gewassernamen der hethitischen Texte, Wiesbaden Supplement, Répertoire Géographique des Textes Cunéiförmes, Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, Wiesbaden, VI/2, 1992. del Monte, Tischler 1978:
  11. G. F. del Monte, J. Tischler, Die Orts- und Gewassernamen der hethitischen Texte, Répertoire Géographique des Textes Cunéiförmes, VI, Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, Wiesbaden,