Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3

The role of complete blood count parameters in distinguishing complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis

Pages
181–185
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, we observe no significant differences in RDWand MPV levels in patients with complicated appendicitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Acute appendicitis is a prevalent disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thisstudy was conducted to search whether white blood cell (WBC) count, mean platelet volume(MPV), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)might be useful to distinguish complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated patients who underwentopen appendectomy between January 2013 and December 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, we observe no significant differences in RDWand MPV levels in patients with complicated appendicitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aims: Acute appendicitis is a prevalent disease. In recent years, conservative treatment of acuteuncomplicated appendicitis has been popular but complicated disease requires surgery. Thisstudy was conducted to search whether white blood cell (WBC) count, mean platelet volume(MPV), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)might be useful to distinguish complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated patients who underwentopen appendectomy between January 2013 and December 2015. Then, the subjects weredivided into two groups according to surgical exploration and pathological examination:complicated appendicitis and uncomplicated appendicitis. Complicated cases were classifiedinto 3 subgroups: 1) appendix perforation, 2) plastron appendicitis, and 3) necrosis of appendix.WBC, MPV, RDW, and NLR values were compared in all groups.Results: A total of 1,219 patients were analyzed. Complicated appendicitis was more common inmale patients (n=71, 9.6%). The median WBC (16.1x109/L) and NLR (7.9 n/μL) were significantlyhigher in complicated appendicitis compared to uncomplicated disease (p<0.001, for both).The cut-off value for WBC and NLR to distinguish a complicated disease was 14.6x109/L and 6.2n/μL, respectively. MPV and RDW were not useful.Conclusions: WBC and NLR may be helpful in distinguishing between complicated anduncomplicated appendiceal disease. However, we observe no significant differences in RDWand MPV levels in patients with complicated appendicitis.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIGÖZ, T., AYDEMİR, U. (2021). The role of complete blood count parameters in distinguishing complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3, 181–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/347977

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Boshnak N, Boshnaq M, Elgohary H. Evaluation of Platelet Indices and Red Cell Distribution Width as New Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis. J Invest Surg. 2018;31:121-129
  2. Zahorec R. Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts--rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2001;102:5-14
  3. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Hobbs N, Mansour M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts acute appendicitis and distinguishes between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2020;219:154-163
  4. Nishizaki Y, Daida H. Red blood cell distribution width for heart failure. Intern Med. 2013;52:417
  5. Thachil J. Platelets in Inflammatory Disorders: A Pathophysiological and Clinical Perspective. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015;41:572-581
  6. Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386:1278-1287
  7. Perez KS, Allen SR. Complicated appendicitis and considerations for interval appendectomy. JAAPA. 2018;31:35-41
  8. Eddama M, Fragkos KC, Renshaw S, et al. Logistic regression model to predict acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101:107-118
  9. Acharya A, Markar SR, Ni M, Hanna GB. Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost-benefit trade-off analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1022-1031
  10. Tind S, Lassen AT, Zimmerman-Nielsen E, Qvist N. C-reactive protein and white blood cell count do not improve clinical decision-making in acute appendicitis. Dan Med J. 2015;62:A5167
  11. Daldal E, Dagmura H. The Correlation between Complete Blood Count Parameters and Appendix Diameter for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8:39
  12. Bozkurt S, Köse A, Erdogan S, et al. MPV and other inflammatory markers in diagnosing acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65:637-641
  13. Dinc T, Senol K, Yildiz B, Kayilioglu I, Sozen I, Coskun F. Association between red cell distribution width and mean platelet volume with appendicitis: a myth or a fact? Bratisl Lek Listy. 2015;116:499-501
  14. Tanrikulu CS, Tanrikulu Y, Sabuncuoglu MZ, Karamercan MA, Akkapulu N, Coskun F. Mean platelet volume and red cell distribution width as a diagnostic marker in acute appendicitis. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16:e10211
  15. Hong N, Oh J, Kang SM, et al. Red blood cell distribution width predicts early mo